【摘要】：裁判文書作為一項(xiàng)具有國(guó)家強(qiáng)制力的法律文書,由法院依據(jù)查明的案件事實(shí)并適用相關(guān)法律所做出,是整個(gè)審判過(guò)程中的關(guān)鍵環(huán)節(jié),也是整個(gè)審判過(guò)程的集中體現(xiàn),因此它的重要性不言而喻、舉足輕重。裁判文書是審判過(guò)程和審判結(jié)果的客觀呈現(xiàn),是實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正的載體。長(zhǎng)久以來(lái),裁判文書公開(kāi)的程度和范圍在很大程度上影響著審判公開(kāi)的實(shí)現(xiàn)程度,而審判公開(kāi)作為憲法中明確規(guī)定的一項(xiàng)原則,是我們必須堅(jiān)持并認(rèn)真貫徹落實(shí)的。由此看來(lái),裁判文書公開(kāi)也是我國(guó)憲法對(duì)司法提出的要求。不僅如此,裁判文書公開(kāi)有利于保障社會(huì)公眾對(duì)司法的知情權(quán),同時(shí)也能對(duì)司法活動(dòng)的公正性進(jìn)行監(jiān)督,有利于促進(jìn)司法公正和社會(huì)公正的實(shí)現(xiàn)。在技術(shù)日新月異的今天,互聯(lián)網(wǎng)為裁判文書公開(kāi)提供了新的路徑和突破口,是裁判文書公開(kāi)的一場(chǎng)新的革命。在傳播和媒介方式革新的大背景下,裁判文書通過(guò)互聯(lián)網(wǎng)進(jìn)行公開(kāi)不可避免地成為了裁判文書向社會(huì)進(jìn)行公開(kāi)和發(fā)布的主流趨勢(shì)。長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),為了使裁判文書公開(kāi)工作進(jìn)一步在全國(guó)范圍內(nèi)普遍開(kāi)展,最高人民法院在最近幾年的時(shí)間里已經(jīng)連續(xù)頒布多項(xiàng)有關(guān)裁判文書公開(kāi)方面的規(guī)范性文件,包括《關(guān)于加強(qiáng)人民法院審判公開(kāi)工作的若干意見(jiàn)》、《關(guān)于司法公開(kāi)的六項(xiàng)規(guī)定》和《關(guān)于人民法院在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)公布裁判文書的若干規(guī)定》等文件,但隨著社會(huì)的發(fā)展,在具體的實(shí)施過(guò)程中,裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)仍然存在許多盲區(qū)和空白點(diǎn),例如,如何解決司法實(shí)踐中裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)在操作過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的重視程度不高、錯(cuò)誤不斷、各地標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不統(tǒng)一的問(wèn)題;如何處理裁判文書公開(kāi)后侵犯?jìng)�(gè)人隱私權(quán)的問(wèn)題;如何處理裁判文書公開(kāi)后可能引發(fā)的民眾不同意見(jiàn)的問(wèn)題。公正的思想作為馬克思主義理論的一個(gè)極其重要的組成部分,也是馬克思主義的重要指導(dǎo)思想之一。在馬克思主義中國(guó)化的進(jìn)程中,公平正義這一價(jià)值追求始終貫穿其中,它也是我們實(shí)行依法治國(guó)、建設(shè)法治社會(huì)、使全體人民共享改革發(fā)展成果的指導(dǎo)思想。在我們波瀾壯闊的革命、建設(shè)和改革的歷史進(jìn)程中發(fā)揮了巨大的理論指導(dǎo)作用。因此,文章擬在馬克思主義公正觀的指導(dǎo)下,將裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)作為碩士論文的研究課題,結(jié)合目前我國(guó)法院在文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)中的現(xiàn)狀與存在問(wèn)題,運(yùn)用文獻(xiàn)分析法、實(shí)證研究法、比較研究法對(duì)裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)這一問(wèn)題進(jìn)行全面、系統(tǒng)的研究,以期為該制度的不斷完善和健全提出一些個(gè)人的意見(jiàn)和建議。本文主要分六個(gè)部分對(duì)這一制度進(jìn)行論述,第一部分是對(duì)馬克思主義公正觀的主要內(nèi)容進(jìn)行介紹,然后通過(guò)論述公開(kāi)一詞與公正一詞的關(guān)系,說(shuō)明公開(kāi)對(duì)于公正的重要意義;第二部分講裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)的現(xiàn)實(shí)必要性以及文書進(jìn)行上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)后所產(chǎn)生的意義;第三部分是裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)的發(fā)展概況,這其中包括我國(guó)在不同的歷史時(shí)期的發(fā)展概況,同時(shí)也包括其他國(guó)外法治程度發(fā)展水平較高的國(guó)家的發(fā)展情況,為下文分析我國(guó)當(dāng)前裁判文書在互聯(lián)網(wǎng)上公開(kāi)存在的問(wèn)題以及不足做鋪墊;第四部分是我國(guó)裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)的運(yùn)行狀況及缺陷,通過(guò)實(shí)證分析方法,找出當(dāng)前裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)存在的問(wèn)題和困境;第五部分是我國(guó)裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)存在問(wèn)題的原因分析,從制作主體、制度建設(shè)、權(quán)利保障、輿情應(yīng)對(duì)、監(jiān)督問(wèn)責(zé)五個(gè)方面展開(kāi);第六部分是我國(guó)裁判文書上網(wǎng)制度的完善,基于目前我國(guó)裁判文書上網(wǎng)在實(shí)際運(yùn)行過(guò)程當(dāng)中存在的諸多問(wèn)題和不足,從多個(gè)方面分析出現(xiàn)問(wèn)題的關(guān)鍵所在,并提出具體合理的改良方案。
[Abstract]:As a legal document with national coercive force, the judgment document is made by the court according to the facts of the case and the application of relevant laws. It is the key link in the whole trial process, and also the concentrated embodiment of the whole trial process. Therefore, its importance is self-evident and important. For a long time, the degree and scope of the publicity of the judicial documents have a great influence on the degree of the realization of the open trial. As a principle clearly stipulated in the Constitution, the publicity of the judicial documents must be adhered to and implemented conscientiously. Not only that, but also the fairness of judicial activities can be monitored, which is conducive to the realization of judicial justice and social justice. Today, with the rapid development of technology, the Internet provides a new way for the publicity of judicial documents. Under the background of the innovation of communication and media, the publication of judicial documents through the Internet has inevitably become the mainstream trend of the publication and publication of judicial documents to the society. For a long time, in order to make the publication of judicial documents more popular in the whole country. In recent years, the Supreme People's Court has successively promulgated a number of normative documents on the publicity of judicial documents, including "Several Opinions on Strengthening the Openness of Trials by the People's Court", "Six Provisions on the Openness of Judicial Procedures" and "Several Provisions on the Publication of Judicial Documents by the People's Court on the Internet". However, with the development of society, there are still many blind spots and blanks in the process of implementation. For example, how to solve the problems of low attention, unceasing errors and inconsistent standards in the process of operation of online publicity of judicial documents in judicial practice; how to deal with the publicity of judicial documents How to deal with the public's disagreement after the publication of the judgment documents? As an extremely important part of Marxist theory, the idea of justice is also one of the important guiding ideology of Marxism. In the process of the Sinicization of Marxism, the idea of Justice The pursuit of value runs through it all the time. It is also the guiding ideology for us to administer the country according to law, build a society ruled by law, and make all the people share the fruits of reform and development. As a research topic of master's thesis, the online publicity of judicial documents is comprehensively and systematically studied by means of literature analysis, empirical research and comparative study, combining with the current situation and existing problems in the online publicity of judicial documents in China's courts, with a view to improving and perfecting the system. This paper mainly discusses the system in six parts. The first part introduces the main content of Marxist justice, and then explains the importance of publicity to justice by discussing the relationship between the word publicity and the word justice; the second part talks about the manifestation of the online publicity of judicial documents. The third part is the general situation of the development of the online publicity of the judicial documents, which includes the general situation of the development of China in different historical periods, and also includes the development of other countries with a higher level of development of the rule of law abroad, so as to analyze the current judicial documents in China. The problems and inadequacies of publishing books on the Internet lay the groundwork; the fourth part is the operation status and deficiencies of online publicity of judicial documents in China, through empirical analysis, to find out the current problems and difficulties of online publicity of judicial documents; the fifth part is the reasons for the problems of online publicity of judicial documents in China, from the production. The sixth part is the perfection of the online system of judicial documents in China. Based on the problems and deficiencies existing in the actual operation process of the online system of judicial documents in China, this paper analyzes the key to the problems from many aspects and puts forward concrete and reasonable suggestions. Improvement plan.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：曲阜師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.13;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馬超;于曉虹;何海波;;大數(shù)據(jù)分析:中國(guó)司法裁判文書上網(wǎng)公開(kāi)報(bào)告[J];中國(guó)法律評(píng)論;2016年04期

2 趙瑞罡;陳碧玉;;文書上網(wǎng)背景下“后裁判效應(yīng)”的理性應(yīng)對(duì)[J];法律適用;2015年08期

3 王晨光;;借助司法公開(kāi)深化司法改革[J];法律適用;2014年03期

4 薛曉蔚;薛雨芊;;關(guān)于裁判文書網(wǎng)上公開(kāi)問(wèn)題的思考[J];中國(guó)人民公安大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年06期

5 黃忠;;隱私權(quán)視野下的網(wǎng)上公開(kāi)裁判文書之限[J];北方法學(xué);2012年06期

6 李友根;;裁判文書公開(kāi)與當(dāng)事人隱私權(quán)保護(hù)[J];法學(xué);2010年05期

7 汪盛玉;;馬克思社會(huì)公正觀的基本內(nèi)涵[J];教學(xué)與研究;2010年05期

8 張文顯;;人民法院司法改革的基本理論與實(shí)踐進(jìn)程[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2009年03期

9 李嬋媛;;尋找“公開(kāi)審判”的黃金分割點(diǎn)[J];湖南公安高等�？茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2008年05期

10 張浩書;朱梅芳;;裁判文書網(wǎng)上公開(kāi)問(wèn)題研究——現(xiàn)代司法理念與司法實(shí)踐的碰撞及其整合[J];金陵法律評(píng)論;2007年02期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 佘穎;;以司法公開(kāi)促進(jìn)司法公正[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2016年

2 艾智杰;王t熛，

本文編號(hào)：2192510