【摘要】： 本文第一章從法律史學(xué)角度簡(jiǎn)單介紹了美國(guó)反傾銷的發(fā)展歷史。該部分首先介紹了傾銷理論以及反傾銷立法的起源。該部分其次介紹了美國(guó)反傾銷立法的發(fā)展歷史。該部分最后簡(jiǎn)單介紹了美國(guó)現(xiàn)行的反傾銷程序法和實(shí)體法。 本文第二章主要介紹了美國(guó)反傾銷中非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展。該部分首先介紹了國(guó)際反傾銷中非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展,介紹了國(guó)際層面上非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題的產(chǎn)生的經(jīng)濟(jì)和歷史政治原因。該部分其次介紹了美國(guó)反傾銷中非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展以及最終形成,并介紹了美國(guó)對(duì)轉(zhuǎn)型經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家的非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的新嘗試。 本文第三章研究了美國(guó)現(xiàn)行的非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則。該部分首先介紹了美國(guó)對(duì)非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)國(guó)家的定義和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)以及相關(guān)的程序規(guī)則。該部分其次介紹了美國(guó)非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則中的單獨(dú)稅率規(guī)則,研究了全國(guó)統(tǒng)一稅率和單獨(dú)稅率的區(qū)別,單獨(dú)稅率的測(cè)試方法,聯(lián)合稅率和通過單獨(dú)測(cè)試的非強(qiáng)制應(yīng)訴企業(yè)的稅率等相關(guān)問題。該部分最后介紹了正常價(jià)值的計(jì)算方法,研究了替代國(guó)的選擇和根據(jù)生產(chǎn)要素方法計(jì)算正常價(jià)值以及其他相關(guān)問題。 本文第四章研究了美國(guó)對(duì)華反傾銷中對(duì)非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的濫用。筆者首先使用數(shù)據(jù)比較的方法分析了美國(guó)濫用非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)的總體影響,其次具體研究了美國(guó)濫用非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的各個(gè)方面,并佐以數(shù)據(jù)分析和案例。在具體研究美國(guó)濫用非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則各個(gè)方面時(shí),該部分首先研究了美國(guó)拒絕給予中國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)待遇的具體原因并合理預(yù)測(cè)美國(guó)不會(huì)提前給予中國(guó)市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)待遇。該部分其次研究了美國(guó)商務(wù)部拒絕承認(rèn)中國(guó)產(chǎn)業(yè)是市場(chǎng)導(dǎo)向產(chǎn)業(yè)部門以及擅自修改單獨(dú)稅率規(guī)則增加中國(guó)企業(yè)獲得單獨(dú)稅率的難度的濫用規(guī)則行為。該部分最后研究了美國(guó)商務(wù)部在計(jì)算被調(diào)查產(chǎn)品的正常價(jià)值時(shí)的濫用行為,并以浙江某企業(yè)應(yīng)訴美國(guó)對(duì)中國(guó)部分聚酯短纖反傾銷調(diào)查一案為例作了具體介紹。 本文第五章重點(diǎn)研究了中國(guó)應(yīng)對(duì)美國(guó)濫用非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的策略。該部分首先提出的策略是中國(guó)政府應(yīng)改變觀念,積極利用WTO的爭(zhēng)端解決機(jī)制制止美國(guó)濫用非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的行為,加速非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的消亡。該部分其次探討了中國(guó)企業(yè)利用對(duì)外投資沖破非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則的枷鎖的可能性,分析了中國(guó)企業(yè)利用對(duì)外投資塑造合適替代國(guó)的可行性和具體操作。
[Abstract]:The first chapter briefly introduces the history of American anti-dumping from the angle of legal history. This part first introduces the theory of dumping and the origin of anti-dumping legislation. The second part introduces the history of anti-dumping legislation in the United States. At the end of this part, the author briefly introduces the current anti-dumping procedural law and substantive law in the United States. The second chapter mainly introduces the emergence and development of non-market economy rules of anti-dumping in the United States. This part first introduces the emergence and development of non-market economy rules of international anti-dumping, and introduces the economic and historical political reasons for the emergence of non-market economy problems at the international level. Secondly, this part introduces the emergence, development and final formation of the non-market economy rules of the United States anti-dumping, and introduces the new attempt of the United States to the non-market economy rules of the countries in transition. The third chapter of this paper studies the current non-market economy rules in the United States. This part first introduces the definition and standards of non-market economy countries and the relevant rules of procedure. The second part introduces the individual tax rate rules in the non-market economy rules of the United States, studies the difference between the national uniform tax rate and the individual tax rate, and the test method of the individual tax rate. Related issues such as joint tax rates and tax rates of non-compulsory responding enterprises that have passed separate tests. At the end of this part, the calculation method of normal value is introduced, the choice of surrogate country, the calculation of normal value according to production factor method and other related problems are studied. Chapter four studies the abuse of non-market economy rules in American anti-dumping against China. The author first analyzes the overall influence of the abuse of non-market economy rules in the United States on Chinese enterprises by using the method of data comparison, and then studies each aspect of the abuse of non-market economy rules in the United States, and adds data analysis and cases. In this part, the author first studies the reasons why the United States refuses to give China market economy treatment and reasonably predicts that the United States will not give China market economy treatment ahead of time. In the second part, the author studies the abuse behavior of the American Department of Commerce, which refuses to recognize Chinese industry as a market-oriented industry department and unlawfully modifies the separate tax rate rules to increase the difficulty for Chinese enterprises to obtain separate tax rates. In the end of this part, the abuse behavior of the US Department of Commerce in calculating the normal value of the products under investigation is studied, and a case of anti-dumping investigation of some polyester staple fibers in China by an enterprise in Zhejiang Province is introduced in detail. The fifth chapter focuses on China's strategy to deal with the abuse of non-market economy rules in the United States. The first strategy put forward in this part is that the Chinese government should change its concept, actively use the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO to stop the abuse of the non-market economy rules in the United States, and accelerate the demise of the non-market economy rules. Secondly, this part discusses the possibility of Chinese enterprises breaking through the shackles of non-market economy rules by using foreign investment, and analyzes the feasibility and concrete operation of Chinese enterprises using foreign investment to shape suitable surrogate countries.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D996.1;DD912.29;D971.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳振宇;;歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷中市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題淺析[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年03期

2 張新娟;;歐盟反傾銷法非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)規(guī)則研究[J];法學(xué)家;2003年06期

3 吳秋芬;;淺談歐盟反傾銷法中的非市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)問題[J];中國(guó)高新技術(shù)企業(yè);2007年03期

4 信虎強(qiáng);彭劍波;;發(fā)展中國(guó)家對(duì)華反傾銷的現(xiàn)狀、原因及對(duì)策探析[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(下半月);2007年11期

5 王曉非;歐盟對(duì)華反傾銷實(shí)踐中的不合理因素及對(duì)策選擇[J];黨政干部學(xué)刊;2005年01期

6 黃娟;;中美貿(mào)易摩擦淺論[J];求實(shí);2006年S3期

7 陶明;鄧競(jìng)魁;;美國(guó)對(duì)華“反補(bǔ)貼”貿(mào)易策略的選擇研究[J];理論界;2009年11期

8 潘悅;美國(guó)對(duì)華反傾銷:特征與走勢(shì)[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2005年06期

9 賈琳;;入世后美國(guó)對(duì)華經(jīng)貿(mào)政策的兩面性[J];紅旗文稿;2003年17期

10 馮學(xué)智;中國(guó)企業(yè)應(yīng)對(duì)反傾銷實(shí)體策略分析[J];甘肅理論學(xué)刊;2005年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 秦永和;秦臻;;反傾銷會(huì)計(jì)——美國(guó)對(duì)華反傾銷預(yù)警模型研究[A];中國(guó)會(huì)計(jì)學(xué)會(huì)2007年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集（上冊(cè)）[C];2007年

2 于津平;郭曉菁;;對(duì)華反傾銷的宏觀經(jīng)濟(jì)與政治因素研究[A];江蘇省外國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)說(shuō)研究會(huì)2010年學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2010年

3 沈國(guó)兵;;美國(guó)對(duì)華反傾銷的主要決定因素及其影響效應(yīng)：經(jīng)驗(yàn)研究[A];上海市社會(huì)科學(xué)界第五屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集（2007年度）（經(jīng)濟(jì)·管理學(xué)科卷）[C];2007年

4 侯淑波;;市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位:消除國(guó)際對(duì)華反傾銷不公正性的關(guān)鍵[A];《WTO法與中國(guó)論壇》文集——中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會(huì)年會(huì)論文集(四)[C];2005年

5 侯淑波;;市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)地位:消除國(guó)際對(duì)華反傾銷不公正性的關(guān)鍵[A];《WTO法與中國(guó)論壇》文集——中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會(huì)年會(huì)論文集(三)[C];2004年

6 吳小琛;;美國(guó)對(duì)華反傾銷九月無(wú)戰(zhàn)事[A];中華全國(guó)律師協(xié)會(huì)WTO專門委員會(huì)2005年年會(huì)會(huì)議手冊(cè)[C];2005年

7 王雪華;;我國(guó)面臨的貿(mào)易爭(zhēng)端形勢(shì)與對(duì)策[A];中華全國(guó)律師協(xié)會(huì)WTO專門委員會(huì)2005年年會(huì)會(huì)議手冊(cè)[C];2005年

8 王磊;成坤;;加入WTO以來(lái)的中歐貿(mào)易摩擦——法律框架與典型案例[A];《WTO法與中國(guó)論壇》文集——中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會(huì)年會(huì)論文集(七)[C];2008年

9 楊仕輝;李文憬;;中美貿(mào)易摩擦特點(diǎn)、原因及中美經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系展望[A];“美國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)中長(zhǎng)期趨勢(shì)及其對(duì)中美經(jīng)貿(mào)關(guān)系的影響”研討會(huì)論文集[C];2006年

10 王磊;成坤;;加入WTO以來(lái)的中歐盟貿(mào)易摩擦——法律框架與典型案例[A];中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)世界貿(mào)易組織法研究會(huì)二○○七年年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 本報(bào)記者 孫楠;俄白哈對(duì)華反傾銷并非主流[N];國(guó)際商報(bào);2011年

2 ;２００３年美國(guó)９次對(duì)華反傾銷[N];中國(guó)質(zhì)量報(bào);2004年

3 記者 裴s，

本文編號(hào)：2222719