本文選題：律師調(diào)解 + 角色理論�。� 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：作為法律共同體的一員,律師在法律生活中扮演著多重角色。在調(diào)解過程中,律師站在不同的立場,扮演不同的角色,實施不同的行為與策略,將會帶來不同的糾紛解決結(jié)果。當(dāng)前的律師調(diào)解實踐存在兩種模式。一種是建立單獨的律師調(diào)解機(jī)構(gòu),律師在其中以獨立身份掌控著調(diào)解全過程,例如“青島律師調(diào)解中心”;另一種是律師以個體身份內(nèi)嵌到其他調(diào)解機(jī)構(gòu)中,以共同合作的方式來主持調(diào)解,其典型代表是“深圳福田模式”。在調(diào)解中,法院、政府機(jī)關(guān)、糾紛當(dāng)事人、律師事務(wù)所,以及律師皆是調(diào)解的參與主體。但是源于各個主體自身需求差異,其對律師在調(diào)解中的角色與作用的認(rèn)識各不相同,期待不盡一致。律師在其主導(dǎo)或主持的調(diào)解中分別扮演著“法院受托者、政府合伙人、當(dāng)事人的服務(wù)員、律師事務(wù)所的業(yè)務(wù)員,以及調(diào)解的組織者”這五種角色。這些角色在反映調(diào)解主體間需求差異的同時也給律師調(diào)解帶來諸多角色問題。法律規(guī)范的不健全和調(diào)解當(dāng)事人的立場波動使得律師在調(diào)解中缺乏明確的行為依據(jù),造成律師調(diào)解的角色期待不明;人情關(guān)系的傾斜和制度約束給律師在調(diào)解中建立牢固的角色信任關(guān)系帶來重重阻礙;司法資源稀缺情境下的民眾與律師在調(diào)解觀念上的鴻溝使得律師在角色認(rèn)識上產(chǎn)生偏差;律師自身對調(diào)解的理解,政府、法院對律師身份及地位的限制使得律師常常遭遇角色選擇上的沖突。因此運(yùn)用“角色理論”分析律師在調(diào)解中的角色結(jié)構(gòu)、功能和互動過程,辨明律師在調(diào)解中的角色關(guān)系,對構(gòu)建有序的律師調(diào)解機(jī)制就有著重要意義。在律師調(diào)解機(jī)制的建立過程中需要注意兩個方面,一是發(fā)揮律師協(xié)會對律師的管理培訓(xùn)職能,促使律師在調(diào)解中及時轉(zhuǎn)換角色,厘清自身的角色定位;二是改善人文和經(jīng)濟(jì)環(huán)境,對律師參加調(diào)解給與更多的社會寬容和財政支持,在制度上設(shè)定好律師調(diào)解的權(quán)利邊界,明確其角色期待。
[Abstract]:As a member of the legal community, lawyers play many roles in legal life. In the process of mediation, lawyers stand in different positions, play different roles and implement different behaviors and strategies, which will lead to different results of dispute resolution. There are two models in the practice of lawyer mediation. One is the establishment of a separate lawyer mediation agency, in which lawyers control the entire mediation process in an independent capacity, such as the Qingdao lawyers Mediation Center; the other is that lawyers are embedded in other mediation institutions as individuals. The typical representative of mediation is Shenzhen Futian Model. In mediation, courts, government agencies, parties to disputes, law firms, and lawyers are all involved in mediation. However, due to the different needs of different subjects, their understanding of the role and role of lawyers in mediation is different and their expectations are different. Lawyers play the roles of court trustee, government partner, waiter of client, clerk of law firm and organizer of mediation. These roles not only reflect the different needs of mediators, but also bring many problems to lawyer mediation. The imperfect legal norms and the fluctuation of the position of the mediating parties make the lawyers lack clear basis of conduct in the mediation, resulting in the role of lawyers in mediation is not clear; The inclination of the human relationship and the restriction of the system bring many obstacles to the lawyer to establish the solid trust relationship in the mediation, the gap between the public and the lawyer in the concept of mediation in the situation of scarce judicial resources makes the lawyer deviate in the understanding of the role. The lawyer's own understanding of mediation and the restriction of the lawyer's status and status by the government and the court make the lawyer often encounter conflict in the choice of his role. Therefore, it is of great significance to analyze the role structure, function and interactive process of lawyer in mediation by "role theory", and to distinguish the role relationship of lawyer in mediation, which is of great significance to the construction of orderly lawyer mediation mechanism. In the process of establishing the lawyer mediation mechanism, two aspects should be paid attention to. One is to give full play to the lawyer's management training function of the lawyers' association, to urge the lawyer to change his role in time in the mediation, and to clarify his own role orientation; The second is to improve the human and economic environment, to give more social tolerance and financial support to lawyers to participate in mediation, to set the right boundary of lawyer mediation in the system, and to clarify their role expectations.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周望;;大調(diào)解、維穩(wěn)與社會治理:功能解釋及限度——南通大調(diào)解再認(rèn)識[J];鄭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2016年04期

2 楊宜勇;;福田模式的四個特點[J];人民論壇;2016年03期

3 高長永;;治安調(diào)解的經(jīng)濟(jì)分析[J];北京警察學(xué)院學(xué)報;2016年01期

4 趙浚;;關(guān)懷倫理:儒家德性倫理的有效生長點[J];宜賓學(xué)院學(xué)報;2015年05期

5 劉思達(dá);;中國法律的形狀[J];中外法學(xué);2014年04期

6 林丹瑞;;淺析律師參與調(diào)解的價值與優(yōu)勢[J];法制與社會;2014年14期

7 房旭;;論律師主持下的調(diào)解[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報;2014年02期

8 黃文藝;宋湘琦;;法律商業(yè)主義解析[J];法商研究;2014年01期

9 ;廣東律師進(jìn)村居服務(wù)將于2020年實現(xiàn)全省全覆蓋[J];中國律師;2013年10期

10 欒少湖;;律師調(diào)解:從配角轉(zhuǎn)為主角的五年——來自青島律師調(diào)解中心的報告[J];中國律師;2012年02期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前6條

1 呂紅兵;;讓律師在多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制中擔(dān)當(dāng)新角色[N];人民法院報;2016年

2 陳偉鵬 ;梁楚欣 ;;律師進(jìn)駐村居 糾紛調(diào)解見效[N];佛山日報;2013年

3 張曙;;重視律師作用 促進(jìn)“大調(diào)解”格局形成[N];人民政協(xié)報;2013年

4 丁國鋒;;調(diào)解已成泰州律師常規(guī)業(yè)務(wù)[N];法制日報;2011年

5 游春亮;;政府出錢請來律師參與調(diào)解[N];法制日報;2009年

6 劉偉;李亞男;;政府購買服務(wù)引入律師參與調(diào)解[N];深圳特區(qū)報;2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條

1 顏明婷;律師進(jìn)社區(qū)擔(dān)任法律顧問的現(xiàn)狀及優(yōu)化措施研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2014年

2 劉萌;律師主導(dǎo)型調(diào)解模式研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

3 張君燕;律師參與社會矛盾化解的路徑研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2014年

4 王媛媛;論我國調(diào)解人法律制度[D];安徽大學(xué);2011年

5 全俊達(dá);我國律師參與型調(diào)解機(jī)制研究[D];中國政法大學(xué);2010年

6 肖文斌;律師調(diào)解制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2010年

7 焦武峰;論法社會學(xué)視野中的律師角色[D];蘇州大學(xué);2004年

8 王鐳;論法治社會中的律師功能[D];南京師范大學(xué);2002年

，

本文編號：1945105