天堂国产午夜亚洲专区-少妇人妻综合久久蜜臀-国产成人户外露出视频在线-国产91传媒一区二区三区

當(dāng)前位置:主頁(yè) > 法律論文 > 法史論文 >

立法程序民主研究

發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-07-05 11:18

  本文選題:立法 + 立法程序。 參考:《重慶大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文


【摘要】: 立法是一個(gè)關(guān)系國(guó)計(jì)民生的重大問(wèn)題。立法的成敗直接關(guān)系到廣大人民的切身利益,關(guān)系到國(guó)家發(fā)展的千秋大業(yè)。民主作為一種政治制度和國(guó)家形式,其精神內(nèi)涵和基本要求就是實(shí)行立法民主,即立法只有體現(xiàn)民情和順應(yīng)民意才具有合法性基礎(chǔ)和正當(dāng)性前提。立法程序民主是立法民主化的基本要求和具體體現(xiàn),是立法符合大多數(shù)人民意志和利益的重要保障。我國(guó)素有“重實(shí)體,輕程序”的傳統(tǒng),長(zhǎng)期以來(lái)對(duì)立法程序民主的忽視,給我國(guó)社會(huì)主義民主法制建設(shè)帶來(lái)了一些消極影響。隨著時(shí)代的發(fā)展和社會(huì)的進(jìn)步,立法程序民主化己經(jīng)成為民主法制建設(shè)中不可逆擋的歷史潮流。本文以此為契機(jī),深入思考了立法程序民主這一既有豐富實(shí)踐又有深厚理論的新問(wèn)題。本文主體部分共分四章。 第一章闡釋了立法程序民主的一般理論,并對(duì)立法程序民主等相關(guān)概念的內(nèi)涵、外延進(jìn)行清晰的界定。 第二章比較中西方國(guó)家立法程序民主制度的主要差異。 第三章總結(jié)我國(guó)立法程序的特點(diǎn),提出我國(guó)在民主立法程序中存在的問(wèn)題及反思。 第四章就我國(guó)民主立法程序中存在的問(wèn)題分析原因,提出完善我國(guó)立法程序民主各階段的合理化建議。 本文以此為契機(jī),綜合運(yùn)用法學(xué)、政治學(xué)和社會(huì)學(xué)等多學(xué)科知識(shí)對(duì)本課題進(jìn)行分析論證,擬采用歷史分析法對(duì)我國(guó)立法制度的形成及演變進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)的梳理,重點(diǎn)分析立法過(guò)程中的程序民主問(wèn)題;用比較分析法分析世界及我國(guó)立法程序民主的現(xiàn)狀,論證完善我國(guó)立法程序民主的問(wèn)題。本文主體部分共分四章。 另外,筆者擬采用比較分析法,比較世界主要國(guó)家立法程序,并對(duì)其程序民主性作一定的評(píng)估,并采取實(shí)證分析法,分析世界及我國(guó)立法程序民主的現(xiàn)狀,論證完善我國(guó)現(xiàn)行立法程序民主法律制度的必要性和可行性等。
[Abstract]:Legislation is a major issue related to the national economy and the people's livelihood. The success or failure of the legislation is directly related to the vital interests of the people and the great development of the country. As a political system and state form, democracy has the spiritual connotation and basic requirements for the implementation of legislative democracy, that is, legislation can only reflect the civil situation and conform to the public opinion. The legal basis and the justification premise. The legislative procedure democracy is the basic requirement and concrete embodiment of the legislative democratization. It is an important guarantee for the legislation to conform to the will and interests of the majority of the people. China has always had the tradition of "heavy entity and light procedure", and has long neglected the democracy of the legislative procedure for a long time, which has brought the socialist democratic legal system in our country. With the development of the times and the progress of the society, the democratization of legislative procedure has become an irreversible trend in the construction of democratic legal system. This paper takes this opportunity to think deeply about the new problems of legislative procedure democracy, which has both rich practice and profound theory. The main part of this paper is divided into four chapters.
The first chapter explains the general theory of democracy in legislative procedure, and clearly defines the connotation and denotation of related concepts such as legislative procedure and democracy.
The second chapter compares the main differences between China and Western countries in the democratic system of legislative procedure.
The third chapter summarizes the characteristics of China's legislative procedure, and puts forward the problems and reflection in China's democratic legislative process.
The fourth chapter analyzes the causes of the problems existing in the democratic legislative procedure of China, and puts forward the rationalization proposals for improving the Democratic stage of our legislative procedure.
Taking this opportunity as a turning point, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis and demonstration of the subject by using the multi-disciplinary knowledge of law, politics and sociology. It intends to systematically comb the formation and evolution of the legislative system in China by historical analysis, analyzes the procedural democracy in the legislative process, and analyses the people of the world and the legislative procedure of our country by comparative analysis. The present situation of the Lord demonstrates the perfection of democracy in our legislative procedure. The main body of this article is divided into four chapters.
In addition, the author uses comparative analysis method to compare the legislative procedures of the major countries in the world, make a certain assessment of its procedural democracy, and take an empirical analysis to analyze the status of democracy in the legislative procedure of the world and our country, and demonstrate the necessity and feasibility of perfecting the democratic legal system of the current legislative procedure in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 汪全勝;試論構(gòu)建我國(guó)的立法準(zhǔn)備制度[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期

2 孫潮,林彥;從簡(jiǎn)單同意到有效表達(dá)——提高人大立法質(zhì)量芻議[J];法學(xué);2003年04期

3 朱應(yīng)平;改進(jìn)中共中央修憲工作的幾點(diǎn)建議[J];法學(xué);1997年12期

4 陳伯禮;;立法民主:概念與根據(jù)[J];河北法學(xué);2006年01期

5 尹中卿;完善全國(guó)人大及其常委會(huì)立法程序的若干建議[J];人大研究;2000年04期



本文編號(hào):2100033

資料下載
論文發(fā)表

本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2100033.html


Copyright(c)文論論文網(wǎng)All Rights Reserved | 網(wǎng)站地圖 |

版權(quán)申明:資料由用戶(hù)173e0***提供,本站僅收錄摘要或目錄,作者需要?jiǎng)h除請(qǐng)E-mail郵箱bigeng88@qq.com