發(fā)布時(shí)間：2019-03-27 16:26

【摘要】：中國(guó)法律史研究應(yīng)該走向 "法學(xué)化"還是 "史學(xué)化",是學(xué)界關(guān)心的重要問(wèn)題。法律史學(xué)科位于法學(xué)學(xué)科建制中,長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)研究主力為法學(xué)出身的學(xué)者。法學(xué)研究者重在對(duì)歷史進(jìn)行闡釋、慣于演繹邏輯,常以西方法學(xué)概念、理論為前提,對(duì)中國(guó)法律進(jìn)行評(píng)判,因此目前法律史研究出現(xiàn)的主要問(wèn)題是史料基礎(chǔ)薄弱、西方中心主義與現(xiàn)代化范式泛濫。近些年大量史學(xué)出身的研究者進(jìn)入法律史領(lǐng)域,為法律史研究帶來(lái)新氣象�；谑穼W(xué)基礎(chǔ)薄弱的現(xiàn)狀,法律史研究應(yīng)當(dāng)走向史學(xué)化。在這一前提下,研究者個(gè)人應(yīng)追求法史兼修,學(xué)界應(yīng)加強(qiáng)分工合作。
[Abstract]:Whether the study of Chinese legal history should go to "legalization" or "historical study" is an important issue concerned by the academic circles. The subject of legal history is located in the system of legal discipline. For a long time, the main research force is a scholar of legal origin. Legal researchers focus on the interpretation of history, accustomed to deductive logic, often on the premise of western legal concepts and theories, to judge Chinese law, so the main problem in the study of legal history at present is the weak foundation of historical materials. Western centralism and the spread of the paradigm of modernization. In recent years, a large number of historical researchers entered the field of legal history, bringing a new atmosphere for the study of legal history. Based on the weak basis of historiography, the study of legal history should be historical. Under this premise, the researcher should pursue the history of law and the academic circles should strengthen the cooperation of division of work.
【作者單位】： 中國(guó)社會(huì)科學(xué)院近代史研究所;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 蘇亦工;法律史學(xué)研究方法問(wèn)題商榷[J];北方工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年04期

2 徐忠明;關(guān)于中國(guó)法律史研究的幾點(diǎn)省思[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2001年01期

3 劉廣安;;中國(guó)法史學(xué)基礎(chǔ)問(wèn)題反思[J];政法論壇;2006年01期

4 李顯冬;試論中國(guó)古代固有民法的開(kāi)放性體系[J];杭州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2003年05期

5 梁治平;法律史的墫界:方法、旨趣，

本文編號(hào)：2448349