【摘要】：調(diào)解是中國傳統(tǒng)社會定紛止?fàn)幍闹匾绞�。法院主持下的調(diào)解作為我國調(diào)解制度的重要組成部分,是法院對民事案件行使審判權(quán)和當(dāng)事人對自己的民事訴訟權(quán)利和民事權(quán)利行使處分權(quán)的結(jié)合,在解決當(dāng)事人糾紛方面發(fā)揮了積極的作用,也對中國法治發(fā)展進(jìn)程作出了獨(dú)特的貢獻(xiàn)。當(dāng)前,隨著改革開放的進(jìn)一步深入,我國社會形態(tài)呈現(xiàn)多樣化,社會矛盾呈現(xiàn)多樣性、復(fù)雜性和多發(fā)性,民事、經(jīng)濟(jì)等糾紛案件逐年上升,法院維護(hù)社會穩(wěn)定的任務(wù)日益繁重,法院主持下的調(diào)解工作面臨新問題新挑戰(zhàn)。在比較研究的基礎(chǔ)上,重新審視和解讀法院主持下的各種調(diào)解機(jī)制對理解我國倡導(dǎo)的“大調(diào)解”理念、推動司法改革進(jìn)程、加快國家法治建設(shè)具有積極的意義。 本文試從司法運(yùn)行現(xiàn)狀入手,明確法院主持下的各種調(diào)解機(jī)制的立法框架、種類、特征及成因;分析法院主持下的各種調(diào)解機(jī)制之間的共同點(diǎn)和差異點(diǎn),闡明相互間的銜接與協(xié)同;分析我國當(dāng)前國情下法院主持下的各種調(diào)解機(jī)制存在必要性和一定程度上的合理性;分析比較國內(nèi)外相關(guān)制度,以比較法的視野研究我國法院主持下的各種調(diào)解機(jī)制;最后提出一些完善法院主持下的各種調(diào)解機(jī)制的思路和設(shè)想,通過樹立正確的調(diào)解理念、明確定位法院主持下的調(diào)解機(jī)制和創(chuàng)新法院主持下的調(diào)解藝術(shù),以期盡快完善與推進(jìn)法院主持下的各種調(diào)解機(jī)制,以適應(yīng)多層次的司法需求、多元化的程序設(shè)計和多種類的審判運(yùn)作。
[Abstract]:Mediation is an important way to settle disputes in traditional Chinese society. Mediation under the auspices of the court, as an important part of the mediation system in our country, is the combination of the exercise of judicial power in civil cases by the court and the right of the parties to exercise their own civil litigation rights and the right to dispose of civil rights. It has played an active role in resolving disputes between parties and has made a unique contribution to the development of China's rule of law. At present, with the further deepening of reform and opening up, the social forms of our country present diversification, social contradictions present diversity, complexity and multiple, civil, economic and other disputes cases rise year by year, the task of the courts to maintain social stability is increasingly heavy. Mediation under the auspices of the Court faces new problems and challenges. On the basis of comparative study, it is of positive significance to re-examine and interpret various mediation mechanisms under the auspices of the Court to understand the concept of "Great Mediation" advocated by our country, to promote the process of judicial reform and to speed up the construction of the country's rule of law. Starting with the current situation of judicial operation, this paper clarifies the legislative framework, types, characteristics and causes of various mediation mechanisms under the auspices of the court, and analyzes the common points and differences between the various mediation mechanisms under the auspices of the court. To clarify the cohesion and synergy between each other; to analyze the necessity and rationality of various mediation mechanisms under the auspices of the court under the current situation of our country; to analyze and compare the relevant systems at home and abroad, From the perspective of comparative law, this paper studies various mediation mechanisms under the auspices of Chinese courts, and finally puts forward some ideas and ideas for perfecting the mediation mechanisms under the auspices of the courts, and sets up a correct mediation concept. Clearly positioning the mediation mechanism under the auspices of the court and innovating the mediation art under the auspices of the court, in order to improve and promote the mediation mechanism under the auspices of the court as soon as possible, in order to meet the multi-level judicial needs, Diversified programming and a variety of trial operations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 章武生,張大海;論德國的起訴前強(qiáng)制調(diào)解制度[J];法商研究;2004年06期

2 李浩;;委托調(diào)解若干問題研究——對四個基層人民法院委托調(diào)解的初步考察[J];法商研究;2008年01期

3 郭玉軍;孫敏潔;;美國訴訟和解與中國法院調(diào)解之比較研究[J];法學(xué)評論;2006年02期

4 譚祖飛;王英;;論人民調(diào)解制度[J];求實(shí);2010年12期

5 范愉;調(diào)解的重構(gòu)(上)——以法院調(diào)解的改革為重點(diǎn)[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2004年02期

6 范愉;調(diào)解的重構(gòu)(下)——以法院調(diào)解的改革為重點(diǎn)[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2004年03期

7 劉敏;論現(xiàn)代法院調(diào)解制度[J];社會科學(xué)研究;2001年05期

8 徐黎明;;論行政機(jī)關(guān)處理民事糾紛在多元糾紛解決機(jī)制中的地位[J];西安文理學(xué)院學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期

9 吳軍;;完善人民調(diào)解制度與構(gòu)建和諧社會[J];中共珠海市委黨校珠海市行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2006年01期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 本報記者　 張國香 李文廣;[N];人民法院報;2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 周晉;論我國行政復(fù)議適用調(diào)解的可行性[D];湘潭大學(xué);2006年

2 曹勝;論我國民事訴訟調(diào)解制度的完善[D];對外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年

3 劉剛;從司法ADR視角論我國法院調(diào)解制度的重構(gòu)[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

4 顧華;論我國法院調(diào)解制度的完善[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

5 趙欣;我國法院調(diào)解制度的反思和完善[D];山東大學(xué);2008年

6 張昌善;和諧視野下我國民事訴訟調(diào)解制度之重塑[D];廈門大學(xué);2008年

7 鐘莉;中美調(diào)解制度比較研究[D];外交學(xué)院;2009年

8 李俊良;論新聞糾紛調(diào)解機(jī)制的建構(gòu)[D];南昌大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：2206971