本文選題：媒體審判 + 司法獨立�。� 參考：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：在法治的不斷完善和發(fā)展的今天,司法也受到了人們越來越多的關(guān)注,民眾需要司法公開的呼聲也是愈演愈烈。在這種社會背景下,新聞媒體在監(jiān)督司法、促進司法公正、披露司法腐敗、培養(yǎng)公民法治觀念等方面起到了無可替代的作用。而媒體也被民眾寄予厚望,媒體監(jiān)督在遏制司法腐敗方面起到了至關(guān)重要的作用。雖然新聞媒體的首要任務(wù)便是客觀公正,但是難免會受到利益的誘惑以及不同價值觀念的影響。新聞媒體當(dāng)然可以體現(xiàn)民意,但與此同時也很有可能誤導(dǎo)民意。法院一旦處于這種被新聞媒體所誤導(dǎo)的民意壓力下,就有可能在強大的壓力面前喪失審判的公正性和獨立性。 媒體監(jiān)督是一把雙刃劍,可以使案件走向公正和民主,但也可能促使案件的判決出現(xiàn)問題。媒體并非直接對法院產(chǎn)生壓力,而是通過領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人和輿論對法院產(chǎn)生壓力。而且,很多媒體在報道事件時已經(jīng)有了鮮明的立場,往往分析問題也僅僅是站在一方當(dāng)事人的立場上,這就很有可能會誤導(dǎo)對事件真相不太了解的觀眾。法律是以事實為依據(jù),講求證據(jù)；而大眾輿論多數(shù)則是對弱者過分同情,講求道義,這樣就會引起一種法不容情的假象,讓廣大民眾產(chǎn)生了對法律的厭惡,以為法律太過殘酷,忽視了人道。因此,媒體應(yīng)該回歸自身的一種特性,那就是盡量保持中立的立場去報道任何一個事件,不要預(yù)先對一件事情作出結(jié)論。雖然傳媒對司法的監(jiān)督有助于發(fā)現(xiàn)錯案冤情,防止司法腐敗,維護法官的操守。但是,這并不代表媒體可以無所限制地介入司法領(lǐng)域,甚至影響司法活動的獨立開展。否則,傳媒不但起不到促進司法公正、監(jiān)督司法的目的,反而會因為過分干涉而使得司法公正遭到踐踏。同樣,這也不代表司法部門可以隨意剝奪媒體的監(jiān)督權(quán),將正當(dāng)?shù)男侣劜稍L拒之門外。
[Abstract]:With the continuous improvement and development of the rule of law, people pay more and more attention to the administration of justice. In this social background, the news media plays an irreplaceable role in supervising justice, promoting judicial justice, disclosing judicial corruption and cultivating citizens' concept of rule of law. The media is also highly expected of the public, media supervision has played a vital role in curbing judicial corruption. Although the primary task of news media is to be objective and impartial, it is inevitable to be influenced by interest and different values. The news media, of course, can reflect public opinion, but at the same time it is likely to mislead public opinion. Once the court is under the pressure of public opinion misled by the news media, it may lose the impartiality and independence of the trial in the face of strong pressure. Media supervision is a double-edged sword, which can make the case move towards justice and democracy, but it may also cause the judgment of the case to appear a problem. The media exert pressure on the court not directly, but through leaders and public opinion. Moreover, many media have already had a clear position in reporting the incident, often the analysis of the problem is only the position of one party, which is likely to mislead the audience who do not know the truth of the incident. The law is based on facts and emphasizes evidence; and the majority of public opinion is too sympathetic to the weak and moral. This will give rise to the false impression that the law is not in good taste, causing the general public to detest the law and think that the law is too cruel. Humanity is ignored. Therefore, the media should return to its own characteristic, that is, to maintain a neutral position to report any event, do not prejudge a matter. Although the media supervision of the judiciary helps to find wrongs, prevent judicial corruption, and uphold the integrity of judges. However, this does not mean that the media can intervene in the judicial field without restriction, or even affect the independent development of judicial activities. Otherwise, the media will not only fail to promote judicial justice and supervise justice, but will trample on judicial justice because of excessive interference. Nor does it mean that the judiciary can arbitrarily deprive the media of supervision and shut out legitimate news interviews.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉玉民;國外處理媒體與司法沖突的立法和實踐[J];北京觀察;2005年06期

2 干朝端,楊凱;公開報道與公平審判的沖突與平衡 兼論現(xiàn)代司法理念與傳媒道德觀念的溝通與融合[J];法律適用;2005年01期

3 謝苗苗;;論“媒體審判”與司法獨立[J];法制與社會;2008年15期

4 陳萍;;傳媒與司法關(guān)系之探究——媒體審判正當(dāng)性之法理分析[J];法制與社會;2009年10期

5 路鵑;;論“媒介審判”現(xiàn)象的負面效應(yīng)與防范[J];甘肅社會科學(xué);2009年05期

6 張英霞;;“媒體審判”的防治[J];法制與社會發(fā)展;2008年05期

7 吳秋余;;對“媒介審判”現(xiàn)象的分析[J];新聞戰(zhàn)線;2007年05期

8 卞建林;媒體監(jiān)督與司法公正[J];政法論壇;2000年06期

9 方明杰;王治軍;;試論媒體監(jiān)督與司法獨立[J];政法學(xué)刊;2007年02期

10 周澤;“媒體審判”、“輿論審判”檢討[J];中國青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 火煜雯;論司法獨立與媒體監(jiān)督的關(guān)系[D];南京師范大學(xué);2006年

2 陶穎瑩;司法與傳媒的良性互動機制研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

3 王瑾;公眾判意的法理研究[D];山西大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2035041