【摘要】：在比較法研究中,中國法一直占有重要地位,但在主流的西方比較法文獻(xiàn)中,西方法是正統(tǒng),中國法只處于邊緣地位。法律在社會中不占主導(dǎo)地位,一直是西方人眼中中國傳統(tǒng)法的主要特點(diǎn)。西方學(xué)者認(rèn)為,中國傳統(tǒng)法具有專制主義、集權(quán)主義的特征,這同中國的"治水社會"的歷史有著密切聯(lián)系。改革開放以來中國經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會的發(fā)展,對西方有關(guān)中國法的觀點(diǎn)以及法律和社會發(fā)展的模式提出了挑戰(zhàn)。在法律的地位和集權(quán)與分權(quán)問題上,不應(yīng)把中國法與西方法絕對對立起來,西方和中國在處理熟人關(guān)系和陌生人關(guān)系,應(yīng)對正常狀態(tài)和非常狀態(tài)問題上有許多相近之處,它們是中國與西方共同面對的問題。把中國法研究放在西方各種法律進(jìn)化模式中雖然具有參考價值,但終歸是靠不住的,應(yīng)轉(zhuǎn)到以問題為中心的軌道。
[Abstract]:In the study of comparative law, Chinese law has always played an important role, but in the mainstream western comparative law literature, the western method is orthodox, and Chinese law is only in a marginal position. Law, which is not dominant in society, has always been the main feature of Chinese traditional law in Westerners' eyes. Western scholars believe that Chinese traditional law has the characteristics of authoritarianism and totalitarianism, which is closely related to the history of China's "water society". Since the reform and opening up, the development of Chinese economy and society has challenged the western views on Chinese law and the pattern of legal and social development. On the issue of legal status and centralization and decentralization, China's law and western methods should not be absolutely opposed to each other. There are many similarities between the West and China in dealing with the relationship between acquaintances and strangers, and in dealing with the problems of normal and extraordinary states. They are problems that China and the West face together. Although the study of Chinese law is of reference value in various legal evolution patterns in the west, it is unreliable in the end, and it should be transferred to the orbit of taking the problem as the center.
【作者單位】： 中國人民大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D904

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會議論文 前1條

1 周云;王瑞;李立;夏雪峰;孫之榮;;從蛋白質(zhì)進(jìn)化的模式預(yù)測蛋白質(zhì)的功能聯(lián)系[A];第十次中國生物物理學(xué)術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];2006年

，

本文編號：2447533