發(fā)布時間：2018-10-24 19:14

【摘要】：十八屆四中全會明確提出“完善和發(fā)展中國特色社會主義制度,推進治理體系和治理能力現(xiàn)代化”的目標,它標志著治理理念在政府執(zhí)政方針中的正式引入。社會治理不同于傳統(tǒng)行政管理,是我國執(zhí)政理念的重大創(chuàng)新。社會治理來源于社會自治權,強調(diào)主體間的協(xié)作與自治。而所謂基層人民調(diào)解的社會治理功能,就是由政府主導,依靠民間組織、社會組織等其它第三方部門的協(xié)調(diào)與參與,通過人民調(diào)解化解社會糾紛,維護社會和諧,從而對社會秩序進行有效治理。在我國基層管理實務中,人民調(diào)解組織除了承擔基層糾紛化解功能之外,還承擔著普法宣傳、人際關系融合的文化整合功能以及秩序維護和風險控制的政治控制功能。其中,基層人民調(diào)解的糾紛解決功能,是其發(fā)揮政治控制與文化整合功能的基礎;而其政治、文化功能的發(fā)揮,則建立在其解紛功能的基礎之上。當然,我國基層人民調(diào)解的制度功能要實現(xiàn)從傳統(tǒng)的行政管理向現(xiàn)代社會治理功能的轉(zhuǎn)變,仍然面臨著一系列的困境,具體表現(xiàn)為人民調(diào)解糾紛解決功能的弱化、社會控制功能過于強化,以及文化功能部分失效等。這些阻礙因素不僅包含人民調(diào)解制度本身的缺陷,還與社會轉(zhuǎn)型帶來社會經(jīng)濟結構和人們生活方式的轉(zhuǎn)變、社會理念的改變有關。此外“行政化”與“自治化”的矛盾也是是影響其治理功能發(fā)揮的一個重要阻礙因素。為了充分發(fā)揮基層人民調(diào)解制度的社會治理功能,需要轉(zhuǎn)變政府理念,實現(xiàn)由“全能政府”轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)椤坝邢拚钡倪^渡;需要振興基層調(diào)解組織,增強社會自治力量;需要平衡調(diào)解與審判的關系,將人民調(diào)解制度納入法治軌道。
[Abstract]:The fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee clearly put forward the goal of "perfecting and developing the socialist system with Chinese characteristics, promoting the modernization of the governance system and governing ability", which marks the formal introduction of the concept of governance in the government's governing policy. Social governance is different from traditional administration, and it is an important innovation of our ruling concept. Social governance originates from social autonomy and emphasizes the cooperation and autonomy between subjects. The social governance function of the so-called grass-roots people's mediation is that it is led by the government, relying on the coordination and participation of non-governmental organizations, social organizations, and other third-party departments to resolve social disputes and maintain social harmony through people's mediation. So that the social order for effective governance. In the practice of grass-roots management in our country, the people's mediation organization undertakes not only the functions of resolving disputes at the grass-roots level, but also the functions of cultural integration of popularizing the law, the integration of interpersonal relations and the political control of order maintenance and risk control. Among them, the dispute resolution function of grass-roots people's mediation is the basis of its function of political control and cultural integration, while its political and cultural function is based on its function of resolving disputes. Of course, in order to realize the transformation from traditional administration to modern social governance, the system function of people's mediation at the grass-roots level still faces a series of dilemmas, which is manifested in the weakening of the function of people's mediation and dispute resolution. The function of social control is too strong, and the function of culture is partly invalid. These factors not only contain the defects of the people's mediation system, but also have something to do with the transformation of the social economic structure and people's way of life and the change of the social concept. In addition, the contradiction between "administration" and "autonomy" is an important hindrance to its governance function. In order to give full play to the social governance function of the people's mediation system at the grass-roots level, it is necessary to change the concept of government, realize the transition from "all-powerful government" to "limited government", revitalize the grass-roots mediation organizations and strengthen the social autonomy. It is necessary to balance the relationship between mediation and trial and bring the people's mediation system into the track of ruling by law.
【學位授予單位】：湘潭大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前10條

1 劉正強;;“無知之幕”的中國情境與糾紛治理的司法困境[J];甘肅理論學刊;2014年03期

2 任映紅;車文君;;鄉(xiāng)村治理中的文化運行邏輯[J];理論探討;2014年01期

3 李泉;;治理理論的譜系與轉(zhuǎn)型中國[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2012年06期

4 朱新林;;人民調(diào)解:衰落與復興——基于1986—2009年人民調(diào)解解紛數(shù)量的分析[J];河南財經(jīng)政法大學學報;2012年04期

5 孫柏瑛;;基層政府社會管理中的適應性變革[J];中國行政管理;2012年05期

6 楊國良;;地方治理視域下的農(nóng)村人民調(diào)解——基于對湖北省某鎮(zhèn)的實證調(diào)查[J];地方財政研究;2010年02期

7 李水金;王瓊;;公共事業(yè)管理的概念內(nèi)涵及其與行政管理、公共管理的關系辨析[J];湖北師范學院學報(哲學社會科學版);2009年06期

8 周光輝;;從管制轉(zhuǎn)向服務:中國政府的管理革命——中國行政管理改革30年[J];吉林大學社會科學學報;2008年03期

9 周永坤;;論強制性調(diào)解對法治和公平的沖擊[J];法律科學(西北政法學院學報);2007年03期

10 陳慧;;當前民事訴訟中的惡意調(diào)解現(xiàn)象及防范研究 兼談我國惡意訴訟侵權責任制度的建立[J];法律適用;2007年05期

中國博士學位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前3條

1 謝新松;文化的社會治理功能研究[D];云南大學;2013年

2 李婷婷;社會治理視域下的人民調(diào)解—功能與再定位[D];南開大學;2013年

3 張愛球;論現(xiàn)代社會中的訴訟功能[D];南京師范大學;2004年

中國碩士學位論文全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前3條

1 賀小蘋;社會治理創(chuàng)新視野中的人民調(diào)解體系研究[D];福建師范大學;2014年

2 丁樂利;對完善我國人民調(diào)解制度的法律思考[D];中國政法大學;2011年

3 劉行玉;轉(zhuǎn)型期農(nóng)村人民調(diào)解的法社會學研究[D];山東大學;2008年

，

本文編號：2292300