【摘要】：隨著社會主體關(guān)系、社會利益和沖突的多元化發(fā)展，，醫(yī)學(xué)科學(xué)的不斷進(jìn)步，我國迫切需要對現(xiàn)行的醫(yī)療糾紛處理機(jī)制進(jìn)行相應(yīng)的改革、完善。而ADR(AlternativeDispute Resolution)——訴訟外糾紛解決機(jī)制所具有的專業(yè)、快捷、簡便及保密性強(qiáng)等優(yōu)勢特性，在糾紛解決方面逐漸嶄露頭角，逐漸成為許多國家和地區(qū)解決民事糾紛的重要方式。根據(jù)我國的具體國情和實(shí)際狀況，在醫(yī)療糾紛領(lǐng)域引入ADR是幫助醫(yī)療糾紛解決更加有效、快速地進(jìn)行。但是，引入并建立我國醫(yī)療糾紛ADR解決機(jī)制必須符合我國國情和醫(yī)療糾紛的特殊成因和性質(zhì)。 本文通過文獻(xiàn)回顧的方法取得最新研究數(shù)據(jù)和有關(guān)法律法規(guī)，并在通過理論分析，尋找醫(yī)療糾紛ADR解決機(jī)制不足之處，并提出改進(jìn)建議。全文約2萬字，除引言和結(jié)語，正文共有五個部分。主要內(nèi)容如下： 第一部分探討醫(yī)療糾紛的概念并分析形成的原因，目的在于明確我國醫(yī)療糾紛的實(shí)質(zhì)及其特殊性質(zhì)，便于針對性的構(gòu)建、完善非訟解決機(jī)制。第二部分通過分析司法訴訟、醫(yī)患雙方自行協(xié)商、行政機(jī)關(guān)調(diào)節(jié)等我國現(xiàn)有的三種醫(yī)療糾紛解決方式現(xiàn)狀，檢討現(xiàn)行解糾模式存有的缺漏；第三部分通過分析ADR的特質(zhì)和優(yōu)勢，結(jié)合醫(yī)療糾紛的特點(diǎn)和沖突根源，分析在解決醫(yī)療糾紛方面適用ADR的意義所在；第四部分是通過分析我國現(xiàn)有醫(yī)療訴訟ADR解決機(jī)制的模式，發(fā)現(xiàn)存在的問題，并獲取外國醫(yī)療糾紛ADR解決模式進(jìn)行對符合我國國情和實(shí)際的解決機(jī)制的借鑒和啟示；第五方面是對于如何進(jìn)一步完善醫(yī)療糾紛ADR解決機(jī)制的建議，其中提出三點(diǎn)意見：第一，是要堅(jiān)定第三方調(diào)解機(jī)構(gòu)客觀中立立場；第二，是要加強(qiáng)第三方調(diào)解機(jī)構(gòu)專業(yè)人才保有和培育；第三，是建立醫(yī)療糾紛ADR解決機(jī)制完善的配套連接系統(tǒng)。
[Abstract]:With the pluralistic development of social interests and conflicts, and the continuous progress of medical science, China urgently needs to reform and perfect the current medical dispute handling mechanism. ADR (AlternativeDispute Resolution)-the dispute settlement mechanism outside litigation has the advantages of professionalism, convenience, confidentiality and so on. It has gradually emerged in dispute resolution and become an important way to solve civil disputes in many countries and regions. According to our country's specific national conditions and actual conditions, the introduction of ADR in the field of medical disputes is to help resolve medical disputes more effectively and quickly. However, the introduction and establishment of medical dispute ADR resolution mechanism must conform to the national conditions of our country and the special cause and nature of medical dispute. This paper obtains the latest research data and relevant laws and regulations through the method of literature review, and through theoretical analysis, finds out the deficiency of ADR resolution mechanism of medical disputes, and puts forward some suggestions for improvement. The full text is about 20, 000 words, except the introduction and the conclusion, the text has five parts. The main contents are as follows: the first part discusses the concept of medical disputes and analyzes the reasons for their formation, the purpose of which is to clarify the essence and special properties of medical disputes in China, to facilitate the construction of targeted, and to improve the non-litigation resolution mechanism. The second part reviews the defects in the current mode of resolving medical disputes by analyzing the current situation of three kinds of medical dispute resolution methods, such as judicial litigation, consultation between doctors and patients, adjustment of administrative organs, etc. In the third part, the characteristics and advantages of ADR are analyzed. Combined with the characteristics of medical disputes and the root causes of conflicts, the significance of applying ADR in resolving medical disputes is analyzed. The fourth part is to find the existing problems by analyzing the mode of ADR solution mechanism of medical litigation in our country. And to obtain the foreign medical dispute ADR solution model for China's national conditions and the actual solution mechanism for reference and inspiration; the fifth aspect is how to further improve the medical dispute ADR resolution mechanism, which puts forward three suggestions: first, It is necessary to strengthen the objective neutral position of the third-party mediation organization; second, to strengthen the third party mediation organization professional talent retention and cultivation; third, to establish a complete ADR medical dispute resolution mechanism of the supporting connection system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高尚;羅瀟;孫建;;人民調(diào)解介入醫(yī)療糾紛處理的背景、現(xiàn)狀與發(fā)展[J];中國司法;2012年05期

2 杜宏偉,王國華,張建東;規(guī)范醫(yī)療責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)化解醫(yī)療風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];口岸衛(wèi)生控制;2005年02期

3 ;人民調(diào)解 破解醫(yī)患糾紛的新途徑——寧波市醫(yī)療糾紛人民調(diào)解委員會工作紀(jì)實(shí)[J];寧波通訊;2008年09期

4 李卓凝;張轉(zhuǎn)利;;醫(yī)法結(jié)合是醫(yī)療糾紛鑒定的必然趨勢[J];中國司法鑒定;2009年06期

5 曾彩瓊;李正新;;醫(yī)療糾紛上升原因探析[J];西部醫(yī)學(xué);2006年02期

6 楊帆;劉茜;楊天潼;鄭娜;杜飛;李姍姍;劉良;;日本的醫(yī)療責(zé)任保險(xiǎn)制度及對我國的啟示[J];醫(yī)學(xué)與社會;2008年10期

7 陳翰丹;;論醫(yī)療糾紛人民調(diào)解機(jī)制的完善[J];醫(yī)學(xué)與哲學(xué)(人文社會醫(yī)學(xué)版);2011年07期

8 鄭淵,雷曉坤;日本的醫(yī)療糾紛處理與防范機(jī)制及其對我國的啟示[J];中國醫(yī)院管理;2004年12期

9 張萌;吳雪松;;醫(yī)療事故鑒定的證據(jù)作用[J];中國醫(yī)院管理;2006年10期

10 曹杰;方鵬騫;高昭f;劉敬;高明;;醫(yī)療糾紛的非訴訟處理機(jī)制(ADR)適用優(yōu)勢研究[J];中國醫(yī)院管理;2009年12期

本文編號：2243075