錯(cuò)案責(zé)任追究的是致錯(cuò)的故意或重大過(guò)失行為——再論錯(cuò)案責(zé)任
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-03-19 12:51
本文選題:錯(cuò)案責(zé)任 切入點(diǎn):重大過(guò)錯(cuò) 出處:《人民檢察》2015年21期 論文類(lèi)型:期刊論文
【摘要】:錯(cuò)案責(zé)任從古代不問(wèn)主觀心態(tài)的結(jié)果責(zé)任,到現(xiàn)代的過(guò)錯(cuò)責(zé)任,體現(xiàn)了人類(lèi)對(duì)司法規(guī)律認(rèn)識(shí)的深化和司法的文明進(jìn)步。由司法工作的特殊性和司法規(guī)律所決定,司法不能單憑錯(cuò)案追責(zé),但對(duì)故意或者重大過(guò)失造成錯(cuò)案的則應(yīng)予追責(zé),因?yàn)樗w現(xiàn)了主觀過(guò)錯(cuò)、客觀行為與危害結(jié)果(錯(cuò)案)的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:The responsibility of wrong cases from the result responsibility of not asking the subjective mentality in ancient times to the modern fault liability embodies the deepening of human understanding of the judicial law and the progress of the judicial civilization, which is determined by the particularity of judicial work and the judicial law. The judicature can not only rely on the wrong case to pursue the responsibility, but the wrong case caused by the intentional or gross negligence should be pursued, because it embodies the subjective fault, the organic unity of the objective behavior and the harmful result (wrong case).
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D926
,
本文編號(hào):1634353
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/gongjianfalunwen/1634353.html
最近更新
教材專(zhuān)著