【摘要】：金融危機(jī)背景下貿(mào)易保護(hù)主義有所抬頭、反壟斷法域外適用的單邊主義增強(qiáng)和私人訴訟的巨額賠償刺激是美國(guó)反壟斷法頻繁域外適用的主要?jiǎng)右?應(yīng)從企業(yè)、行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)和國(guó)家層面采取積極措施,形成聯(lián)動(dòng)應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制,有效應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)反壟斷法律風(fēng)險(xiǎn),保護(hù)我國(guó)出口企業(yè)的利益。為應(yīng)對(duì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)及挑戰(zhàn),需要我國(guó)企業(yè)、行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)和政府互相配合,建立系統(tǒng)的預(yù)警和應(yīng)對(duì)機(jī)制以有效應(yīng)對(duì),建議企業(yè)層面:規(guī)避反壟斷法域外適用風(fēng)險(xiǎn);積極應(yīng)對(duì)反壟斷指揮;建立出口數(shù)據(jù)指標(biāo)庫(kù),協(xié)助構(gòu)建反壟斷預(yù)警機(jī)制。行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)層面:建立科學(xué)完善的反壟斷預(yù)警機(jī)制,規(guī)避式降低反壟斷域外適用風(fēng)險(xiǎn);增強(qiáng)協(xié)調(diào)組織服務(wù)能力,協(xié)助企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)反壟斷指揮。國(guó)家層面:細(xì)化和制定出口長(zhǎng)特爾豁免制度、登記制度;出口阻卻性法規(guī)應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)反壟斷法域外適用;針對(duì)影響我國(guó)的外國(guó)出口卡特爾制定調(diào)查和訴訟制度。
[Abstract]:Under the background of the financial crisis, trade protectionism is on the rise. The enhancement of unilateralism in the extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law and the huge compensation stimulus of private litigation are the main reasons for the frequent extraterritorial application of anti-monopoly law in the United States. Trade associations and national level take active measures to form a linkage mechanism to effectively deal with the American anti-monopoly legal risks and protect the interests of our export enterprises. In order to deal with the risks and challenges, it is necessary for Chinese enterprises, trade associations and governments to cooperate with each other and establish a systematic early warning and response mechanism to deal with them effectively. Establish export data index database to help build anti-monopoly warning mechanism. The level of trade association: establish a scientific and perfect antitrust warning mechanism, reduce the risk of anti-monopoly extraterritorial application, strengthen the ability of coordinating organization and service, and assist enterprises to deal with anti-monopoly command. At the national level: the system of exemption and registration should be refined and formulated; the laws and regulations of export resistance should apply to the extraterritorial application of American anti-monopoly law; and the investigation and litigation system should be established against the foreign export cartels that affect our country.
【作者單位】： 重慶大學(xué)法學(xué)院(四川外語(yǔ)學(xué)院國(guó)際商學(xué)院);
【基金】：重慶市涉外企業(yè)貿(mào)易權(quán)益保護(hù)中心重大課題攻關(guān)項(xiàng)目“外國(guó)反壟斷法對(duì)我國(guó)企業(yè)貿(mào)易權(quán)益的侵害及法律對(duì)策研究”的階段性成果
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：F752.02;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 陳力;;海牙取證公約在我國(guó)涉外民商事審判中的適用[J];東方法學(xué);2010年01期

2 鄭鵬程;;美國(guó)反壟斷法三倍損害賠償制度研究[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;2006年02期

3 孟雁北;反壟斷法視野中的行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)[J];云南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2004年03期

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董新凱;俞佳;;論反壟斷法中的民事責(zé)任[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年06期

2 盛杰民;焦海濤;;論中國(guó)反壟斷法對(duì)行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)的規(guī)制[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

3 玄玉寶;;簡(jiǎn)論美國(guó)反托拉斯法私人實(shí)施及我國(guó)取向[J];研究生法學(xué);2008年05期

4 夏藝菡;;論美國(guó)反托拉斯法私人執(zhí)行制度對(duì)我國(guó)執(zhí)法的啟示[J];當(dāng)代經(jīng)濟(jì);2011年13期

5 王健;;反壟斷法私人執(zhí)行的優(yōu)越性及其實(shí)現(xiàn)——兼論中國(guó)反壟斷法引入私人執(zhí)行制度的必要性和立法建議[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期

6 陳潔;;反壟斷法私人執(zhí)行的集團(tuán)公益訴訟模式[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2011年03期

7 孫晉;;我國(guó)《反壟斷法》法律責(zé)任制度的缺失及其完善[J];法律適用;2009年11期

8 夏利民;;行業(yè)協(xié)會(huì)反壟斷法規(guī)制的法律思考[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年06期

9 孫s，

本文編號(hào)：2273434