本文關(guān)鍵詞： 刑事審判 自由裁量權(quán) 事實(shí)認(rèn)定 適用法律　出處：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：受多種因素的影響,法官在刑事審判中擁有自由裁量權(quán),刑事自由裁量權(quán)是指法官在審理案件的過程中,根據(jù)公平正義的原則、法律提供的原則,就案件基本事實(shí)、適用法律、裁判結(jié)果自由作出選擇的權(quán)力。對這樣一種權(quán)力如果不加控制的行使,將會導(dǎo)致多種惡劣的結(jié)果,因此,如何正確行使刑事自由裁量權(quán)、對濫用刑事自由裁量權(quán)的行為加以控制就成為值得研究的問題。對刑事審判自由裁量權(quán)的研究應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循從理論到實(shí)踐的基本邏輯,首先回答自由裁量權(quán)存在的基礎(chǔ)及實(shí)際意義,然后就如何正確行使自由裁量權(quán)進(jìn)行分析,接著介紹自由裁量權(quán)濫用的表現(xiàn)及危害,并就自由裁量權(quán)濫用的控制提出可能的解決方案,按照這樣的邏輯本文主要包括以下四個部分: 第一部分,基礎(chǔ)理論的介紹部分,界定了自由裁量權(quán)和刑事審判中自由裁量權(quán)的概念,為全文的研究作相應(yīng)的理論鋪墊,將刑事審判的自由裁量權(quán)限定為法官在刑事審判中的自由裁量權(quán),而不研究檢察官、警察在刑事案件中的自由裁量權(quán)。 第二部分,研究了刑事審判自由裁量權(quán)存在的基礎(chǔ)及其意義。由于成文法的局限性、法律解釋的不確定性和我國《刑法》的授權(quán),使得刑事自由裁量權(quán)的存在具有必要性和合理性。刑事審判自由裁量權(quán)的存在有利于克服成文法的局限、有利于增加司法的靈活性、有利于法官平衡各種利益而實(shí)現(xiàn)司法公正、有利于法官職業(yè)化的形成。 第三部分,研究了刑事審判自由裁量權(quán)的正確行使。刑事自由裁量權(quán)的行使應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循合法性、合目的性和合理性原則,在證據(jù)運(yùn)用、案件事實(shí)、適用法律三個方面正確行使自由裁量權(quán),對于影響刑事自由裁量權(quán)行使的外部因素也應(yīng)有所認(rèn)識,包括網(wǎng)絡(luò)輿情的影響、司法制度行政化以及行政和人大對于司法的干預(yù)。 第四部分,研究了刑事審判中自由裁量權(quán)的濫用及其控制。濫用表現(xiàn)在刑事自由裁量權(quán)的動機(jī)錯誤、刑罰顯示公平以及拖延審判,其危害了刑事各方主體的利益,損害了司法權(quán)威,破壞了法律面前人人平等的原則,對其應(yīng)從認(rèn)定事實(shí)和適用法律兩個角度加以控制。
[Abstract]:Influenced by many factors, the judge has the discretion in the criminal trial. The criminal discretion is the principle provided by the law according to the principle of fairness and justice in the course of hearing the case. With regard to the basic facts of the case, the application of the law and the right to choose freely the outcome of the judgment. If such a power is not exercised without control, it will lead to a variety of adverse results, therefore. How to correctly exercise the criminal discretion. It is worth studying to control the abuse of criminal discretion. The research on the discretion of criminal trial should follow the basic logic from theory to practice. First answer the basis and practical significance of the existence of discretion, then analyze how to exercise discretion correctly, and then introduce the performance and harm of discretion abuse. And put forward the possible solution to the control of discretion abuse, according to this logic, this paper mainly includes the following four parts: The first part, the introduction of the basic theory, defines the concept of discretion and discretion in criminal trial, and makes a theoretical foundation for the study of the full text. The discretion of the criminal trial is limited to the discretion of the judge in the criminal trial, without studying the discretion of the prosecutor and the police in the criminal case. The second part studies the foundation and significance of the discretion of criminal trial. Because of the limitation of statutory law, the uncertainty of legal interpretation and the authorization of criminal law in our country. The existence of criminal discretion is necessary and reasonable. The existence of criminal trial discretion is conducive to overcome the limitations of statutory law and increase the flexibility of the judiciary. It is beneficial for the judge to balance all kinds of interests and to realize the judicial justice and the formation of the judge professionalization. The third part studies the correct exercise of the discretion of criminal trial. The exercise of the discretion of criminal justice should follow the principles of legality, purpose and rationality, in the use of evidence, the facts of the case. Three aspects of the application of the law of the correct exercise of discretion, the exercise of the criminal discretion of the external factors should also be recognized, including the impact of network public opinion. The administration of the judicial system and the interference of the administration and the people's Congress in the administration of justice. In the 4th part, the author studies the abuse and control of the discretion in the criminal trial. The abuse is manifested in the error of the motive of the criminal discretion, the fairness of the penalty and the delay of the trial. It endangers the interests of all parties to the crime, damages the judicial authority, and undermines the principle of equality before the law. It should be controlled from the two angles of ascertaining the facts and applying the law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D924.1;D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董玉庭;董進(jìn)宇;;刑事自由裁量權(quán)負(fù)效應(yīng)及其克服[J];北方論叢;2006年02期

2 滕亞為;刑事自由裁量權(quán)的判例調(diào)控[J];渝州大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2002年05期

3 楊開湘;法官自由裁量權(quán)論綱[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;1997年02期

4 李永升;陳婕;;法官的刑事自由裁量權(quán)研究——以刑事實(shí)體控制為視角[J];海峽法學(xué);2011年01期

5 韓克芳;論我國法官刑事自由裁量權(quán)的合理行使[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報);2001年05期

6 曹建明;在公布《最高人民法院關(guān)于民事訴訟證據(jù)的若干規(guī)定》新聞發(fā)布會上的講話[J];法律適用(國家法官學(xué)院學(xué)報);2002年01期

7 袁江華;;刑事審判自由裁量權(quán)運(yùn)行機(jī)制研究 以自由裁量權(quán)的規(guī)范行使為視角[J];法律適用;2010年10期

8 張明楷;刑法理念與刑法解釋[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年04期

9 虞平;;量刑與刑的量化——兼論“電腦量刑”[J];法學(xué)家;2007年02期

10 祁向祥;華靜嫻;;法官刑事自由裁量權(quán)及其法律規(guī)制[J];法制與社會;2011年19期

，

本文編號：1455231