司法建議初探
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2019-05-11 03:48
【摘要】:司法建議制度是我國(guó)人民司法工作創(chuàng)制出的一項(xiàng)重要制度,在以往人民法院司法的長(zhǎng)期實(shí)踐中發(fā)揮過(guò)積極的作用。司法建議作為化解矛盾糾紛、提高社會(huì)管理水平的司法服務(wù)手段,是人民法院審判職能的延伸,對(duì)于促進(jìn)社會(huì)安定與和諧,增強(qiáng)全社會(huì)法律意識(shí),建設(shè)法治社會(huì),發(fā)揮了重要作用。隨著社會(huì)主義和諧社會(huì)的不斷進(jìn)步和經(jīng)濟(jì)的迅猛發(fā)展,司法建議制度對(duì)我們國(guó)家的意義越發(fā)顯的重要。特別是2008年下半年以來(lái),面對(duì)國(guó)際金融危機(jī)的沖擊,各級(jí)人民法院努力加強(qiáng)司法應(yīng)對(duì),積極的對(duì)相關(guān)社會(huì)主體發(fā)送合理化的司法建議,以能動(dòng)司法的生動(dòng)實(shí)踐,為保增長(zhǎng)、保民生、保穩(wěn)定作出了積極貢獻(xiàn)?梢赃@么說(shuō),司法建議工作,是這一時(shí)期我國(guó)人民法院工作最大的亮點(diǎn)。本文通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)如今司法建議制度存在的問(wèn)題,比如像:司法建議數(shù)量少、質(zhì)量不高,未形成完善的管理體制;司法建議回復(fù)率低,效果不突出;司法建議沒(méi)有強(qiáng)制性,缺乏監(jiān)督落實(shí)手段;建議對(duì)象不廣泛,涉及領(lǐng)域不平衡;建議方式相對(duì)單一等等現(xiàn)狀的分析。從理論到實(shí)際案例,簡(jiǎn)要的對(duì)司法建議制度進(jìn)行了一系列探析,對(duì)司法建議制度的發(fā)展方向,從觀念的培養(yǎng)、理論的建設(shè)、配套制度的銜接、司法建議質(zhì)量的提高、實(shí)施方法的科學(xué)性等方面提出了自己的一些見(jiàn)解。
[Abstract]:The judicial suggestion system is an important system created by the people's judicial work in our country, which has played an active role in the long-term practice of the people's court in the past. Judicial suggestion, as a judicial service means to resolve contradictions and disputes and improve the level of social management, is an extension of the trial function of the people's court, in order to promote social stability and harmony, enhance the legal consciousness of the whole society, and build a society ruled by law. Played an important role. With the continuous progress of socialist harmonious society and the rapid development of economy, the judicial suggestion system is more and more important to our country. In particular, since the second half of 2008, in the face of the impact of the international financial crisis, people's courts at all levels have made efforts to strengthen judicial responses and actively send rational judicial suggestions to relevant social subjects in order to ensure growth through the vivid practice of active justice. We have made positive contributions to ensuring people's livelihood and stability. It can be said that the judicial suggestion work is the biggest bright spot of the people's court work in our country during this period. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the current judicial suggestion system, such as: the quantity of judicial advice is small, the quality is not high, and a perfect management system has not been formed, the response rate of judicial suggestion is low, and the effect is not prominent. Judicial recommendations are not mandatory, lack of means of supervision and implementation; recommendations are not widely targeted, involving areas imbalance; suggestion methods are relatively single and so on. From theory to practical case, this paper briefly probes into the judicial suggestion system, and makes a series of analysis on the development direction of the judicial suggestion system, from the cultivation of the concept, the construction of the theory, the connection of the supporting system and the improvement of the quality of the judicial suggestion. Some opinions on the scientific implementation methods are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D926.2
本文編號(hào):2474224
[Abstract]:The judicial suggestion system is an important system created by the people's judicial work in our country, which has played an active role in the long-term practice of the people's court in the past. Judicial suggestion, as a judicial service means to resolve contradictions and disputes and improve the level of social management, is an extension of the trial function of the people's court, in order to promote social stability and harmony, enhance the legal consciousness of the whole society, and build a society ruled by law. Played an important role. With the continuous progress of socialist harmonious society and the rapid development of economy, the judicial suggestion system is more and more important to our country. In particular, since the second half of 2008, in the face of the impact of the international financial crisis, people's courts at all levels have made efforts to strengthen judicial responses and actively send rational judicial suggestions to relevant social subjects in order to ensure growth through the vivid practice of active justice. We have made positive contributions to ensuring people's livelihood and stability. It can be said that the judicial suggestion work is the biggest bright spot of the people's court work in our country during this period. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the current judicial suggestion system, such as: the quantity of judicial advice is small, the quality is not high, and a perfect management system has not been formed, the response rate of judicial suggestion is low, and the effect is not prominent. Judicial recommendations are not mandatory, lack of means of supervision and implementation; recommendations are not widely targeted, involving areas imbalance; suggestion methods are relatively single and so on. From theory to practical case, this paper briefly probes into the judicial suggestion system, and makes a series of analysis on the development direction of the judicial suggestion system, from the cultivation of the concept, the construction of the theory, the connection of the supporting system and the improvement of the quality of the judicial suggestion. Some opinions on the scientific implementation methods are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2011
【分類號(hào)】:D926.2
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 吳歡;;行政訴訟司法建議制度研究述評(píng)[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年01期
2 李艷;;司法能動(dòng)主義視野下的我國(guó)司法建議研究[J];商;2013年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條
1 陳輝;行政訴訟司法建議探析[D];安徽大學(xué);2012年
2 張念強(qiáng);行政訴訟司法建議的價(jià)值及其重構(gòu)[D];華東政法大學(xué);2012年
,本文編號(hào):2474224
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/2474224.html
最近更新
教材專著