本文選題：基層人民法庭　切入點(diǎn)：糾紛解決　出處：《華中師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：基層人民法庭是我國(guó)司法救濟(jì)的“最前線”,為什么它的糾紛解決機(jī)制讓人有研究思考的興趣?一是,基層人民法院的基層人民法庭在司法實(shí)踐中解決糾紛的“獨(dú)特性”、“靈活性”以及“習(xí)慣性”讓人印象深刻；二是,司法理論(這里指國(guó)家頒布的法律正條所指示的直接內(nèi)容)中規(guī)定性的辦案方式、方法與現(xiàn)實(shí)狀態(tài)下的基層法官的具體辦案的“不同性”讓人印象深刻；三是,基層司法糾紛解決之后,民眾對(duì)糾紛本身所引發(fā)的規(guī)則理解的“差異性”讓人印象深刻。本文以制度分析為框架、以行動(dòng)研究和心理活動(dòng)為方法,對(duì)當(dāng)代中國(guó)基層司法糾紛解決的現(xiàn)狀、制度以及法官和民眾對(duì)糾紛解決所產(chǎn)生的反作用影響,分別從糾紛解決的一般理論框架、糾紛解決的運(yùn)行軌跡、糾紛解決的司法功能、糾紛解決的矛盾反思四個(gè)方面展開論述,最后對(duì)現(xiàn)行的基層人民法庭糾紛解決機(jī)制為我國(guó)法治事業(yè)的貢獻(xiàn)上,提出了一些讓人思考的改革性問題。 引言對(duì)研究問題和研究背景作了簡(jiǎn)要的交代,并引入制度分析的理論框架和行動(dòng)研究方法。 文章的第一部分主要從糾紛解決本身的路徑里去把握糾紛解決的一般性理論基礎(chǔ),從糾紛解決本原和本性出發(fā),分析和歸納了糾紛解決機(jī)制的一般類型和模式。 文章的第二部分以法律實(shí)務(wù)中具體的某某人民法庭為參照系,客觀詳細(xì)的描述了一個(gè)基層人民法庭運(yùn)行的全部軌跡。 文章的第三部分主要從司法的功能著手,在說明為什么當(dāng)下國(guó)家把基層司法的“社會(huì)效果“放在首位的同時(shí)也反思了一部分長(zhǎng)期以來讓法學(xué)界(特別是研究基層司法領(lǐng)域的學(xué)界)擔(dān)心的問題。 文章的第四部分在反思基層司法糾紛解決功能性基礎(chǔ)之上,又以在基層司法裁判過程中的一個(gè)實(shí)例反映出制定法與基層社會(huì)習(xí)慣的不相融性來進(jìn)一步的探討民事習(xí)慣在司法糾紛解決過程中所起到的微妙作用。另外,還提出了一個(gè)比較引人關(guān)注的問題即在當(dāng)下中國(guó)基層司法實(shí)踐中法治的精神理念(具體指國(guó)家立法者在制定法中所表現(xiàn)出來的理念)應(yīng)該如何貫穿在民眾的心中,讓其根深蒂固,茁壯成長(zhǎng)。
[Abstract]:The grass-roots people's court is the "front line" of our country's judicial relief, why does its dispute resolution mechanism make people have the interest of studying and thinking? First, the "uniqueness", "flexibility" and "habituation" of the grass-roots people's courts in resolving disputes in judicial practice are impressive; second, The method of handling cases specified in the judicial theory (in this case refers to the direct content indicated by the right article of the law promulgated by the state) is impressive from the "different" nature of the specific handling of cases by grass-roots judges in a realistic state; third, After the settlement of judicial disputes at the grass-roots level, the "difference" of the people's understanding of the rules caused by the dispute itself is impressive. This paper takes institutional analysis as the framework, action research and psychological activities as the methods. From the general theoretical framework of dispute resolution, the running track of dispute resolution, the judicial function of dispute resolution, the author analyzes the current situation, system and reaction of judges and the public to dispute settlement in contemporary China, respectively, from the general theoretical framework of dispute resolution, the operational track of dispute resolution, and the judicial function of dispute resolution. This paper discusses the contradictions of dispute resolution in four aspects, and at last puts forward some reform problems on the contribution of the current dispute resolution mechanism of the people's courts at the grass-roots level to the cause of rule of law in our country. The introduction gives a brief account of the research problems and research background, and introduces the theoretical framework and action research methods of institutional analysis. The first part of the article mainly from the path of dispute resolution to grasp the general theoretical basis of dispute resolution, from the origin and nature of dispute resolution, analyzed and summarized the general types and models of dispute resolution mechanism. The second part of the article takes the specific court of the people in the legal practice as the reference frame, and describes in detail all the tracks of the operation of a basic people's court in an objective and detailed way. The third part of the article mainly starts from the function of judicature. While explaining why the country puts the "social effect" of grass-roots justice in the first place at present, it also reflects on some problems that have long worried the legal circles (especially those who study the field of grass-roots justice). The fourth part of the article reflects on the functional basis of judicial dispute resolution at the grass-roots level. Another example in the process of judicial adjudication at the grass-roots level reflects the incompatibility between the formulation law and the social habits at the grass-roots level to further explore the subtle role that civil custom plays in the process of resolving judicial disputes. It also raises the question of how the spiritual concept of the rule of law (specifically the idea expressed by the national legislator in the formulation law) should run through the minds of the public in the current practice of grass-roots justice in China. Let it be ingrained and thrive.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊瑞;;論人民法庭法官的角色偏離及其正當(dāng)性[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2007年01期

2 張永紅;;英國(guó)的基層法院、法官及司法管理 利物浦郡法院見聞[J];法律適用;2009年01期

3 章武生;基層法院改革若干問題研究[J];法商研究;2002年06期

4 胡夏冰;陳春梅;;我國(guó)人民法庭制度的發(fā)展歷程[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年02期

5 陳巍;;新農(nóng)村建設(shè)與基層司法改革[J];法學(xué)家;2007年01期

6 夏群佩;;在規(guī)范與非規(guī)范之間尋找平衡——人民法庭職權(quán)優(yōu)化之進(jìn)路[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年01期

7 張睿;;論和諧社會(huì)理念下人民法庭的弱司法化[J];河北法學(xué);2009年05期

8 丁衛(wèi);;基層法官如何回應(yīng)農(nóng)村司法——以秦鎮(zhèn)法庭為例[J];江西師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年01期

9 高其才;周偉平;姜振業(yè);;人民法庭的鄉(xiāng)土司法特性[J];昆明理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年01期

10 陳翠玉;;回顧與反思:建國(guó)初期的土地改革人民法庭——兼談對(duì)當(dāng)下司法建設(shè)的啟示意義[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2010年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳琦華;回應(yīng)性法理念與法院立案庭制度創(chuàng)新研究[D];上海大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 戴鴻峰;我國(guó)人民法庭司法運(yùn)作方式存在的問題與完善[D];蘇州大學(xué);2010年

2 邢毅;論農(nóng)村人民法庭[D];四川大學(xué);2004年

3 王宗冉;當(dāng)前我國(guó)基層法院巡回審判制度研究[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

4 馬璐巍;人民法庭制度辨析[D];青島大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1668201