【摘要】：本文圍繞律師的有效代理這一主線,主要從五個部分展開論述。文章的第一部分為律師有效代理的理論綜述。作者從有效代理在法律條文中的體現(xiàn)、概念解讀、認定標準以及有效代理在多維度的意義層面進行分析,并創(chuàng)新性地將律師的有效代理概念解讀為以下四個層面,即“一個中心,兩方主體,三維要求,四重效果”。律師有效代理的認定標準則主要從職業(yè)操守和法律技能兩方面進行界定。職業(yè)操守層面涉及勤勉盡責、誠信、保守秘密、忠誠義務(wù)、同理心等方面;法律技能層面涉及扎實的法律知識功底,審慎的判斷力,縝密的表達能力等方面。在該部分中作者將律師提供有效的法律代理服務(wù)視為律師職業(yè)屬性和以委托人利益為中心執(zhí)業(yè)理念的應(yīng)有之義。 第二部分從現(xiàn)實發(fā)生的案例著手,將律師有效代理的缺失歸納為六個方面。繼而,在部分中作者分析了有效代理缺失在現(xiàn)實中的多方影響。律師有效代理的缺失不僅直接影響到委托人的利益,而且貶損律師自身的形象,更有甚者,會加劇公眾對包含律師服務(wù)、法院審判等在內(nèi)的司法環(huán)境的不信任。 文章的第三部分主要從四個方面分析了律師有效代理缺失的原因。首先,律師這一法律服務(wù)供體既有著法律人的特質(zhì),又有著經(jīng)濟人的特質(zhì)。游走在職業(yè)使命和商業(yè)主義之間的律師群體,不可避免地面臨經(jīng)濟上的巨大誘惑而出現(xiàn)偏離職責和擔當?shù)目赡苄?其次,律師代理案件,理所當然地會跟法官打交道。法官與律師在庭上的不良對抗以及在庭外的不當交往,無形之中使得律師的有效代理大打折扣;再次,在公訴案件中,檢察機關(guān)與律師分庭抗禮,倘若檢察官恃權(quán)自大,也會直接弱化律師有效代理的實現(xiàn);最后,當下法務(wù)市場主體良莠不齊,公眾認識的局限性亦會導(dǎo)致律師有效代理的“被缺失”。 在第四部分中,作者根據(jù)在第三部分提及的原因,有針對性地列出對策,對癥下藥。第一,律師隊伍必須獨善其身,在職業(yè)操守和法律職業(yè)技能兩方面努力提升自身素質(zhì);第二,規(guī)范法官與律師之間的關(guān)系,提高律師的地位;第三,規(guī)范檢察官與律師之間的關(guān)系,增強律師的聲音;第四,整頓法律服務(wù)市場,提高公眾認識,優(yōu)化律師的執(zhí)業(yè)環(huán)境。第五,構(gòu)建律師誠信評價系統(tǒng),使得律師對于委案不敢懈怠、不能懈怠、不愿懈怠。構(gòu)建具有“嚇阻效應(yīng)”的律師誠信評價系統(tǒng)的設(shè)想,是本文的創(chuàng)新之處。該評價系統(tǒng)涉及五方主體——創(chuàng)建主體、維護主體、監(jiān)督主體、評價主體和受益主體。該誠信評價系統(tǒng)之所以具有“嚇阻效應(yīng)”,一方面,它具有預(yù)防之功效,另一方面,它也有委托人投訴制度之懲戒功用。 第五部分是本文的結(jié)語部分,在此部分中,作者表達了對未來律師提供熱忱盡職法律服務(wù)的大環(huán)境到來的殷殷期許
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on the main line of effective representation of lawyers, mainly from five parts. The first part of the article summarizes the theory of effective representation of lawyers. The author analyzes the embodiment of effective agency in legal articles, the interpretation of concept, the standard of cognizance and the meaning of effective agency in many dimensions, and interprets the concept of effective agency of lawyer into the following four levels. That is, "one center, two main bodies, three-dimensional requirements, four-fold effects." The standard of effective representation of lawyers is mainly defined from two aspects: professional conduct and legal skills. Professional integrity involves diligence, integrity, secrecy, loyalty, empathy, and so on; legal skills involve solid legal knowledge, prudent judgment, careful expression, and so on. In this part, the author regards providing effective legal representation service as the proper meaning of lawyer's professional attribute and client's interests as the center of practice. The second part starts with the actual cases and concludes the lack of effective representation into six aspects. Then, the author analyzes the effect of the absence of effective agent in reality. The lack of effective representation of lawyers not only directly affects the interests of clients, but also detracts the image of lawyers themselves. What is more, the lack of effective representation of lawyers will aggravate the public's distrust of the judicial environment, including the services of lawyers, court trials, and so on. The third part of the article analyzes the reasons for the lack of effective representation from four aspects. First of all, lawyer as a legal service donor has the characteristics of legal person as well as economic man. The group of lawyers who wander between professional mission and commercialism inevitably face the great economic temptation to deviate from their duties and take on the possibility; secondly, lawyers' representation cases naturally deal with judges. The bad confrontation between the judge and the lawyer in court and the improper communication out of court have made the effective representation of the lawyer greatly reduced. Thirdly, in the case of public prosecution, the procuratorial organ and the lawyer are competing against each other, if the prosecutor relies on his right to be arrogant, It also directly weakens the realization of effective representation of lawyers; finally, the main body of the current legal affairs market is intermingled, and the limitations of public understanding will lead to the lack of effective representation of lawyers. In the fourth part, according to the reasons mentioned in the third part, the author lists the countermeasures. First, the team of lawyers must strive to improve their quality in terms of professional conduct and legal professional skills; second, to regulate the relationship between judges and lawyers, and to improve the status of lawyers; third, The fourth is to rectify the legal service market, improve the public understanding and optimize the lawyer's practice environment. Fifthly, to construct the system of lawyers' integrity evaluation, which makes lawyers not lazy, unable to slacken, unwilling to slacken. It is the innovation of this paper to construct an evaluation system of lawyer's honesty and credit with "deterrent effect". The evaluation system involves five main bodies: creating, maintaining, supervising, evaluating and benefiting. On the one hand, it has preventive effect, on the other hand, it also has the disciplinary function of client complaint system. The fifth part is the conclusion of this paper, in which the author expresses his earnest expectations for the coming environment of dedicated legal service for future lawyers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.5

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李軍偉;論律師執(zhí)業(yè)中的利益沖突[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號：2270704