發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-04-20 08:34

  本文選題：高校 + 教育管理糾紛　； 參考：《東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：高校教育管理糾紛,是高校教育管理發(fā)展過(guò)程中,逐漸呈現(xiàn)出來(lái)的問(wèn)題。伴隨著高校規(guī)模的擴(kuò)大與大學(xué)教育的普及,有關(guān)高校教育管理糾紛問(wèn)題也日益增多。隨著教育的不斷深化和社會(huì)對(duì)教育領(lǐng)域的不斷重視,高校教育管理糾紛的解決已經(jīng)成為了社會(huì)各界廣泛研討的熱點(diǎn)問(wèn)題。而在不斷的理論基礎(chǔ)挖掘與實(shí)踐活動(dòng)驗(yàn)證中,通過(guò)ADR模式來(lái)解決不斷出現(xiàn)的高校教育管理糾紛問(wèn)題,也已逐漸成為大家所認(rèn)同的解決問(wèn)題的方式。 由于高校在社會(huì)中相對(duì)特殊的獨(dú)特地位,使得其出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題很難通過(guò)簡(jiǎn)單的司法審查來(lái)得到妥善的處理,其中包含的法律關(guān)系,不只是民法范疇,還有行政范疇。因此,單純的通過(guò)訴訟來(lái)界定責(zé)任,解決問(wèn)題常常難以奏效。但是隨著問(wèn)題的不斷增加和擴(kuò)大,如何在當(dāng)下解決好這一高校發(fā)展過(guò)程中存在的重要問(wèn)題,已經(jīng)是迫在眉睫。究其根源,是因?yàn)楝F(xiàn)有的司法審查制度過(guò)于繁雜且不夠完善,不能很好地解決新時(shí)代背景下出現(xiàn)的問(wèn)題與糾紛。同時(shí)由于行政的干預(yù)和法律地位的不確定,也使得現(xiàn)今高校教育管理糾紛解決出現(xiàn)了種種困境。而ADR模式的出現(xiàn),為合理解決高校教育管理糾紛,開(kāi)辟了一條全新的道路。 ADR,即替代性糾紛解決方式(Alternative Dispute Resolution),是指不經(jīng)過(guò)司法裁判,而由中立的第三方來(lái)參與解決糾紛的方式。相比于訴訟制度的程序繁瑣,花費(fèi)高昂,ADR模式在程序上更加簡(jiǎn)約靈活,花費(fèi)的人力物力也相對(duì)訴訟制度要減少很多,對(duì)目前司法審判中的“訴訟爆炸”現(xiàn)象有著很好的緩解與分流作用。同時(shí),相對(duì)于一般糾紛訴訟,高校的糾紛訴訟以其具有的獨(dú)特性,復(fù)雜性,令受案范圍變得難以界定,同時(shí)訴訟的時(shí)間與步驟都相應(yīng)變得冗長(zhǎng)。而用ADR模式來(lái)解決高校糾紛問(wèn)題,卻顯得更加的游刃有余。ADR靈活的方式,獨(dú)有的特性和優(yōu)勢(shì),定會(huì)令其在解決高校管理教育糾紛中,占據(jù)很重要的位置。 ADR的概念,雖然是近現(xiàn)代才提出的一個(gè)全新概念,但是這種解決糾紛的思想,古已有之。中國(guó)早在春秋時(shí)期,就有“不訴”的思想流傳。而從古至今,中國(guó)人的觀念仍然是“多一事不如少一事”,“縣官不如現(xiàn)管”這樣的不訴理念。而到了近現(xiàn)代,這種理念,已經(jīng)轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榱艘环N全新的理念,是對(duì)國(guó)家權(quán)力與公民權(quán)利的一種重新的詮釋,更是對(duì)司法行為的補(bǔ)充與完善。各種不同形式的ADR模式,對(duì)于各個(gè)領(lǐng)域的司法活動(dòng),都是一個(gè)極其有力的助手。 通過(guò)ADR模式的多種渠道,衍生了許多解決高校教育管理糾紛的方式方法。例如協(xié)商機(jī)制、調(diào)解機(jī)制、仲裁機(jī)制、申訴機(jī)制等。這些非訴訟的方式,不僅在時(shí)間上更簡(jiǎn)便,花費(fèi)上更簡(jiǎn)約,處理問(wèn)題也是更加的高效快捷。比起動(dòng)輒一年半載甚至更長(zhǎng)時(shí)間的馬拉松式的訴訟程序,越來(lái)越多地受到社會(huì)廣泛的關(guān)注與青睞。 全文內(nèi)容由以下幾個(gè)部分組成： 開(kāi)篇是文章的引言,簡(jiǎn)要地闡述了本文的研究背景與現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,文章結(jié)構(gòu)和框架。 第一章對(duì)當(dāng)今高校的教育管理糾紛進(jìn)行了界定,對(duì)糾紛的性質(zhì)進(jìn)行了分析,區(qū)分了高校糾紛的類(lèi)別,為梳理弄清高校教育管理糾紛,奠定了理論基礎(chǔ)。 第二章分析了高校教育管理糾紛解決的困境及其內(nèi)在原因,突出探究了現(xiàn)實(shí)困境的嚴(yán)重程度,以及其中蘊(yùn)含的深刻原因,提出了現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題。這些是尋找解決方式的重要基礎(chǔ)。 第三章重點(diǎn)介紹了ADR模式的理論與實(shí)踐基礎(chǔ)。描述了ADR模式在解決高校教育管理糾紛的可行性與適用性,并且與國(guó)外的理論相比較對(duì)照,找出適合我國(guó)高校教育管理糾紛的ADR解決途徑,從而更好的解決高校教育管理糾紛問(wèn)題。 第四章提出了高校教育管理糾紛的ADR解決的具體途徑。包括ADR的各種解決原則,具體措施。最終通過(guò)此種途徑,可以更快、更好地解決高校教育管理糾紛的種種問(wèn)題。 最后是文章的結(jié)語(yǔ)部分,對(duì)全文進(jìn)行了簡(jiǎn)要的總結(jié)并給出了相關(guān)的結(jié)論。
[Abstract]:With the expansion of university scale and the popularization of university education, the problem of disputes in the management of higher education is increasing. With the deepening of education and the constant attention of the society to the field of education, the settlement of disputes in the management of higher education. It has become a hot topic in all circles of society, and in the continuous verification of theoretical foundation mining and practical activities, it has gradually become the way to solve the problem by ADR mode to solve the problems of college education management disputes.
Because of the special special status of the University in the society, it makes it difficult to solve the problem by simple judicial review. The legal relationship contains not only the civil law category, but also the administrative category. Therefore, it is often difficult to solve the problem through the purely litigation. But it is difficult to solve the problem. But with the problem, it is difficult to solve the problem. Increasing and expanding, how to solve the important problems in the process of the development of the university is imminent. The reason is that the existing judicial review system is too complex and imperfect, and can not solve the problems and disputes in the new era. At the same time, because of administrative intervention and law, it is difficult to solve the problems and disputes in the new era. The uncertainty of the position has also made various difficulties in solving the disputes in the education management in Colleges and universities. The emergence of the ADR model has opened up a new road for the rational solution of the disputes in the management of higher education.
ADR, the alternative dispute resolution (Alternative Dispute Resolution) means the way to settle disputes by neutral third parties without judicial refereeing. It is more complicated and expensive than the procedure of the litigation system. The ADR model is more simple and flexible in the program, and the cost of manpower and material resources is also a lot less than the litigation system. At present, the phenomenon of "litigation explosion" in judicial trial has a very good relief and diversion. At the same time, relative to the general dispute litigation, the dispute litigation in Colleges and universities is unique and complex, which makes the scope of the case difficult to define. At the same time, the time and steps of the litigation have become lengthy. And the ADR mode is used to solve the University correction. A lot of problems, but a more flexible way of.ADR, unique characteristics and advantages, will make it occupy a very important position in solving the dispute of university management and education.
Although the concept of ADR is a new concept in modern times, the idea of settling disputes has been established in ancient times. As early as the spring and Autumn period, the idea of "no prosecution" was circulated in the spring and Autumn period. From ancient times to the present, the idea of the Chinese people is still "less than one thing and less one thing" and "county officials are not as good as now". In modern times, this concept has been transformed into a new concept, a reinterpretation of state power and civil rights, and a supplement and improvement of judicial behavior. The various forms of ADR model are a very powerful assistant to judicial activities in various fields.
Through various channels of the ADR model, many ways and means to solve the disputes of educational management in Colleges and universities are derived. Such as negotiation mechanism, mediation mechanism, arbitration mechanism, complaint mechanism, etc. these non litigation methods are not only more convenient in time, more concise, and more efficient and faster in handling problems. The long marathon procedure has been widely concerned and favored by the society.
The full text is composed of the following parts:
The opening part is the introduction of the article, and briefly describes the research background and practical significance of this article, the structure and framework of the article.
The first chapter defines the disputes of education management in Colleges and universities, analyzes the nature of the disputes, distinguishes the categories of the disputes in Colleges and universities, and lays a theoretical foundation for combing and clearing up the disputes of educational management in Colleges and universities.
The second chapter analyzes the difficulties and internal causes of the dispute settlement of the university education management, and explores the seriousness of the realistic predicament, and the profound reasons in it, and puts forward the practical problems. These are the important bases for finding the solution.
The third chapter mainly introduces the theoretical and practical basis of ADR model, describes the feasibility and applicability of ADR mode in solving the dispute of educational management in Colleges and universities, and compares it with foreign theories, and finds out the ADR solution suitable for the dispute of educational management in our universities and colleges, so as to better solve the problem of the dispute of educational management in Colleges and universities.
The fourth chapter puts forward the specific ways to solve the dispute of educational management in Colleges and universities, including the solving principles of ADR, and the concrete measures. Finally, through this way, we can solve all kinds of problems of higher education management disputes faster and better through this way.
The last part is the conclusion of the article, which summarizes the whole article and gives the relevant conclusions.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：G647;D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范愉;淺談當(dāng)代“非訴訟糾紛解決”的發(fā)展及其趨勢(shì)[J];比較法研究;2003年04期

2 羅干;充分發(fā)揮人民調(diào)解作用 創(chuàng)造穩(wěn)定和諧社會(huì)環(huán)境[J];中國(guó)司法;2004年03期

3 劉永紅;王安平;;構(gòu)建多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的法律思考[J];西華師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

4 范愉;以多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制 保證社會(huì)的可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];法律適用;2005年02期

5 王錫鋅;規(guī)則、合意與治理——行政過(guò)程中ADR適用的可能性與妥當(dāng)性研究[J];法商研究;2003年05期

6 齊樹(shù)潔;;關(guān)于我國(guó)民事司法改革的思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

7 袁泉,郭玉軍;ADR——西方盛行的解決民商事?tīng)?zhēng)議的熱門(mén)制度[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年01期

8 范愉;;非訴訟糾紛解決機(jī)制(ADR)與法治的可持續(xù)發(fā)展——糾紛解決與ADR研究的方法與理念[J];法制現(xiàn)代化研究;2004年00期

9 李章軍;替代性糾紛解決程序之研究[J];河北法學(xué);2004年12期

10 譚曉玉;;權(quán)力與權(quán)利的沖突與平衡[J];中國(guó)教育法制評(píng)論;2006年00期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李從浩;中國(guó)大學(xué)行政權(quán)力的合法性研究[D];華中科技大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號(hào)：1777041