本文關(guān)鍵詞： 法官行為 司法行為 法官管理 法官職業(yè)道德　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：近年來我國民眾對法院裁判的信任度是越來越低，這與對法官的公正性和中立性的質(zhì)疑不無關(guān)系。司法實(shí)踐中，，實(shí)施與其法官身份的中立性和公正性不相符的法官不在少數(shù)，如接受當(dāng)事人及其律師的宴請等等。產(chǎn)生上述情況的原因可能是多方面的，其中一個(gè)重要的原因就是對法官行為進(jìn)行規(guī)制的法律制度不完善。 本文以加州法官管理規(guī)則借評為題，分四個(gè)部分進(jìn)行論述。第一部分為加州法官管理規(guī)則的立法沿革，對加州法官管理規(guī)則的立法沿革及其立法理由進(jìn)行了論述。第二部分是對加州法官行為規(guī)則的具體內(nèi)容進(jìn)行描述。主要涉及對法官的職務(wù)活動、政治活動、金融活動、其他的司法外活動以及法官回避問題的規(guī)范，其對法官的規(guī)制涉及法官行為的方方面面，呈現(xiàn)出系統(tǒng)化的特征。第三部分的主要是對加州法官不端行為的處理機(jī)制進(jìn)行介紹。其中講述了法官不端行為的處理機(jī)構(gòu)及信息來源、法官不端行為的處理程序、救濟(jì)程序、信息的保密及公開五個(gè)方面的內(nèi)容。第四部分的主要內(nèi)容是加州法官管理規(guī)則對我國的借鑒意義。文章中對我國的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定的現(xiàn)狀及其不足進(jìn)行了分析。該部分總的來說分為兩部分，即加州法官行為規(guī)則對我國的借鑒意義（實(shí)體性部分）和加州法官不端行為處理機(jī)制對我國的借鑒意義（程序性部分）。在加州法官行為規(guī)制對我國的借鑒意義部分，文章中指出我國的相關(guān)規(guī)定存在相關(guān)法律的分散性和重復(fù)性、對法官業(yè)務(wù)外活動進(jìn)行規(guī)制的立法不合理、對法官行政性職責(zé)缺乏規(guī)制以及對法官的家庭成員的規(guī)制不合理四個(gè)方面的缺陷，并對這四個(gè)方面的完善提出了一些建議；在加州法官不端行為處理機(jī)制對我國的借鑒意義部分，文章中指出我國現(xiàn)行的法官不端行為處理機(jī)制存在處理部門的非中立性、證明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)不明確、救濟(jì)程序行政化等不足之處，并相應(yīng)的提出了解決方案。
[Abstract]:In recent years, our people's trust in court decisions is getting lower and lower, which has something to do with the impartiality and neutrality of judges. Judicial practice. There are not a few judges who are not in line with the neutrality and impartiality of their judges, such as accepting banquets from their clients and their lawyers, etc. The reasons for the above may be manifold. One of the important reasons is that the legal system of regulating the behavior of judges is not perfect. This article takes the California judge management rule as the title, divides into four parts to carry on the discussion. The first part is the California judge management rule legislative evolution. The second part is to describe the specific content of California judges' rules of conduct. It mainly involves the judges' official activities and political activities. The regulation of financial activities, other extra-judicial activities and the question of judges' recusal involves all aspects of judges' behavior. The third part mainly introduces the handling mechanism of California judge misconduct. It describes the processing mechanism and information source of the judge misconduct. The procedure for handling misconduct by a judge. The main content of part 4th is the reference meaning of California judge management rules to our country. The article analyzes the current situation and deficiency of the relevant laws and regulations in our country. The part is generally divided into two parts. That is, the reference meaning of California judge behavior rule to our country (substantive part) and the reference meaning of California judge misconduct handling mechanism to our country (procedural part); Part of the reference meaning of the behavior regulation of judges in California to our country. The article points out that the relevant provisions of our country have the dispersion and repeatability of the relevant laws, and the legislation to regulate the outside activities of judges is unreasonable. Lack of regulation of judges' administrative duties and unreasonable regulation of judges' family members, and some suggestions on the perfection of these four aspects are put forward. In the part of the reference meaning of California judge misconduct handling mechanism, the article points out that the existing judge misconduct handling mechanism in our country has the non-neutrality of the processing department, and the standard of proof is not clear. The administration of relief procedures and other deficiencies, and the corresponding solutions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張文靜;中芬“法官的地位與職責(zé)”研討會綜述[J];中國司法;2004年11期

2 于秀艷;論我國法官懲戒程序及其改革[J];法律適用;2003年09期

3 陶珂寶;日本和法國的法官懲戒制度簡介[J];法律適用;2003年09期

4 韓紅俊;;法官言論與公正審判[J];法律適用;2011年05期

5 徐靜村;潘金貴;;法官懲戒制度研究——兼論我國司法彈劾制度的建構(gòu)[J];公法研究;2004年00期

6 關(guān)毅 ,王瑞;“法官行為與司法懲戒”及“法院與媒體”比較研究國際研討會取得圓滿成功[J];法律適用;2003年11期

7 陳立;論建立我國司法獨(dú)立保障機(jī)制[J];河北法學(xué);1999年01期

8 汪貽飛;;論法官懲戒之事由[J];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會科學(xué)版);2010年04期

9 陳建貞;;職業(yè)化背景下法官性格的重塑[J];河南公安高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

10 吳述傳;論司法獨(dú)立對實(shí)現(xiàn)程序公正的保障[J];江西社會科學(xué);2000年06期

本文編號：1461270