本文關(guān)鍵詞： 地級市 行政區(qū)劃 法律地位 改革目標(biāo)　出處：《河北大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：“地級市”這個(gè)稱謂現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)被我們廣泛使用，其實(shí)在中國古代封建社會，地方行政區(qū)劃中就逐漸產(chǎn)生了相當(dāng)于目前地級市這樣的行政層級，比如說明清時(shí)期的“府”、“州”（直隸州）就類似于現(xiàn)在的地級市。我國建國之初就明確規(guī)定地方行政區(qū)域劃分為省（自治區(qū)、直轄市）、縣（自治縣）、鄉(xiāng)（鎮(zhèn)、民族鄉(xiāng)）三級，地級市這個(gè)行政層級并不存在，但是由于我國幅員遼闊，省級行政區(qū)域數(shù)量較少，面積較大，管轄縣級行政區(qū)域數(shù)量較多，后來設(shè)置一些“專區(qū)”（后改為“地區(qū)”）作為省級政府的派出機(jī)構(gòu)，代為管理一些縣級行政區(qū)域，以此來減輕省級政府的負(fù)擔(dān)�！暗厥泻喜ⅰ敝埃〖壭姓䥇^(qū)域之下還管轄著大量的省轄市，這就形成了市區(qū)、地區(qū)并存的現(xiàn)象。自上個(gè)世紀(jì)八十年代開始，不少地方開始實(shí)行“地市合并”、“地改市”的措施，“地級市”這個(gè)介于省級和縣級行政區(qū)域之間的行政層級由此形成。我國目前有地級行政區(qū)域300多個(gè)。改革開放以來，這些地級行政區(qū)域的中心城區(qū)有了很大的發(fā)展，在未來加快城市化建設(shè)的進(jìn)程中，300多個(gè)地級行政區(qū)域的中心城區(qū)肩負(fù)著艱巨而又光榮的歷史任務(wù)。 地級市目前確實(shí)存在不少問題，包括法律方面的問題和行政管理方面的問題�，F(xiàn)階段，我國正在進(jìn)行“省直管縣”的改革和嘗試，不少專家和學(xué)者主張中國未來應(yīng)該取消地級市這個(gè)行政層級。理論上看這種主張對我國今后的發(fā)展十分有利，但是筆者持不同的觀點(diǎn)。筆者認(rèn)為，地級市的設(shè)置，從我國目前的實(shí)際情況來看還是很有必要的，，現(xiàn)在取消這個(gè)行政層級的條件還不成熟。當(dāng)務(wù)之急，我們應(yīng)該完善地級市的法律地位，在保留地級市的基礎(chǔ)之上再對地級市的區(qū)劃范圍、運(yùn)行模式等方面加以改革，這樣對我國的社會穩(wěn)定、經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展、城市化進(jìn)程都會有很大的促進(jìn)作用。本文對地級市的概念、類型、歷史沿革，地級市在現(xiàn)行法律中的地位，地級市目前存在的問題，“省直管縣”對地級市的地位帶來的沖擊，保留地級市的必要性等方面進(jìn)行了分析。在綜合上述分析的基礎(chǔ)之上，本文提出了完善地級市法律地位的途徑及地級市的改革目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:The term "prefecture-level city" has been widely used by us now, in fact, in ancient Chinese feudal society, the local administrative division gradually produced the administrative hierarchy equivalent to the current prefecture-level city. For example, in the Ming and Qing dynasties, the "prefectures" and "prefectures" (Zhili prefectures) were similar to the present prefecture-level cities. At the beginning of the founding of the people's Republic of China, it was clearly stipulated that the local administrative regions were divided into provinces (autonomous regions, municipalities directly under the Central Government) and counties (autonomous counties). Township (town, nationality township) three levels, prefecture-level city this administrative level does not exist, but due to the vast territory of our country, the number of provincial administrative regions is small, the area is large, the number of administrative areas at the county level is more. Later, some "special areas" (later changed to "regions") were set up as provincial government agencies to manage some administrative districts at the county level in order to lighten the burden on provincial governments... before "prefectural and municipal consolidation". Provincial administrative areas also have jurisdiction over a large number of provinces and municipalities, which has formed the phenomenon of the coexistence of urban areas and regions. Since -20s, many localities have begun to implement "prefectural and municipal mergers". The "prefecture-level city", the administrative level between the provincial and county administrative regions, has been formed. At present, there are more than 300 prefecture-level administrative regions in our country, and since the reform and opening up to the outside world. The central district of these prefectural administrative regions has developed greatly. In the process of speeding up the construction of urbanization in the future, more than 300 central districts of prefectural administrative regions are shouldering arduous and glorious historical tasks. At present, there are many problems in prefecture-level cities, including legal problems and administrative problems. At this stage, China is carrying out the reform and attempt of "managing counties directly by province". Many experts and scholars advocate that China should abolish the administrative hierarchy of prefecture-level cities in the future. Theoretically, this view is very beneficial to the future development of our country, but the author holds different views. The establishment of prefecture-level cities is still very necessary from the current actual situation in our country, and the conditions for abolishing this administrative hierarchy are still immature. It is imperative that we should improve the legal status of prefecture-level cities. On the basis of retaining prefecture-level cities, we should reform the regionalization scope and operation mode of prefecture-level cities, which will be beneficial to the social stability and economic development of our country. Urbanization process will have a great role in promoting. This article on the concept of prefecture-level cities, types, historical evolution, the status of prefecture-level cities in the current law, the existing problems of prefecture-level cities. The impact on the status of prefecture-level cities and the necessity of retaining prefecture-level cities are analyzed. This paper puts forward the ways to perfect the legal status of prefectural cities and the reform objectives of prefectural cities.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：河北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D921;D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 高宜程;申玉銘;王茂軍;劉希勝;;城市功能定位的理論和方法思考[J];城市規(guī)劃;2008年10期

2 云霞;徐斌林;;淺析我國“省管縣”體制改革[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年15期

3 寇明風(fēng);王曉哲;;省直管縣改革的三維視角:歷史經(jīng)驗(yàn)、西方模式與實(shí)踐問題[J];地方財(cái)政研究;2010年03期

4 陳晨;段廣軍;;從浙江經(jīng)驗(yàn)淺析省管縣制度[J];法制與社會;2008年02期

5 王開泳;;行政區(qū)劃視野下我國城市化發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀、問題與對策[J];工程研究-跨學(xué)科視野中的工程;2011年03期

6 楊宏山;黃永青;;我國地方行政層級改革的制度分析[J];甘肅行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

7 肖金成;完善地級市城市功能的若干對策[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)管理;2002年11期

8 寇鐵軍;周波;;我國省直管縣體制改革的實(shí)踐挑戰(zhàn)及推進(jìn)建議[J];湖南財(cái)政經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期

9 張京祥;;省直管縣改革與大都市區(qū)治理體系的建立[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2009年08期

10 魏晶雪;;減少行政層級的改革思考[J];現(xiàn)代經(jīng)濟(jì)探討;2008年01期

本文編號：1452081