發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-26 09:06

  本文選題：司法　切入點(diǎn)：能動(dòng)　出處：《陜西師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：2009年8月,最高人民法院院長、首席大法官王勝俊同志就當(dāng)前人民法院應(yīng)如何更好地服務(wù)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)發(fā)展需要、更好地發(fā)揮司法的職能和作用等問題到江蘇等地進(jìn)行調(diào)研時(shí),提出能動(dòng)司法這一概念,期望人民法院能對(duì)當(dāng)前轉(zhuǎn)型變革情形下復(fù)雜多變的社會(huì)狀況作出積極回應(yīng)。此后,各級(jí)法院將能動(dòng)司法作為司法實(shí)踐的重要指導(dǎo),積極探索嘗試能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)現(xiàn)形式。這在一定程度上對(duì)化解社會(huì)矛盾糾紛,切實(shí)保障群眾權(quán)益,維護(hù)社會(huì)公平正義,促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)健康發(fā)展起到了積極作用。同時(shí),法學(xué)理論界也開始關(guān)注最高人民法院關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法的各種指導(dǎo)性意見,積極深入實(shí)踐研究典型,思考和比較中國語境下的能動(dòng)司法與西方司法能動(dòng)主義的關(guān)聯(lián)性,形成豐富而具有實(shí)踐指導(dǎo)意義的科研成果。 目前,司法實(shí)務(wù)界在尚未充分明確和理解能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵情況下,已開始根據(jù)當(dāng)?shù)貙?shí)際情況探索能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)現(xiàn)路徑,為大家所熟知的模式有：姜堰模式、隴縣模式、東營模式、河南模式等；法學(xué)理論界的探討研究則多集中在能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)現(xiàn)條件和路徑、注意事項(xiàng)、能動(dòng)司法與西方司法能動(dòng)的比較、能動(dòng)司法與司法克制的關(guān)系等等。有的學(xué)者對(duì)能動(dòng)司法持積極態(tài)度；有的學(xué)者對(duì)能動(dòng)司法表示極力反對(duì)；亦有學(xué)者對(duì)能動(dòng)司法持溫和態(tài)度,既在某種程度上表示肯定,又對(duì)實(shí)踐中存在的部分觀點(diǎn)和模式有所擔(dān)憂。學(xué)者對(duì)能動(dòng)司法如此種種不同態(tài)度,在某種程度上源自對(duì)能動(dòng)司法內(nèi)涵認(rèn)識(shí)的不足和不統(tǒng)一。已有的研究成果少有深入探究能動(dòng)司法基于當(dāng)前中國司法環(huán)境所具有的內(nèi)涵,因此,明確能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵,既是統(tǒng)一并規(guī)范司法實(shí)務(wù)界和法學(xué)理論界認(rèn)識(shí)的根本,又是能動(dòng)司法實(shí)踐積極探索的理論依據(jù),也是進(jìn)一步深入研究能動(dòng)司法的理論基礎(chǔ)。 以探究能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵為核心,本文主要分四部分展開論述。 第一部分是文章的第一章。這一部分主要對(duì)與能動(dòng)司法相關(guān)的概念范圍進(jìn)行界定。首先,對(duì)“司法”的概念進(jìn)行歷史性回顧,明確本文中談到的司法的涵義,司法的主體是人民法院；其次,對(duì)“能動(dòng)”的概念進(jìn)行界定；最后,在不考慮能動(dòng)司法和司法能動(dòng)特定的內(nèi)涵和實(shí)踐的情況下,對(duì)“司法”與“能動(dòng)”的詞語組合搭配,即：“能動(dòng)司法”與“司法能動(dòng)”進(jìn)行語義分析,考察兩者的語義相關(guān)性。 第二部分是文章的第二章。這一部分首先對(duì)美國的司法能動(dòng)的基本內(nèi)涵進(jìn)行界定,明確司法能動(dòng)是以司法審查和憲法的關(guān)系為中心而展開；在此基礎(chǔ)上,以司法審查為線索,運(yùn)用歷史的方法回顧美國司法能動(dòng)的產(chǎn)生、發(fā)展過程,并將司法能動(dòng)的發(fā)展分為三個(gè)階段論述；其次,對(duì)美國司法能動(dòng)的歷史進(jìn)行分析,以期明確美國司法能動(dòng)所具有的特征；最后,論述美國司法能動(dòng)對(duì)于我國能動(dòng)司法的啟示。 第三部分是文章的第三章和第四章。首先從我國的基本國情、金融危機(jī)的影響、轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期、法制現(xiàn)狀、司法現(xiàn)狀五個(gè)方面對(duì)我國復(fù)雜的司法環(huán)境進(jìn)行分析,進(jìn)而推導(dǎo)出社會(huì)對(duì)司法的期待,說明能動(dòng)司法的必要性；根據(jù)我國現(xiàn)有的法律法規(guī)分析我國人民法院在國家權(quán)力架構(gòu)中的權(quán)力分配和地位。其次,根據(jù)中國能動(dòng)司法所處的環(huán)境,并在評(píng)析司法實(shí)務(wù)界和法學(xué)理論界對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的不同認(rèn)識(shí)的基礎(chǔ)上,明確能動(dòng)司法的中國內(nèi)涵具有兩個(gè)方面的意義,即作為一種司法政策的能動(dòng)司法和作為一種司法裁判方法的能動(dòng)司法；最后,依據(jù)能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵理論推導(dǎo)出當(dāng)前能動(dòng)司法的實(shí)踐內(nèi)涵。 第四部分是文章的第五章,也是文章的結(jié)論部分�？偨Y(jié)全文,并再次強(qiáng)調(diào)能動(dòng)司法內(nèi)涵明確的意義,期待著研究者的爭(zhēng)議能夠明晰中國司法改革的路徑。
[Abstract]:In August 2009, the president of the Supreme People's court, the chief justice of Comrade Wang Shengjun of the people's court should be how to better serve the needs of economic and social development, better play the function and role of judicial problems to Jiangsu for research, put forward the concept of judicial activism, the people's court can expect on the current reform situation complex the social status of positive response. Since then, the courts take judicial activism as judicial practice guidance, and actively explore the implementation form of judicial activism. This to a certain extent to resolve social conflicts and disputes, safeguard the rights and interests of the people, safeguard social fairness and justice, promote the healthy development of the economy and society has played a positive role. At the same time, the law the theory also began to pay attention to the Supreme People's Court on judicial activism of guidance, positive development practice on typical thinking, and Comparing the relationship between the active judicature and the western judicial activism in the Chinese context, the scientific research achievements with practical guiding significance are formed.
At present, in the judicial practice is not yet fully clear and understanding the connotation of judicial activism case, has begun to explore the path to achieve according to the actual situation of the local judicial activism, well known model are: Jiangyan mode, Longxian mode, Dongying mode, Henan mode; research on theory of law is more focused on implementation the condition and path of judicial activism, attention, comparison of judicial activism and the western judicial activism, the relationship between judicial activism and judicial restraint and so on. Some scholars hold a positive attitude towards judicial activism; some scholars said strongly opposed of activejudicial; some scholars hold moderate attitude to judicial activism, not only to a certain extent affirmed and, on the part of ideas and models in practice concerns. Scholars of judicial activism in such a variety of different attitudes, from the understanding of the connotation of judicial activism in some extent Insufficient and not unified. The existing research results are less in-depth study of judicial activism in current judicial environment China has based on the connotation, therefore, clear the connotation of the judicial activism, the fundamental is to unify and standardize the judicial practice and legal theory knowledge, is the theoretical basis of judicial activism and actively explore the practice, but also the theoretical basis for further in-depth study of the judicial activism.
In order to explore the connotation of active justice as the core, this article is mainly divided into four parts.
The first part is the first chapter of the article. This part of the main range of the related concepts about judicial activism was defined. First, to review the history of the concept of justice ", this paper talked about judicial meaning, the judicial body is the people's court; secondly, the concept of" energy "; finally, without considering the judicial activism and judicial activism specific connotation and practice under the condition of" justice "and" active "word combination collocation, namely:" Judicial Activism "and" Judicial Activism "semantic analysis, semantic relevance between them.
The second part is the second chapter. This part firstly the basic connotation of judicial activism in the United States are clearly defined, judicial activism is the relationship between judicial review and the constitution centered; on this basis, the judicial review as a clue, using the method of history review of American judicial activism, and development process. The development of judicial activism is divided into three chapters; secondly, on the history of American judicial activism is analyzed, with the characteristics of clear American judicial activism has; finally, discusses the judicial activism for China's judicial activism of the enlightenment.
The third part is the third chapter and the fourth chapter. First, from the basic situation of our country, the influence of the financial crisis, the transition period, legal status, analysis of China's complex judicial environment five aspects of judicial status, and then derive the social expectations of the judiciary and the necessity to move according to my justice; existing laws and regulations, analysis of China's people's court in the national power structure and the distribution of power and status. Secondly, according to the Chinese of judicial activism in the environment, and in the judicial practice and legal theory of judicial activism in different understanding on the basis of clear judicial activism has two aspects of the connotation of China meaning, as a judicial policy of judicial activism and judicial adjudication as a method of judicial activism; finally, according to the connotation of judicial activism is derived from the theory of the current practice of judicial activism in the culvert.
The fourth part is the fifth chapter of the article, and also the conclusion of the article. Summarize the full text, and emphasize the significance of the connotation of active justice again, and look forward to the controversy of researchers to clarify the path of China's judicial reform.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：陜西師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926
，

本文編號(hào)：1667236