本文選題：司法職業(yè)化 + 理論和歷史依據(jù)��； 參考：《陜西師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：一個國家法治建設(shè)的深入,必然伴隨著司法改革的不斷探索。改革開放以來我國進(jìn)入了社會轉(zhuǎn)型期,高速發(fā)展和高度風(fēng)險并存,利益多元和矛盾多發(fā)并存,是否繼續(xù)堅持司法改革職業(yè)化的方向引發(fā)了理論界、實踐界的探討。本文擬從司法職業(yè)化的界定入手,分析司法職業(yè)化的理論和歷史依據(jù),并借鑒有關(guān)國家司法職業(yè)制度的經(jīng)驗,立足我國轉(zhuǎn)型期的社會現(xiàn)實和基本國情,探討和研究轉(zhuǎn)型期中國司法職業(yè)化的理據(jù),以期為司法改革職業(yè)化的深入提供理論支撐。 本文的內(nèi)容包括緒論、正文和結(jié)論在內(nèi),共分為六章。 第一章為“緒論”。首先,介紹了本文的研究背景、選題的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義；其次,對國內(nèi)外相關(guān)論題的研究現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行梳理；最后,對論文中用到的主要研究方法進(jìn)行了介紹,另外也指出本文的創(chuàng)新點,并認(rèn)識到論證的不足之處。 第二章“司法職業(yè)化的界定”。對職業(yè)化、法律職業(yè)化、司法職業(yè)化進(jìn)行了分析,并討論了“司法職業(yè)化”與“司法專業(yè)化”、“司法精英化”等相關(guān)概念的關(guān)系。 第三章“司法職業(yè)化的理論和歷史依據(jù)”。首先,研究了司法職業(yè)化的理論史據(jù),從分權(quán)學(xué)說和職業(yè)主義兩個理論入手,分析司法職業(yè)化在法學(xué)理論史上的依據(jù)；第二,從司法權(quán)的本原引出司法的價值,通過邏輯分析得出司法獨立、司法公正和司法效率——作為司法權(quán)與生俱來的價值——都需要司法職業(yè)化；第三,按照歷史演進(jìn)的順序,考察司法職業(yè)化的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展脈絡(luò)。 第四章“有關(guān)國家司法職業(yè)制度的經(jīng)驗借鑒”。通過對英國、美國、德國和日本四國的司法職業(yè)制度進(jìn)行評析,得出其共性是職業(yè)化程度較高,在司法過程中民意參與需要嚴(yán)格規(guī)制等,總結(jié)了我國的可借鑒之處。 第五章“轉(zhuǎn)型期中國司法職業(yè)化的現(xiàn)實基礎(chǔ)和需要”。首先,梳理了我國轉(zhuǎn)型期司法職業(yè)化的歷史進(jìn)程,對轉(zhuǎn)型期進(jìn)行了界定并回顧了轉(zhuǎn)型期中國司法改革職業(yè)化的歷史進(jìn)程；其次,結(jié)合轉(zhuǎn)型期中國社會的特點,分析了對司法改革所處的時代環(huán)境；最后,指出轉(zhuǎn)型期中國司法改革需要堅持職業(yè)化道路,從目前司法實踐中面臨的一些問題入手,分析其與民主化的可通約性。 第六章為“結(jié)論”。對全文進(jìn)行總結(jié),指出轉(zhuǎn)型期中國需要堅持司法改革職業(yè)化取向,對職業(yè)化與司法神秘感、司法民主的矛盾進(jìn)行分析解決。
[Abstract]:The construction of a country's rule of law must be accompanied by the constant exploration of judicial reform. Since the reform and opening to the outside world, our country has entered a period of social transformation, with the coexistence of high speed development and high risk, multiple interests and multiple contradictions. Whether we should continue to adhere to the direction of professionalization of judicial reform has led to the discussion of the theoretical and practical circles. This paper begins with the definition of judicial professionalization, analyzes the theoretical and historical basis of judicial professionalization, and draws lessons from the experience of the national judicial professional system, and bases itself on the social reality and basic national conditions in the transition period of our country. In order to provide theoretical support for the professionalization of judicial reform, this paper probes into the motivation of judicial professionalization in China during the transition period. The content of this paper includes introduction, text and conclusion, which is divided into six chapters. The first chapter is introduction. First of all, it introduces the research background, the theoretical and practical significance of the topic; secondly, the research status of related topics at home and abroad are combed; finally, the main research methods used in the paper are introduced. In addition, it also points out the innovation of this paper, and recognizes the shortcomings of the argumentation. The second chapter is the definition of judicial professionalization. This paper analyzes the professionalization, the professionalization of the law and the professionalization of the judicature, and discusses the relationship among the concepts of "professionalization of the judiciary", "judicial specialization", "judicial excellence" and so on. The third chapter is the theory and historical basis of judicial professionalization. First of all, it studies the theoretical history of judicial professionalization, analyzes the basis of judicial professionalization in the history of legal theory from the theory of separation of powers and the theory of professionalism; second, it leads to the value of justice from the origin of judicial power. Through logical analysis, it is concluded that judicial independence, judicial justice and judicial efficiency, as the inherent value of judicial power, all need judicial professionalization. Thirdly, according to the order of historical evolution, the emergence and development of judicial professionalization are investigated. The fourth chapter is about the experience of the national judicial professional system. Through the analysis of the judicial professional systems of Britain, the United States, Germany and Japan, it is concluded that the commonness of the system is the high degree of professionalization, and the participation of public opinion in the judicial process needs strict regulation, and summarizes the points that our country can use for reference. The fifth chapter is the realistic foundation and need of judicial professionalization in China during the transition period. First of all, it combs the historical process of judicial professionalization in the transitional period of our country, defines the transition period and reviews the historical process of the professionalization of judicial reform in China in the transitional period; secondly, it combines the characteristics of the Chinese society in the transition period. Finally, the author points out that China's judicial reform needs to adhere to the road of professionalization in the transitional period, starting with some problems in the current judicial practice, and analyzes its compatibility with democratization. The sixth chapter is the conclusion. This paper summarizes the full text and points out that China should adhere to the orientation of professionalization of judicial reform and analyze and resolve the contradictions between professionalization and judicial mystery and judicial democracy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范愉;;當(dāng)代中國法律職業(yè)化路徑選擇——一個比較法社會學(xué)的研究[J];北方法學(xué);2007年02期

2 王迎龍;;日本裁判員制度——通往司法民主的橋梁[J];北京政法職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2010年02期

3 陳忠林;;司法民主是司法公正的根本保證[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年05期

4 公丕祥;;當(dāng)代中國司法改革的時代進(jìn)程[J];法制資訊;2009年02期

5 謝暉;從計劃經(jīng)濟(jì)到市場經(jīng)濟(jì)：法理的革命[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;1994年04期

6 劉青峰,李長軍;現(xiàn)代司法理念與我國司法管理體制的重構(gòu)[J];河北法學(xué);2004年12期

7 孫麗君;;司法的悖論——司法的民主化與司法的精英化之矛盾探究[J];河北法學(xué);2007年04期

8 齊樹潔;;論外國司法改革經(jīng)驗之借鑒[J];江蘇行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

9 趙曉力;司法過程與民主過程[J];法學(xué)研究;2004年04期

10 張千帆;;回到司法改革的真問題[J];南風(fēng)窗;2009年07期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前10條

1 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授法學(xué)博士范愉;[N];法制日報;2002年

2 西南政法大學(xué)法學(xué)院院長 陳忠林;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報;2008年

3 北京大學(xué)憲法學(xué)教授 張千帆;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報;2008年

4 高一飛;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報;2008年

5 中國政法大學(xué)教授 何兵;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報;2008年

6 浙江大學(xué)光華法學(xué)院教授 賀衛(wèi)方;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報;2008年

7 一刀三;[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)觀察報;2008年

8 賀衛(wèi)方;[N];人民法院報;2002年

9 北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院教授、博士生導(dǎo)師 賀衛(wèi)方;[N];人民法院報;2002年

10 賀衛(wèi)方;[N];南方周末;2008年

，

本文編號：2077732