本文選題：法院 + 司法能力　； 參考：《武漢大學(xué)》2012年博士論文

【摘要】：本文研究的是在現(xiàn)有階段和現(xiàn)有體制下,中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的法院司法能力建設(shè)的基本理論、基本狀況、基本結(jié)構(gòu)和基本結(jié)論。通過(guò)對(duì)法院司法能力建設(shè)問(wèn)題的探源和梳理,探尋對(duì)中國(guó)法院司法能力建設(shè)有所裨益的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和指導(dǎo)。 緒論部分交代本文研究問(wèn)題的緣起和研究意圖、學(xué)術(shù)的起點(diǎn)、研究的有利條件、研究的難點(diǎn)、學(xué)術(shù)創(chuàng)新、本文基本設(shè)想、內(nèi)容安排和研究方法等。 第一章為法院司法能力建設(shè)一般理論(上)。著重研究權(quán)力及其產(chǎn)生的主客觀條件,提出權(quán)力的六個(gè)特征,在此基礎(chǔ)上明確權(quán)力基本理論對(duì)法院司法能力建設(shè)的指導(dǎo)作用：法院司法能力建設(shè)應(yīng)以權(quán)力本質(zhì)特征為基礎(chǔ)；應(yīng)符合法治方向；應(yīng)有正確的法學(xué)理論指導(dǎo)；必須揚(yáng)棄中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)政治并符合現(xiàn)有國(guó)情；也應(yīng)注重社會(huì)權(quán)力發(fā)展的趨勢(shì)。 第二章為法院能力建設(shè)一般理論(下)。著重研究司法權(quán)的政治地位、作用,與政黨關(guān)系,以及司法權(quán)的概念特性,司法權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu),提出司法權(quán)的功能、本質(zhì)和特征、司法權(quán)的價(jià)值取向和評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),從而明確法院司法能力建設(shè)的司法權(quán)基礎(chǔ)理論。 第三章為法院司法能力建設(shè)的基本情況。著重研究人民法院司法能力建設(shè)的政權(quán)基礎(chǔ),司法權(quán)關(guān)系,司法能力建設(shè)的歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)教訓(xùn)和評(píng)價(jià),以及司法能力建設(shè)的現(xiàn)實(shí)評(píng)價(jià)和原因分析。 第四章為法院司法能力建設(shè)的基本結(jié)構(gòu)。著重研究了法院職能定位,現(xiàn)行體制機(jī)制、組織結(jié)構(gòu)等基本情況,提出了司法能力建設(shè)的基本原則,內(nèi)容、推進(jìn)方法和能力建設(shè)的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和機(jī)制。 第五章法院司法能力建設(shè)的基本結(jié)論。經(jīng)過(guò)從理論、歷史、現(xiàn)實(shí)情況的研究,提出的基本結(jié)論是：(1)人民法院司法能力建設(shè)迎來(lái)了難得發(fā)展的歷史機(jī)遇,人民法院也面臨著緊迫的壓力；(2)司法能力建設(shè)應(yīng)當(dāng)堅(jiān)持中國(guó)共產(chǎn)黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的基本原則；(3)、司法能力建設(shè)應(yīng)當(dāng)符合司法權(quán)力的內(nèi)在本質(zhì)要求,明確司法權(quán)的價(jià)值導(dǎo)向,堅(jiān)持法治方向不動(dòng)搖；(4)司法能力建設(shè)的成效取決于體制機(jī)制保障,并要求系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì),重點(diǎn)推進(jìn)。當(dāng)前重點(diǎn)抓好的機(jī)制建設(shè)是政治方向保障機(jī)制；依法審判保障機(jī)制；司法管轄的保障機(jī)制；法官人事管理保障機(jī)制；法院文化建設(shè)保障機(jī)制；物質(zhì)經(jīng)費(fèi)保障機(jī)制；司法公開(kāi)和司法監(jiān)督保障機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:This paper studies the basic theories, basic conditions, basic structure and basic conclusions of the judicial capacity construction of the courts led by the Communist Party of China in the present stage and under the present system. Through exploring the source and sorting out the problem of judicial capacity construction of the court, the author explores the experience and guidance that will benefit the judicial capacity construction of Chinese court. The introduction part explains the origin and intention of the research, the starting point of the academic research, the favorable conditions of the research, the difficulty of the research, the academic innovation, the basic assumption of this article, the content arrangement and the research method, etc. The first chapter is the general theory of judicial capacity building of the court. This paper focuses on the study of power and its subjective and objective conditions, and puts forward six characteristics of power. On this basis, it makes clear the guiding role of the basic theory of power to the construction of the judicial capacity of the court: the building of judicial capacity of the court should be based on the essential characteristics of power; It should conform to the direction of the rule of law; should be guided by correct legal theory; must discard the traditional Chinese politics and conform to the existing national conditions; and should also pay attention to the trend of the development of social power. The second chapter is the general theory of court capacity building. Focusing on the political status, role, relationship with political parties, the concept and characteristics of judicial power, the structure of judicial power, the function, nature and characteristics of judicial power, the value orientation and evaluation criteria of judicial power, So as to clarify the basic theory of judicial power in the judicial capacity building of the court. The third chapter is the basic situation of the judicial capacity building of the court. This paper focuses on the political power foundation of judicial capacity construction of people's court, the relationship of judicial power, the historical experience and evaluation of judicial capacity construction, and the realistic evaluation and reason analysis of judicial capacity construction. The fourth chapter is the basic structure of the judicial capacity building of the court. This paper focuses on the function orientation of the court, the current system and mechanism, and the organizational structure, and puts forward the basic principles, contents, methods and evaluation criteria and mechanisms of the judicial capacity building. The fifth chapter is the basic conclusion of the judicial capacity building of the court. Through the study of theory, history and reality, the basic conclusion is that the judicial capacity construction of the people's court has ushered in a rare historical opportunity for development, and the people's court is also facing urgent pressure. (2) the construction of judicial capacity should adhere to the basic principle of the leadership of the Communist Party of China, and the building of judicial capacity should conform to the inherent essential requirements of judicial power, clarify the value orientation of judicial power, and adhere to the direction of rule by law; 4) the effectiveness of judicial capacity building depends on the institutional mechanism, and requires systematic design and emphasis. At present, the key mechanism is the political direction guarantee mechanism, the legal trial guarantee mechanism, the judicial jurisdiction guarantee mechanism, the judge personnel management safeguard mechanism, the court culture construction safeguard mechanism, the material fund safeguard mechanism; Judicial publicity and judicial supervision guarantee mechanism.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董和平;論憲法的價(jià)值及其評(píng)價(jià)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);1999年02期

2 魏迪;;基本權(quán)利的國(guó)家保護(hù)義務(wù)——以德、中兩國(guó)為審視對(duì)象[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2007年04期

3 董娟;胡國(guó)勝;;行政分權(quán)下的政府間縱向權(quán)力配置——改革開(kāi)放30年來(lái)我國(guó)中央與地方的行政分權(quán)[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2008年07期

4 徐國(guó)棟;尋找丟失的人格——從羅馬、德國(guó)、拉丁法族國(guó)家、前蘇聯(lián)、俄羅斯到中國(guó)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年06期

5 王申;法官的審判理念與實(shí)踐[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年04期

6 鄭賢君;;作為客觀價(jià)值秩序的基本權(quán)——從德國(guó)法看基本權(quán)保障義務(wù)[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

7 郭道暉;實(shí)行司法獨(dú)立與遏制司法腐敗[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

8 黃勤武;;現(xiàn)代司法理念的反思——對(duì)照鄧正來(lái)先生《中國(guó)法學(xué)向何處去》的檢視[J];福建法學(xué);2007年04期

9 王廣輝,陳根強(qiáng);試論政府的憲法責(zé)任[J];法商研究;2003年03期

10 姜小川;中國(guó)司法改革動(dòng)因檢視[J];法學(xué)雜志;2005年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：2034700