本文選題：法官懲戒制度　切入點(diǎn)：懲戒程序　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的逐步推進(jìn),人們的法律意識(shí)不斷增強(qiáng),對(duì)于法官違法違紀(jì)行為的懲處也日益為公眾所關(guān)注。完善法官懲戒制度是推進(jìn)我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的一個(gè)重要環(huán)節(jié),能有助于維護(hù)司法獨(dú)立,遏制司法腐敗的發(fā)生,并且能規(guī)范法官的行為,從而促使法官依法高效率裁判案件。鑒于法官懲戒制度的重要性,有必要對(duì)其進(jìn)行深入的理論研究。現(xiàn)行的法律法規(guī)以及最高人民法院的司法文件對(duì)此作了一些零散的規(guī)定,但其中還有很多不成熟、不完善之處,需要對(duì)其加以改革和完善。文章立足中國(guó)國(guó)情,運(yùn)用比較研究的方法,在借鑒國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)的基礎(chǔ)上對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行法官懲戒制度進(jìn)行分析,以期為我國(guó)法官懲戒制度的完善獻(xiàn)出一分薄力。本文分為四個(gè)部分： 第一部分：開篇提出了法官懲戒制度的概念以及法官懲戒制度存在的理論基礎(chǔ)并闡明建立和完善法官懲戒制度的必要性。 第二部分：介紹英美法系和大陸法系主要代表國(guó)家在法官懲戒制度方面的先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)并且對(duì)其存在的特點(diǎn)進(jìn)行總結(jié)評(píng)述,為我國(guó)學(xué)習(xí)和借鑒國(guó)外的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行了理論上的準(zhǔn)備。 第三部分：比較分析我國(guó)法官懲戒制度的現(xiàn)狀,提出我國(guó)法官懲戒制度在立法方面以及司法實(shí)踐方面存在的主要問題。 第四部分：針對(duì)第三部分發(fā)掘的問題,結(jié)合國(guó)外先進(jìn)立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)和我國(guó)具體國(guó)情提出完善的措施。提出建立和完善專門的法官懲戒機(jī)構(gòu)；細(xì)化懲戒程序,使此程序切實(shí)可行；限定懲戒事由,使之明細(xì)化、規(guī)范化；改革懲戒措施,使得懲戒措施能體現(xiàn)法官的職業(yè)特點(diǎn)等一些建議。 在法官懲戒制度構(gòu)建上,文章或許存在一點(diǎn)創(chuàng)新,但由于理論積累的不足和實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的匱乏,本論文研究仍存在諸多的不足,這些不足和缺憾希望能在今后對(duì)法官懲戒制度的進(jìn)一步研究之中得到彌補(bǔ)。
[Abstract]:With the gradual development of the rule of law in our country, people's legal consciousness is constantly strengthened, and the punishment of the judge's illegal and disciplinary behavior is paid more and more attention by the public. Perfecting the judge's disciplinary system is an important link to promote the construction of our country's rule of law. It can help to preserve the independence of the judiciary, curb the occurrence of judicial corruption, and regulate the conduct of judges, thereby encouraging judges to adjudicate cases efficiently according to law. Given the importance of the disciplinary system of judges, It is necessary to make a deep theoretical study of it. The current laws and regulations and the judicial documents of the Supreme people's Court have made some scattered provisions on this, but there are still many immaturity and imperfections among them. It needs to be reformed and perfected. Based on the situation of China, the article analyzes the current system of the punishment of judges in China on the basis of drawing lessons from the advanced legislative experience of foreign countries and using the method of comparative study. This paper is divided into four parts:. In the first part, the author puts forward the concept of judge's disciplinary system and the theoretical basis of judge's disciplinary system and expounds the necessity of establishing and perfecting judge's disciplinary system. The second part: introduce the advanced legislative experience of common law system and civil law system, and summarize the characteristics of their existence. For our country to learn and learn from the advanced experience of foreign countries for theoretical preparation. The third part: compares and analyzes the present situation of our country's judge disciplinary system, and puts forward the main problems of our country's judge disciplinary system in the aspect of legislation and judicial practice. The fourth part: in view of the third part excavates the question, unifies the foreign advanced legislation experience and our country concrete national condition puts forward the consummation measure, proposes the establishment and the consummation specialized judge discipline institution, refines the discipline procedure, makes this procedure feasible; Some suggestions are put forward, such as limiting the cause of disciplinary punishment, making it more detailed and standardized, and reforming disciplinary measures so as to reflect the professional characteristics of judges. In the construction of judge disciplinary system, there may be a little innovation in this paper, but due to the lack of theoretical accumulation and practical experience, there are still many deficiencies in this paper. It is hoped that these deficiencies can be remedied in the further study of the system of judges' punishment in the future.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 郭建安;論美國(guó)的司法體制[J];中國(guó)司法;2004年01期

2 蔣惠嶺;論法官懲戒程序之司法性[J];法律適用;2003年09期

3 于秀艷;論我國(guó)法官懲戒程序及其改革[J];法律適用;2003年09期

4 俞甲乙;美國(guó)聯(lián)邦及各州司法懲戒制度[J];法律適用;2003年09期

5 嚴(yán)仁群;美國(guó)憲法下的法官?gòu)椲琅c司法懲戒[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年06期

6 嚴(yán)仁群;美國(guó)法官懲戒制度論要——兼析中美懲戒理念之差異[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年06期

7 王晨光;法律運(yùn)行中的不確定性與“錯(cuò)案追究制”的誤區(qū)[J];法學(xué);1997年03期

8 何秉群,周樨平;關(guān)于健全我國(guó)法官懲戒制度的思考[J];廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

9 徐靜村;潘金貴;;法官懲戒制度研究——兼論我國(guó)司法彈劾制度的建構(gòu)[J];公法研究;2004年00期

10 甄樹青;法官懲戒制度與遏制法官腐敗[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王巖華;論法官責(zé)任制[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

2 曹麗;從錯(cuò)案追究談我國(guó)法官懲戒制度的改革[D];西南政法大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：1666304