話語(yǔ)權(quán)勢(shì)是批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析研究的重要課題。在吸取以Norman Fairclough為代表的批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析家對(duì)話語(yǔ)權(quán)勢(shì)的基本觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上,本文采用會(huì)話分析的方法,通過(guò)對(duì)語(yǔ)料的分析,探討了庭審英語(yǔ)會(huì)話中的話語(yǔ)權(quán)勢(shì)現(xiàn)象及權(quán)勢(shì)實(shí)現(xiàn)策略。論文首先簡(jiǎn)要回顧了批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析的發(fā)展史,其中重點(diǎn)論述了批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析的精髓,即權(quán)勢(shì)在批評(píng)性話語(yǔ)分析中的地位:第一,權(quán)勢(shì)與意識(shí)形態(tài)緊密相連;第二,權(quán)勢(shì)是實(shí)現(xiàn)目的的主要方式;第三,權(quán)勢(shì)的行使或者隱含,或者公開(kāi)。接著討論了格賴斯的會(huì)話合作原則及會(huì)話含義。最后,簡(jiǎn)要總結(jié)了庭審會(huì)話的特點(diǎn)。論文從兩個(gè)方面討論庭審會(huì)話中的權(quán)勢(shì)實(shí)現(xiàn)策略:問(wèn)句策略和對(duì)會(huì)話合作原則違背的策略。由于問(wèn)句具有參與性及對(duì)答案的期待,它被認(rèn)為是庭審會(huì)話中最主要的、必須的組成要素。法庭最基本的職責(zé)是對(duì)所有案件中社會(huì)行為的合法性做出判決,有罪的或無(wú)罪的。確信無(wú)疑,在法庭上只有那些擁有權(quán)力講話,做出選擇,能夠控制以及改變?cè)掝}的參與者才具有權(quán)威性,而問(wèn)句就可以幫助權(quán)勢(shì)方實(shí)施權(quán)勢(shì)。庭審會(huì)話中問(wèn)句對(duì)權(quán)勢(shì)的實(shí)施表現(xiàn)在三個(gè)方面。第一,對(duì)庭審會(huì)話話輪的控制;第二,對(duì)庭審會(huì)話話題的控制;第三,不同的問(wèn)句實(shí)施權(quán)勢(shì)的程度不同。... 

【文章來(lái)源】：西安電子科技大學(xué)陜西省 211工程院校 教育部直屬院校

【文章頁(yè)數(shù)】：64 頁(yè)

【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士

【文章目錄】：
創(chuàng)新性聲明
關(guān)于論文使用授權(quán)的說(shuō)明
摘 要
Abstract
Introduction
Chapter 1 Literature Review
    1.1 A Brief Survey of Critical Discourse Analysis
        1.1.1 The development of CDA
        1.1.2 Power as the central concern of CDA
    1.2 Relative Pragmatics Theories
        1.2.1 The co-operative principle
        1.2.2 Implcature in courtroom conversation
    1.3 Characteristics of Courtroom Conversation
        1.3.1 The courtroom communication
        1.3.2 Contextual meaning
Chapter 2 Questions in Courtroom Conversation
    2.1 Power as Overt in Courtroom Conversation
    2.2 Questions and Power Relation
        2.2.1 Turn-taking control
        2.2.2 Topic control
        2.2.3 Degree of different questions realizing power
    2.3 A Concrete Analysis of Questions in Courtroom Conversation
Chapter 3 Power Relations and Violation of the Co-operative Principle
    3.1 Violation of the Maxim of Relevance
    3.2 Violation of the Maxim of Quality
    3.3 Violation of the Maxim of Quantity
    3.4 Violation of the Maxim of Manners
Conclusion
Acknowledgement
Bibliography
在讀期間研究成果



本文編號(hào)：3428741