本文選題：論辯　切入點(diǎn)：批判性討論　出處：《甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué)》2017年01期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：批判與質(zhì)疑在消除爭(zhēng)議方面起著關(guān)鍵性作用,法庭論辯作為一種動(dòng)態(tài)性、交互性的爭(zhēng)議解決機(jī)制,應(yīng)被置于批判性討論框架之中予以審視、檢省。批判性問題評(píng)估法作為與批判性討論相匹配的評(píng)估機(jī)制,注重辯證評(píng)估整個(gè)論證的過程,并在該過程中識(shí)別出論證效力的例外情形予以排除或反駁,以達(dá)到加固或削弱論證的目的。在法庭論辯語境中,審判方、起訴方、應(yīng)訴方在遵循實(shí)體和程序規(guī)則的前提下,圍繞法律規(guī)范的不完備性與案件事實(shí)的不確定性提出批判性問題,在批判與回應(yīng)的對(duì)話剖面中檢驗(yàn)各種訴訟主張,逐一排除合理性懷疑,最終實(shí)現(xiàn)論證結(jié)論的可接受性。
[Abstract]:Criticism and doubt play a key role in resolving disputes. As a kind of dynamic and interactive dispute resolution mechanism, court debate should be examined in the framework of critical discussion. As an evaluation mechanism matching with the critical discussion, the critical problem evaluation method pays attention to the process of dialectical evaluation of the whole argumentation, and in this process, the exception of identifying the validity of the argumentation is excluded or refuted. In order to reinforce or weaken the argument. In the context of a court argument, the judge, the prosecution, and the respondent follow the rules of substance and procedure, Based on the imperfections of the legal norms and the uncertainty of the facts of the case, this paper puts forward critical questions, tests all kinds of litigation claims in the dialogue section of criticism and response, removes the doubt of rationality one by one, and finally realizes the acceptability of the argumentation conclusion.
【作者單位】： 南昌理工學(xué)院法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國(guó)家社科基金重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目“法律論證邏輯研究”(15AZX019)
【分類號(hào)】：D916.2
，

本文編號(hào)：1634385