【摘要】：隨著改革開放的不斷深入和社會觀念的不斷改變，性犯罪呈現出種種新現象和新特征。性犯罪主體和性行為方式呈現出多樣化，以至于在傳統(tǒng)意義上對性犯罪的認識和有關性犯罪的規(guī)定已經不能完全涵蓋新形勢下的性犯罪行為，，現行刑法關于對性犯罪的立法規(guī)制已經不足以應對性犯罪的產生新變化。1984年出臺的司法解釋在針對具體司法實踐中強奸罪的認定和具體法律應用上也存在一些局限性，法律規(guī)定滯后性顯現無遺，完善對性犯罪的法律規(guī)定已經是刻不容緩的事情，值得進一步思考和研究。 本案中“精液治病”行為，究竟能否認定為性犯罪中新出現的行為方式，還尚存爭議，值得思考和商榷。本案中，對精液入藥的科學性以及案件本身的爭議已成為廣大民眾關注的焦點，然而，對“精液治病”行為的法律認定問題，更是本案爭議的主要焦點，是準確判定處理案件的關鍵所在。筆者希望通過對此案的分析探討和研究，提出自己的建議，以為促進我國刑法完善性犯罪的規(guī)定貢獻微薄之力。本文共17600余字，主要從四個方面進行闡述，具體內容為：一是介紹案例的基本情況，分別對案件的案由、案情介紹、分歧意見、爭議焦點等內容進行介紹；二是就“精液治病”行為所涉及法律問題從三個方面進行法理分析，并對本案的爭議內容涉及的強奸和猥褻進行了簡單的比較分析；三是結合案情和法律問題的法理分析，對本案從精液給進方式、行為人主觀方面和客觀方面等三個方面進行了全面詳細的分析，并進行總結，然后得出本案結論，另外，對本案法院的終審判決和處理提出了個人的建議；四是通過本案的分析和探討，得出完善關于性犯罪在立法及司法實踐中的啟示，并提出個人建議，希望通過法律上的完善更加利于女性權利的保護，維護女性的合法權益。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening up and the continuous change of social concepts, sexual crimes have shown a variety of new phenomena and new features. The subject of sexual crimes and sexual behavior patterns have shown diversification, so that the traditional understanding of sexual crimes and the provisions of sexual crimes can not fully cover the new situation of sexual crimes. The legislative regulation of sexual crimes in criminal law is not enough to cope with the new changes of sexual crimes.The judicial interpretation issued in 1984 also has some limitations in the identification and application of the specific law in specific judicial practice. Slow things deserve further consideration and study.
In this case, the scientific nature of semen medication and the controversy over the case itself have become the focus of public concern. However, the legal determination of semen treatment is even more important in this case. The main focus of the controversy is the key to the accurate judgment and handling of the case. The author hopes to put forward his own suggestions through the analysis and study of the case, in order to promote the perfection of the provisions of the criminal law in China to make a modest contribution. The basic situation of the case, respectively, the case, the introduction of the case, divergent opinions, the focus of controversy and other content are introduced; the second is the legal analysis of the legal issues involved in the "semen treatment" behavior from three aspects, and the case involved in the controversy of rape and indecency carried out a simple comparative analysis; the third is combined with the case and law; Jurisprudential analysis of the legal issues, a comprehensive and detailed analysis of the case from the semen feeding way, the subjective and objective aspects of the actor, and summarized, and then draw the conclusion of the case, in addition, the court of this case final judgment and treatment of personal recommendations; 4 through the analysis and discussion of the case, come to the end Good about sexual crimes in the legislative and judicial practice of the enlightenment, and put forward personal suggestions, hope that through the improvement of the law is more conducive to the protection of women's rights, safeguard women's legitimate rights and interests.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D924.3;D920.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 畢敏;彭麗娜;;認定強制猥褻不應以性接觸為必要條件[J];中國檢察官;2012年02期

2 趙媛媛;;辨析強奸罪中的“欺騙手段”[J];中小企業(yè)管理與科技(上旬刊);2010年12期

本文編號：2222443