清“冒破物料”律與工程管理制度
[Abstract]:The so-called "broken material" generally means that in the process of official repairs, craftsmen and officials in charge bully materials, open false reports or inspectors know to help them, and neglect and delay. However, as the concept of "broken material" is a legislative concept, its connotation is also in the process of change with the change of content and scope given by the legislation. "broken material" is a major drawback in the construction of the Qing Dynasty project. It is a very common phenomenon for the construction of the temple of the palace room, the construction of the dike and the bridge, the storage of the small pieces of wood, the purchase of small materials, and the "breaking". In the beginning of Qing Dynasty, several codes inherited the regulation of "breaking materials" in Ming Law, and added and deleted it. Qianlong revised the Qing Law in the past five years (1740), consolidated and revised the increase in the crime of breaking materials in the early part of the Qing Dynasty, and formed the basic framework of the legislation on "the crime of breaking materials" in the "Qing Law". There has been no great change. This article tries to make textual research on the history of the law of "breaking through materials" in Qing Dynasty, tracing the attached regulations one by one, and analyzing the background and reasons of its change and development, which is the static analysis of "the crime of breaking materials". Through the phenomenon of "breaking materials" in the Qing Dynasty, this paper will investigate the implementation of the laws and regulations of "broken materials" in stages, and make a dynamic investigation on them. The structure of this paper consists of the following parts: the first chapter, introduction, mainly introduces the research object and scope, research significance and purpose, domestic and foreign research status, research ideas and historical materials used; The second chapter, from the macro point of view, to examine the law of "broken materials" history of the general situation. The article analyzes the nine regulations attached to the "broken Materials" law one by one, investigates the background and reasons of its development and evolution. Chapter three makes a detailed investigation on the management system of the project in the Qing Dynasty, with emphasis on the system of material evaluation and sale. In the fourth chapter, the author inspects the implementation of the "broken materials" in Qing Dynasty, and finally rethinks and comments on the development and implementation of the "broken materials" in Qing Dynasty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:南開(kāi)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:博士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D929;D924.3
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王海明;;清代奏銷(xiāo)制度淺析[J];安徽文學(xué)(下半月);2008年02期
2 周小明;論清代宮廷建筑工程建設(shè)程序及其檔案內(nèi)容[J];城建檔案;1997年02期
3 柏樺;明代州縣官的施政及障礙[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期
4 方寶璋;明代監(jiān)察官的兼職審計(jì)[J];當(dāng)代審計(jì);1994年02期
5 王志強(qiáng);論清代條例中的地區(qū)性特別法[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年02期
6 王璞子;清工部頒布的《工程做法》[J];故宮博物院院刊;1983年01期
7 高換婷;清代大高殿維修與使用的文獻(xiàn)記載[J];故宮博物院院刊;2003年04期
8 饒明奇;;論清代河工經(jīng)費(fèi)的管理[J];甘肅社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年03期
9 王海燕;;陵寢工程中的賠修制:以清東陵裕陵隆恩殿為例[J];河北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年05期
10 王振忠;河政與清代社會(huì)[J];湖北大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1994年02期
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 王大學(xué);明清江南海塘的建設(shè)與環(huán)境[D];復(fù)旦大學(xué);2007年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 曾輝;清代定陵建筑工程全案研究[D];天津大學(xué);2005年
,本文編號(hào):2408491
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2408491.html