發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-03-08 21:26

  本文選題：民事審判權(quán)　切入點(diǎn)：民事檢察權(quán)　出處：《西北師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度存在的目的是通過檢察權(quán)對(duì)審判權(quán)的督促，維護(hù)司法的公正和效率，以實(shí)現(xiàn)司法程序的合理運(yùn)行并維護(hù)法律的權(quán)威。民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督以抗訴再審為主體，由于抗訴再審程序設(shè)計(jì)在實(shí)際運(yùn)行中存在很多問題和不足，檢察院的民事抗訴權(quán)僅僅是再審程序啟動(dòng)權(quán)，缺乏獨(dú)立的審理程序，檢察監(jiān)督程序的非獨(dú)立性及現(xiàn)有監(jiān)督制度本身的缺陷削弱了檢察監(jiān)督的實(shí)效性。為此，加強(qiáng)民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督問題的理論研究，構(gòu)建獨(dú)立的民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度具有迫切的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。本文從這個(gè)角度出發(fā)，通過對(duì)現(xiàn)行民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度的分析，找出現(xiàn)有制度的缺陷及造成這些問題的原因，對(duì)比中西方檢察監(jiān)督制度的差異性以及我國自身的特點(diǎn)，對(duì)獨(dú)立民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督程序的設(shè)立問題進(jìn)行了初步探討，內(nèi)容結(jié)構(gòu)主要分為以下幾個(gè)部分： 第一部分，論述了本文的選題背景，研究意義，研究方法及思路。第二部分，以我國民事訴訟法的規(guī)定為出發(fā)點(diǎn)，結(jié)合司法實(shí)踐中出現(xiàn)的問題和爭議，總結(jié)民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度存在的弊端，，并分析出現(xiàn)問題的原因。第三部分，從法理層面分析，構(gòu)建我國獨(dú)立民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督程序的理論。通過對(duì)比中西方檢察監(jiān)督制度發(fā)展的不同點(diǎn)討論權(quán)力監(jiān)督與權(quán)力制約的差別，論證了我國檢察權(quán)的本質(zhì)和存在的問題，并尋求建立獨(dú)立民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督程序的目的和必要性。第四部分，以前三部分論述為基礎(chǔ)，提出構(gòu)建獨(dú)立民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督程序的具體設(shè)想，同時(shí)表明制度的構(gòu)建是一個(gè)復(fù)雜和漫長的過程，需要長期不斷的檢驗(yàn)和實(shí)踐，在實(shí)踐反饋基礎(chǔ)上的不斷改進(jìn)，方能最終達(dá)到完善。
[Abstract]:The purpose of the existence of the procuratorial supervision system in civil litigation is to maintain the justice and efficiency of the judiciary through the supervision of the judicial power by the procuratorial power. In order to realize the reasonable operation of the judicial procedure and maintain the authority of the law, the procuratorial supervision of civil action takes the protest retrial as the main body, because there are many problems and deficiencies in the actual operation of the design of the protest retrial procedure. The procuratorate's right of civil protest is only the right to start the retrial procedure, and the lack of independent trial procedure, the non-independence of the procuratorial supervision procedure and the defects of the existing supervisory system weaken the effectiveness of the procuratorial supervision. It is of urgent practical significance to strengthen the theoretical research on the procuratorial supervision in civil litigation and to construct an independent procuratorial supervision system in civil litigation. From this angle, this paper analyzes the current procuratorial supervision system in civil litigation. To find out the defects of the system and the causes of these problems, comparing the differences of the procuratorial supervision system between China and the West and the characteristics of our own, this paper makes a preliminary discussion on the establishment of the procuratorial supervision procedure in independent civil litigation. The content structure is divided into the following parts:. The first part discusses the background, research significance, research methods and ideas of this paper. The second part, with the provisions of our civil procedure law as the starting point, combined with the judicial practice of the problems and disputes, This paper summarizes the drawbacks of the procuratorial supervision system in civil litigation, and analyzes the causes of the problems. By comparing the differences between the development of procuratorial supervision system between China and the West, the paper discusses the differences between power supervision and power restriction, and demonstrates the essence and existing problems of procuratorial power in China. The purpose and necessity of establishing the independent civil procedure of procuratorial supervision are also sought. Part 4th, on the basis of the previous three parts, puts forward the concrete idea of constructing the independent civil procedure of procuratorial supervision. At the same time, it shows that the construction of the system is a complex and long process, which requires long-term continuous testing and practice, and continuous improvement on the basis of practice feedback, in order to achieve the final perfection.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926.34

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蔣德海;;論我國檢察機(jī)關(guān)的雙重國家權(quán)力[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2010年05期

2 蔣德海;;法律監(jiān)督還是訴訟監(jiān)督[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年03期

3 黃松有;檢察監(jiān)督與審判獨(dú)立[J];法學(xué)研究;2000年04期

4 陳衛(wèi)東;我國檢察權(quán)的反思與重構(gòu)——以公訴權(quán)為核心的分析[J];法學(xué)研究;2002年02期

5 袁曙宏;韓春暉;;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)期的法治發(fā)展規(guī)律研究[J];法學(xué)研究;2006年04期

6 黃小雨;;論民事執(zhí)行檢察監(jiān)督的不足與完善[J];理論界;2011年03期

7 潘君;對(duì)民行抗訴辦案規(guī)則的理解與適用[J];人民檢察;2002年01期

8 江偉;略論檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)在民事訴訟中的行使[J];人民檢察;2005年18期

9 張建升;立足憲政體制合理配置民事行政檢察權(quán)——民事行政訴訟中檢察權(quán)配置問題專家研討會(huì)綜述[J];人民檢察;2005年18期

10 徐建波;呂瑞云;;2006年檢察理論研究成果盤點(diǎn)[J];人民檢察;2006年23期

本文編號(hào)：1585636