【摘要】：“自然法權(quán)（權(quán)利）為何存在、如何存在、怎樣規(guī)范？”這是貫穿德沃金思想脈絡(luò)最為核心的線索。 自然法權(quán)為何存在？法理學(xué)是政治哲學(xué)的一部分，這發(fā)源于更為深廣的道德領(lǐng)域。更確切地說(shuō)，，這種政治道德背景是保證每個(gè)人平等地位而追求最佳資源分配狀況的資源平等命題。這種融貫原則的核心在于每個(gè)人平等尊重自己和他人，同時(shí)必須發(fā)展屬于自己的本真性的尊嚴(yán)原則命題。 自然法權(quán)如何存在？司法解釋權(quán)利的過(guò)程的就是認(rèn)可尊嚴(yán)的過(guò)程，是將權(quán)利的背景自然性逐步正式化，轉(zhuǎn)變?yōu)橹贫刃问降倪^(guò)程。道德權(quán)利是自然法權(quán)的幼年期，經(jīng)過(guò)司法解釋的“轉(zhuǎn)正”，原本的自然權(quán)利就成了法律權(quán)利——權(quán)利命題。 怎樣規(guī)范自然法權(quán)？自然法權(quán)作為政治道德概念，其性質(zhì)最終是價(jià)值性（尤其是道德性）。法律的客觀性最終取決于價(jià)值領(lǐng)域的客觀。這是一種不同于科學(xué)客觀的客觀，是需要經(jīng)過(guò)理性論辯證成，能夠信服自己并信服其他人，并最終實(shí)現(xiàn)多種本真價(jià)值間的融會(huì)貫通、協(xié)調(diào)統(tǒng)一，讓每一項(xiàng)價(jià)值（包括對(duì)手價(jià)值）最后都是贏家——價(jià)值統(tǒng)一命題。政治道德的客觀真理在具體法律個(gè)案中的映射就是每一項(xiàng)案件有既事實(shí)上符合又價(jià)值上證成對(duì)象實(shí)踐的最佳解釋，這就是該案的唯一正解。
[Abstract]:"Why do natural law rights (rights) exist, how do they regulate them?" This is the most central clue that runs through the thread of Dworkin's thought. Why does the right of natural law exist? Jurisprudence is a part of political philosophy, which originates from the broader realm of morality. More precisely, this political and moral background is a proposition of resource equality to ensure everyone's equal status and to pursue the best resource allocation. The core of this principle lies in the equal respect for oneself and others, and the development of the principle of dignity which belongs to one's own truth. How does the right of natural law exist? The process of judicial interpretation of rights is the process of recognizing dignity, which is the process of gradually formalizing the background of rights and transforming them into institutional forms. Moral right is the infancy of natural legal right. After judicial interpretation, the original natural right becomes legal right-right proposition. How to regulate the right of natural law? As a concept of political morality, the nature of the right of natural law is value (especially morality). The objectivity of law ultimately depends on the objectivity in the field of value. This is a kind of objectivity different from scientific objectivity. It needs to be dialectically formed by rational theory, be able to convince itself and convince other people, and finally realize the integration and harmonization of various true values. Let every value (including the rival value) end up as a winner-a unified proposition of value. The reflection of the objective truth of political morality in the specific legal cases is that every case has the best explanation of both the fact and the value of the object practice, which is the only correct solution of the case.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D909.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 布萊恩·萊特;吳展;;帝國(guó)的終結(jié):德沃金及21世紀(jì)法理學(xué)——在拉特格斯大學(xué)法哲學(xué)學(xué)院成立慶典上的演講[J];比較法研究;2007年01期

2 張薇薇;逝去的杯與劍[J];讀書;2004年03期

3 方新軍;;權(quán)利概念的歷史[J];法學(xué)研究;2007年04期

4 高鴻鈞;;權(quán)利源于主體間商談——哈貝馬斯的權(quán)利理論解析[J];清華法學(xué);2008年02期

5 大衛(wèi)·貝爾韋斯;馬歇爾·柯亨;泮翰殿;;德沃金其人及其思想[J];環(huán)球法律評(píng)論;1983年01期

6 鄧聯(lián)繁;;基本權(quán)利學(xué)理分類的意義與方法研究[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年04期

7 鄭成良;;權(quán)利本位論——兼與封日賢同志商榷[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);1991年01期

8 鄭成良;;權(quán)利本位說(shuō)[J];政治與法律;1989年04期

本文編號(hào)：2204957