南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度研究
發(fā)布時間：2018-10-15 17:48
【摘要】： 從清末變法修律開始,中國的刑事訴訟制度開始了現(xiàn)代化的歷史變革。到了南京國民政府統(tǒng)治時期,刑事訴訟制度在繼承清末民初的成果上繼續(xù)發(fā)展,刑事訴訟的法典化最終完成,在形式上實(shí)現(xiàn)了現(xiàn)代化。但是,南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度,在司法實(shí)踐過程中并沒有得到真正的施行,有的制度甚至向傳統(tǒng)的訴訟法律文化回溯。中國法制現(xiàn)代化的重要課題——傳統(tǒng)性與現(xiàn)代性之間的矛盾也在這一階段表現(xiàn)的十分突出。中國刑事訴訟制度的現(xiàn)代化過程,雖然進(jìn)程坎坷、步履維艱,但是從總體上的發(fā)展趨勢上來講,是曲折前進(jìn)的,其進(jìn)步意義和歷史借鑒價值是值得我們認(rèn)真研究的。 本文以1927-1949年南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度為研究對象。第一部分主要對南京國民政府的刑事訴訟立法進(jìn)行研究。在簡要梳理清末民初刑事訴訟立法的基礎(chǔ)上,首先對南京國民政府1928年和1935年的兩部刑事訴訟法典進(jìn)行分析研究,然后分析南京國民政府法院組織法的制定與頒行。第二部分,本文主要研究南京國民政府的刑事訴訟模式,分析了其刑事訴訟模式的理論淵源與價值取向。第三部分,本文對南京國民政府時期的刑事訴訟檢察制度與審判制度進(jìn)行研究,力圖真實(shí)的展現(xiàn)這一時期刑事訴訟制度的全景,加深對刑事訴訟制度的理性認(rèn)識。最后筆者從宏觀層面就南京國民政府刑事訴訟制度進(jìn)行了評議,提出了粗略的看法。筆者認(rèn)為南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度的現(xiàn)代化具有整體性的特點(diǎn),集中體現(xiàn)了法制現(xiàn)代化過程中的傳統(tǒng)性與現(xiàn)代性的矛盾。但是,南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度對司法秩序與司法效率的追求的特點(diǎn),也使得其以維護(hù)統(tǒng)治秩序的穩(wěn)定為價值目標(biāo),成為了維護(hù)南京國民政府專制統(tǒng)治的工具。司法黨化,司法經(jīng)費(fèi)及司法人才的短缺等諸多原因,使得南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度沒有在司法實(shí)踐過程中發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的價值,這也是其歷史局限性之所在。綜觀南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度,筆者認(rèn)為,成功的法制的變革離不開政治制度的進(jìn)步和法律文化的建設(shè),這也是我們今天的刑事訴訟制度改革所值得借鑒的。我們應(yīng)當(dāng)冷靜的對待南京國民政府的刑事訴訟制度,對其進(jìn)行科學(xué)的研究和客觀的總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:From the end of Qing Dynasty, the criminal procedure system of China began to reform the modern history. In the period of Nanjing National Government, the criminal procedure system continued to develop in succession to the achievements of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, the codification of criminal proceedings was finally completed, and the form of modernization was realized. However, the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government has not been carried out in the judicial practice, and some systems even go back to the traditional legal culture of litigation. The contradiction between tradition and modernity, an important subject of the modernization of Chinese legal system, is also prominent in this stage. Although the process of modernization of China's criminal procedure system is bumpy and difficult, the overall development trend is twists and turns, and its progressive significance and historical reference value are worthy of our careful study. This article takes the criminal procedure system of Nanjing National Government from 1927-1949 as the research object. The first part mainly studies the criminal procedure legislation of Nanjing National Government. On the basis of briefly combing the criminal procedure legislation of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, this paper first analyzes the two codes of criminal procedure of the Nanjing National Government in 1928 and 1935, and then analyzes the establishment and enactment of the law on the law of the courts of the Nanjing National Government. In the second part, this paper mainly studies the criminal procedure model of Nanjing National Government, and analyzes its theoretical origin and value orientation. The third part, this article carries on the research to the criminal procedure procuratorial system and the trial system in the Nanjing national government period, tries to truly display this period criminal procedure system panorama, deepens the rational understanding to the criminal procedure system. Finally, the author comments on the criminal procedure system of Nanjing National Government from the macro level, and puts forward a rough view. The author holds that the modernization of the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government has the characteristics of integrity, which embodies the contradiction between the tradition and modernity in the process of the modernization of the legal system. However, the pursuit of judicial order and judicial efficiency in the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government also makes it a valuable goal to maintain the stability of the ruling order and has become a tool to safeguard the autocratic rule of the Nanjing National Government. The judicial party, the shortage of judicial funds and judicial talents make the criminal litigation system of Nanjing National Government not play its due value in the judicial practice, which is also its historical limitations. Looking at the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government, the author thinks that the successful legal system reform can not be separated from the progress of the political system and the construction of the legal culture, which is also worthy of our reference in the reform of the criminal procedure system today. We should treat the criminal procedure system of Nanjing National Government calmly, carry on scientific research and objective summary to it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D925.2;D929
本文編號：2273327
[Abstract]:From the end of Qing Dynasty, the criminal procedure system of China began to reform the modern history. In the period of Nanjing National Government, the criminal procedure system continued to develop in succession to the achievements of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, the codification of criminal proceedings was finally completed, and the form of modernization was realized. However, the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government has not been carried out in the judicial practice, and some systems even go back to the traditional legal culture of litigation. The contradiction between tradition and modernity, an important subject of the modernization of Chinese legal system, is also prominent in this stage. Although the process of modernization of China's criminal procedure system is bumpy and difficult, the overall development trend is twists and turns, and its progressive significance and historical reference value are worthy of our careful study. This article takes the criminal procedure system of Nanjing National Government from 1927-1949 as the research object. The first part mainly studies the criminal procedure legislation of Nanjing National Government. On the basis of briefly combing the criminal procedure legislation of the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China, this paper first analyzes the two codes of criminal procedure of the Nanjing National Government in 1928 and 1935, and then analyzes the establishment and enactment of the law on the law of the courts of the Nanjing National Government. In the second part, this paper mainly studies the criminal procedure model of Nanjing National Government, and analyzes its theoretical origin and value orientation. The third part, this article carries on the research to the criminal procedure procuratorial system and the trial system in the Nanjing national government period, tries to truly display this period criminal procedure system panorama, deepens the rational understanding to the criminal procedure system. Finally, the author comments on the criminal procedure system of Nanjing National Government from the macro level, and puts forward a rough view. The author holds that the modernization of the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government has the characteristics of integrity, which embodies the contradiction between the tradition and modernity in the process of the modernization of the legal system. However, the pursuit of judicial order and judicial efficiency in the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government also makes it a valuable goal to maintain the stability of the ruling order and has become a tool to safeguard the autocratic rule of the Nanjing National Government. The judicial party, the shortage of judicial funds and judicial talents make the criminal litigation system of Nanjing National Government not play its due value in the judicial practice, which is also its historical limitations. Looking at the criminal procedure system of the Nanjing National Government, the author thinks that the successful legal system reform can not be separated from the progress of the political system and the construction of the legal culture, which is also worthy of our reference in the reform of the criminal procedure system today. We should treat the criminal procedure system of Nanjing National Government calmly, carry on scientific research and objective summary to it.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D925.2;D929
【引證文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 管津君;南京國民政府時期檢察制度研究[D];天津商業(yè)大學(xué);2013年
，本文編號：2273327
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2273327.html
