【摘要】：檢察機(jī)關(guān)法律監(jiān)督是保障我國(guó)憲法和法律實(shí)施的有效機(jī)制。法律監(jiān)督權(quán)是保障這一核心機(jī)制得到切實(shí)發(fā)揮功能的核心術(shù)語(yǔ)。理論上對(duì)法律監(jiān)督及法律監(jiān)督權(quán)的探討有益于進(jìn)一步完善法律監(jiān)督權(quán)制度。檢察機(jī)關(guān)履行法律監(jiān)督權(quán)能夠推進(jìn)維護(hù)法律統(tǒng)一實(shí)施目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)，是構(gòu)建現(xiàn)代法治國(guó)家的重要保障力量。在中國(guó)社會(huì)主義法律體系已經(jīng)形成的今天，，注重法律的有效實(shí)施離不開(kāi)法律監(jiān)督機(jī)制，我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)及其法律監(jiān)督權(quán)是符合法治建設(shè)需要的制度構(gòu)建。 當(dāng)然，本文還缺乏進(jìn)一步的實(shí)證調(diào)查研究以全面展現(xiàn)檢察機(jī)關(guān)法律監(jiān)督的現(xiàn)狀與迫切需要解決的問(wèn)題。但是有關(guān)法律監(jiān)督理論的探討終究還是具體制度實(shí)踐的先導(dǎo)，本文的主要目的是為了在認(rèn)識(shí)與重構(gòu)法律監(jiān)督權(quán)制度上作出努力。
[Abstract]:The procuratorial organ's legal supervision is an effective mechanism to guarantee the constitution and law enforcement of our country. The right of legal supervision is the core term to ensure that this core mechanism is given full play to its function. The discussion on the legal supervision and the legal supervision power is beneficial to the further improvement of the legal supervision power system. The procuratorial organ to fulfill the legal supervision power can promote the realization of the goal of maintaining the unified implementation of the law and is an important guarantee force for the construction of a modern country ruled by law. Today, when China's socialist legal system has been formed, the effective implementation of the law can not be separated from the legal supervision mechanism. The procuratorial organ and its legal supervisory power in China are the system construction that meets the needs of the construction of the rule of law. Of course, this paper also lacks further empirical investigation and research to show the current situation of procuratorial organs' legal supervision and the urgent problems that need to be solved. However, the discussion on the theory of legal supervision is still the forerunner of the practice of specific systems. The main purpose of this paper is to make efforts in understanding and reconstructing the system of legal supervision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：D926.3

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 聶曉生;馬曉梅;成華;;檢察權(quán)的配置與司法體制改革[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年05期

2 李國(guó)明;晏向華;;論檢察機(jī)關(guān)法律監(jiān)督權(quán)的法理和現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2011年06期

3 賀衛(wèi)方;解讀檢察體制改革之難[J];中國(guó)司法;2004年01期

4 章武生;;我國(guó)政治體制改革的最佳突破口:司法體制改革[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

5 周其華;檢察法律監(jiān)督幾個(gè)問(wèn)題的研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年04期

6 謝鵬程;論檢察官獨(dú)立與檢察一體[J];法學(xué)雜志;2003年03期

7 梁景明;;論法律監(jiān)督的二重性——基于法治和政治二場(chǎng)域的討論[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年01期

8 徐爽;韓健;;中國(guó)檢察制度歷史變遷之回顧[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年03期

9 張智輝;;法律監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)設(shè)置的價(jià)值合理性[J];法學(xué)家;2002年05期

10 李桂茂,鄒建章,張國(guó)吉;論檢察機(jī)關(guān)法律監(jiān)督權(quán)立法的缺陷與完善[J];法學(xué);1996年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王守安;檢察裁量權(quán)論[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2008年

2 張寧;當(dāng)代中國(guó)檢察理念的創(chuàng)新與發(fā)展[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

本文編號(hào)：2159678