發(fā)布時間：2018-01-25 02:47

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法正義 錯案 錯案責任 追究制度 比較分析　出處：《內(nèi)蒙古大學》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】：社會各類司法案件的審理,一直以來,法官都發(fā)揮著至著緊要的決策宣判作用,因此,作為司法機關(guān)的執(zhí)法人員,法官能否客觀、公平、公正地審理案件,維護社會的治安秩序以及訴訟人的合法權(quán)益,這將對我國法律的權(quán)威性與政策的公信力,有著同樣重要的影響作用。我國目前的司法審判實踐中,有一部分法官濫用職權(quán),貪贓枉法,徇私舞弊,辦理"關(guān)系案"、"人情案",違反法規(guī)法紀,枉法裁判的腐敗司法現(xiàn)象時有發(fā)生,產(chǎn)生了大量的冤假錯案。有鑒于此,為了維護司法公正,加強對我國法官隊伍的監(jiān)管,完善現(xiàn)有法律法規(guī)對法官責任的追究制度,我國近年制訂并出臺了諸多層面的法官錯案責任追究制度。但就實際情況來看,當前針對錯審、錯判等社會案件,我國仍然沒有較完善的法律追究機制,針對這些問題,現(xiàn)已引起了社會全民、司法界以及學術(shù)界的關(guān)注。所以,筆者試圖從"錯案"概念以及錯案責任追究標準的內(nèi)涵和外延入手,對這一制度進行全面分析,指出現(xiàn)行我國法官錯案責任追究制度的缺點,以及當前社會條件下在我國追究法官錯案責任的可行性。從懲戒制度要系統(tǒng)、錯案概念確定、統(tǒng)一錯案認定標準等不同的方向?qū)Ψü馘e案責任追究制度的不足和完善進行探討,為法官錯案責任追究的制度能夠順利的實施提供參考,以便建立我國法官的錯案責任追究制度體系,進而實現(xiàn)對我國法官的司法活動的監(jiān)督,營造一個良好的司法環(huán)境,確保司法正義的盡早實現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:The trial of all kinds of judicial cases in the society, judges have been playing a crucial role in decision-making and sentencing, therefore, as a judicial organ of law enforcement, judges can objective, fair, fair trial of cases. To maintain the public order and the legitimate rights and interests of litigants will have an equally important influence on the authority of our law and the credibility of our policy. Some judges abuse their power, pervert the law, practice favoritism, handle "relationship cases" and "human relations cases", violate laws and regulations, and pervert the law and adjudicate the law. In view of this, in order to maintain judicial justice, strengthen the supervision of our country's judges, improve the existing laws and regulations of the accountability of judges system. In recent years, our country has formulated and issued a number of levels of the system of investigating the responsibility of judges' miscarriage of justice. However, in the light of the actual situation, there is still no perfect mechanism of legal investigation in view of the current social cases, such as mistrial and misjudgment. In view of these problems, it has attracted the attention of the whole society, the judiciary and the academic circles. Therefore, the author tries to start with the concept of "wrong case" and the connotation and extension of the standard of investigating the responsibility of the wrong case. Through the comprehensive analysis of this system, this paper points out the shortcomings of the current system of investigating the responsibility of the judges in wrong cases, and the feasibility of investigating the responsibility of the wrong cases of judges in our country under the current social conditions. In order to provide reference for the smooth implementation of the system of investigating the responsibility of the wrong cases of judges, this paper discusses the deficiencies and perfection of the system of investigating the responsibility of the wrong cases of judges in different directions, such as defining the concept of wrong cases and unifying the standards of identification of the cases of wrong cases. In order to establish the system of investigating the responsibility of the judges in wrong cases in our country, and then to realize the supervision of the judicial activities of the judges in our country, to create a good judicial environment, and to ensure the early realization of the judicial justice.
【學位授予單位】：內(nèi)蒙古大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.2

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 時楠楠;我國法官錯案責任追究制度研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2017年

，

本文編號：1461774