本文選題：分段集約執(zhí)行　切入點(diǎn)：分權(quán)制衡　出處：《法律適用》2017年11期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：本文從分段集約執(zhí)行機(jī)制基礎(chǔ)的分權(quán)制衡理論與分工增益理論出發(fā),通過(guò)實(shí)證分析指出現(xiàn)行分段集約執(zhí)行模式并未達(dá)到程序設(shè)計(jì)之初提高執(zhí)行工作質(zhì)量與效率的客觀事實(shí),并反思得出其根本原因在于現(xiàn)行模式在程序設(shè)計(jì)上與執(zhí)行實(shí)施固有規(guī)律不符的結(jié)論。基于此,筆者以分權(quán)制衡理論與分工增益理論在執(zhí)行實(shí)施中的重新細(xì)化考量為視角,得出最有效的分權(quán)制衡僅要求將執(zhí)行處置權(quán)予以分離,最有效的分工僅要求將現(xiàn)行模式下依據(jù)不同執(zhí)行階段的"橫向"分工轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)榈徒粨Q成本的"縱向"分工方式的結(jié)論。最后筆者結(jié)合當(dāng)前司法改革的方向,在分別參考國(guó)內(nèi)現(xiàn)有改革經(jīng)驗(yàn)與域外執(zhí)行人員分工的基礎(chǔ)上,提出單設(shè)執(zhí)行處置部門(mén)行使執(zhí)行處置權(quán),將以往執(zhí)行庭內(nèi)部的分段轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)閳?zhí)行局部門(mén)間的分權(quán),將執(zhí)行實(shí)施工作分為判斷性工作與事務(wù)性工作分別由執(zhí)行法官與執(zhí)行輔助人員承擔(dān)的重構(gòu)方法,以期通過(guò)對(duì)執(zhí)行實(shí)施權(quán)的合理配置與執(zhí)行人員的合理分工為法院解決執(zhí)行難問(wèn)題提供一種內(nèi)在的解決思路。
[Abstract]:Based on the theory of separation of powers and gains of division of labor on the basis of piecewise intensive execution mechanism, this paper points out through empirical analysis that the current mode of piecewise intensive execution has not reached the objective fact of improving the quality and efficiency of execution at the beginning of program design. It is concluded that the basic reason lies in the fact that the current mode is not consistent with the inherent law of execution. Based on this, the author takes the theory of separation of powers and the theory of division of labor gain as the angle of view of rethinking in the implementation of the implementation of the separation of powers and checks and balances and the theory of division of labor. Came to the conclusion that the most effective decentralized checks and balances only require the separation of executive powers of disposal, The most effective division of labor only requires the conclusion that the "horizontal" division of labor under the current mode should be transformed into a "vertical" division of labor with low exchange cost according to the different stages of implementation. Finally, the author combines the direction of the current judicial reform. On the basis of reference to the existing domestic reform experience and the division of labour among the overseas practitioners, it is proposed that a separate execution and disposal department be established to exercise the enforcement and disposal authority, and to transform the previous segment within the executive chamber into a division of powers among the executive boards. The reconstruction method that divides the execution work into the judgment work and the transactional work by the executive judge and the executive assistant staff respectively, It is expected that the rational allocation of enforcement power and the rational division of enforcement personnel will provide an internal solution for the court to solve the problem of enforcement difficulties.
【作者單位】： 香港中文大學(xué);天津市第二中級(jí)人民法院民二庭;天津市和平區(qū)人民法院民三庭;
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 葉永祿,顧湯華,林麗;對(duì)建立新執(zhí)行機(jī)制的思考[J];上海交通大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年02期

2 李敏;高志海;;每個(gè)音符都要美——記北京二中院“分段集約執(zhí)行機(jī)制”[J];中國(guó)審判;2009年01期

3 閆淑斌;;能動(dòng)司法理念下執(zhí)行機(jī)制的完善[J];現(xiàn)代商業(yè);2012年26期

4 譚啟彬;;我國(guó)社區(qū)矯正的執(zhí)行機(jī)制研究[J];學(xué)術(shù)探索;2008年01期

5 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者;省高院建立網(wǎng)絡(luò)執(zhí)行機(jī)制[N];法制生活報(bào);2014年

2 吳紹祥;鎮(zhèn)江法院統(tǒng)一執(zhí)行機(jī)制顯聲威[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2000年

3 王恩飛;健全執(zhí)行機(jī)制提高質(zhì)效[N];江蘇經(jīng)濟(jì)報(bào);2008年

4 記者 張建軍邋通訊員 范貞 林曄晗;廣東啟動(dòng)11部門(mén)聯(lián)動(dòng)執(zhí)行機(jī)制[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

5 趙繼釗;“聯(lián)動(dòng)執(zhí)行機(jī)制”顯威惡意拖欠債務(wù)人曝光[N];太原日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

6 記者 周迎飚 通訊員 鄒永梭 鄒 邕;于都法院創(chuàng)新執(zhí)行機(jī)制見(jiàn)成效[N];人民法院報(bào);2003年

7 曾妍;湖南創(chuàng)新執(zhí)行機(jī)制成效顯著[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

8 通訊員 張廷貴;阿瓦提法院試行陽(yáng)光執(zhí)行機(jī)制[N];阿克蘇日?qǐng)?bào);2010年

9 李信華;完善禁止令執(zhí)行機(jī)制之我見(jiàn)[N];江蘇法制報(bào);2012年

10 丁力辛 通訊員 駱新穎;橋東法院建立聯(lián)動(dòng)執(zhí)行機(jī)制[N];人民法院報(bào);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1585375