發(fā)布時間：2018-09-19 19:25

【摘要】："宜黃事件"是一起因傳媒監(jiān)督而具有法律意義的典型事件。對該起事件的調(diào)研及對相關(guān)新聞內(nèi)容的梳理表明,其傳媒監(jiān)督權(quán)行使的信息基礎(chǔ)存在瑕疵,有違新聞報道的基本要求;相關(guān)傳媒也未能堅(jiān)持中立的立場,報導(dǎo)中未能做到盡可能的客觀公正,未能兼顧沖突雙方的話語權(quán)。因此,該案傳媒監(jiān)督權(quán)的行使出現(xiàn)了法治偏差。這與傳媒介入的特性有關(guān),更與傳媒追求商業(yè)利益的傾向有關(guān)。社會和公共領(lǐng)域中的政治力量,也可能影響傳媒監(jiān)督權(quán)的立場。承擔(dān)公共表達(dá)職能的傳媒,是現(xiàn)代法治國家共同價值的維系紐帶之一,因此需要平衡商業(yè)利益和政治力量的制約,塑造傳媒監(jiān)督的健康立場。這可以通過職業(yè)倫理約束和法律規(guī)范的共同作用來實(shí)現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Yihuang incident is a typical event with legal significance because of media supervision. The investigation of the incident and the combing of the relevant news contents show that the information basis for the exercise of the right of media supervision is flawed, which is contrary to the basic requirements of news reporting, and the relevant media have also failed to adhere to a neutral position. The report failed to be as objective and impartial as possible and failed to balance the rights of both sides of the conflict. Therefore, the exercise of the right of supervision of the media in this case appeared a deviation of the rule of law. This is related to the nature of media intervention and the tendency of the media to pursue commercial interests. Political forces in the social and public spheres may also influence the position of media supervision. The mass media, which assume the public expression function, is one of the bonds of the common value of the modern country ruled by law. Therefore, it is necessary to balance the restriction of commercial interests and political forces, and to shape the healthy stand of media supervision. This can be achieved through the combination of professional ethical constraints and legal norms.
【作者單位】： 中南財經(jīng)政法大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：教育部人文社科項(xiàng)目“農(nóng)地制度變遷的法律效果和社會效果研究”(項(xiàng)目編號:09YJCZH119)的階段性成果
【分類號】：G206;D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 王啟梁;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)時代的民意與法律應(yīng)有之品性——從“躲貓貓”事件切入[J];法商研究;2009年04期

2 陳柏峰;;法治熱點(diǎn)案件討論中的傳媒角色——以“藥家鑫案”為例[J];法商研究;2011年04期

3 崔曉林;;“燃燒”的宜黃——“9·10”拆遷自焚事件調(diào)查[J];中國經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2010年39期

4 顧培東;論對司法的傳媒監(jiān)督[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年06期

5 賀衛(wèi)方;傳媒與司法三題[J];法學(xué)研究;1998年06期

6 蕭武;;理解拆遷[J];綠葉;2011年01期

7 劉燕;;案件事實(shí)的人物建構(gòu)——崔英杰案敘事分析[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2009年02期

8 栗崢;;傳媒與司法的偏差——以2009十大影響性訴訟案例為例[J];政法論壇;2010年05期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 龔曉s，

本文編號：2251093