本文選題：馬克思 + 法哲學(xué)　； 參考：《四川師范大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 近代法哲學(xué)在市民社會(huì)(civil society)和政治解放(political emancipation)的范圍內(nèi)來建構(gòu)自由、平等等法權(quán)體系(system of rights),離開法的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ),在現(xiàn)實(shí)的經(jīng)濟(jì)基礎(chǔ)和社會(huì)關(guān)系之外,抽象地探討法權(quán)問題,從而陷入法的形而上學(xué),因而,近代法哲學(xué)本質(zhì)上是一種法的形而上學(xué)。馬克思以社會(huì)存在理論為根據(jù),對(duì)近代法哲學(xué)展開了批判,徹底顛覆了近代法哲學(xué),形成了馬克思主義法哲學(xué)理論。 本文將從從三個(gè)方面對(duì)馬克思主義法哲學(xué)對(duì)近代哲學(xué)的顛覆進(jìn)行探討和研究。第一,法哲學(xué)概念的解讀。首先,介紹了法哲學(xué)一詞的傳播過程;其次,通過黑格爾、德爾?韋基奧、拉德勃魯赫、阿圖爾·考夫曼、博登海默、公丕祥、沈宗靈和葛洪義等給予法哲學(xué)的定義分析,明確界定了法哲學(xué)的概念,分析清楚了法哲學(xué)和法理學(xué)的區(qū)別;第二,近代法哲學(xué)的產(chǎn)生和發(fā)展。首先,闡述了近代法哲學(xué)興起的原因,即古代和中世紀(jì)自然法哲學(xué)提供了思想養(yǎng)料以及當(dāng)時(shí)的歷史和文化條件的作用。其次,系統(tǒng)介紹和評(píng)價(jià)了格老秀斯、霍布斯、洛克、孟德斯鳩、盧梭等人的古典自然法哲學(xué)理論以及康德、黑格爾等人的德國古典法哲學(xué)思想,這為論述馬克思的法哲學(xué)革命做了鋪墊;第三,法哲學(xué)的偉大變革——馬克思的法哲學(xué)革命。首先,闡述了馬克思主義法哲學(xué)理論的形成過程,即馬克思早期的法哲學(xué)觀、唯物主義法哲學(xué)觀的初步確立、馬克思主義法哲學(xué)的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展、馬克思主義法哲學(xué)的最終形成;其次,論述了馬克思主義法哲學(xué)對(duì)近代法哲學(xué)理論的批判,即用“社會(huì)存在決定社會(huì)意識(shí)”的原??用“市民社會(huì)是國家和法的基礎(chǔ)”的原則以及用社會(huì)存在理論所包含的歷史原則對(duì)近代法哲學(xué)進(jìn)行批判。最后,論述了馬克思主義法哲學(xué)批判理論的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,指出要在現(xiàn)階段的生產(chǎn)方式的基礎(chǔ)上認(rèn)識(shí)現(xiàn)代法權(quán)、現(xiàn)階段要承認(rèn)現(xiàn)代法權(quán)的價(jià)值,但不能照搬西方的模式以及要建立各種法權(quán)形式,并大力發(fā)展生產(chǎn)力。
[Abstract]:Modern philosophy of law constructs the system of freedom and equality within the framework of civil society (civil society) and political participation (political emancipation). It leaves the realistic foundation of law and discusses the issue of legal right in an abstract way, in addition to the real economic basis and social relations. Therefore, modern philosophy of law is essentially a metaphysics of law. Based on the theory of social existence, Marx criticized modern philosophy of law, completely subverted modern philosophy of law, and formed Marxist theory of philosophy of law. This paper probes into the subversion of Marxist philosophy of law to modern philosophy from three aspects. First, the interpretation of the concept of philosophy of law. First, it introduces the spreading process of the word philosophy of law, secondly, through Hegel, Del? The definition and analysis of legal philosophy given by Vecchio, Radbrah, Artur Kaufman, Bodenheimer, Gong Pixiang, Shen Zongling and GE Hongyi clearly define the concept of philosophy of law and clarify the difference between philosophy of law and jurisprudence; second, The emergence and development of modern philosophy of law. First of all, it expounds the reason of the rise of modern philosophy of law, that is, the ancient and medieval philosophy of natural law provided the thought nourishment and the function of the historical and cultural conditions at that time. Secondly, it systematically introduces and evaluates the classical theories of natural law philosophy of Glorius, Hobbes, Locke, Montesquieu, Rousseau and Kant, Hegel, etc. This paves the way for discussing Marx's revolution of philosophy of law; third, the great revolution of philosophy of law-Marx's revolution of philosophy of law. First of all, it expounds the forming process of Marxist legal philosophy theory, that is, the initial establishment of Marx's early legal philosophy, the preliminary establishment of materialist legal philosophy, the further development of Marxist legal philosophy, and the final formation of Marxist legal philosophy. Secondly, it discusses the criticism of Marxist philosophy of law to the modern theory of philosophy of law, that is, "the social existence determines the social consciousness". The modern philosophy of law is criticized by the principle that civil society is the foundation of state and law and the historical principle contained in the theory of social existence. Finally, it discusses the realistic significance of Marxist critical theory of legal philosophy, points out that we should recognize the value of modern legal right on the basis of the present mode of production. However, we should not copy the western model and establish various forms of legal power and vigorously develop productive forces.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：四川師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 葛洪義;法理學(xué)的定義與意義[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

2 張學(xué)志;馬克思法哲學(xué)觀的形成——《黑格爾法哲學(xué)批判》與《巴黎手稿》[J];四川師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

3 劉麗,劉曉麗;馬克思早期法哲學(xué)思想綜述[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2004年01期

4 張文顯 ,馬新福;馬克思主義法律觀的幾個(gè)問題[J];吉林大學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1992年04期

5 張瑞生;建立馬克思主義法哲學(xué)芻議[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;1988年07期

6 公丕祥;科學(xué)法哲學(xué)觀的理論形態(tài)——學(xué)習(xí)《德意志意識(shí)形態(tài)》[J];南京師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1985年04期

7 文正邦;應(yīng)該開展馬克思主義法哲學(xué)的研究[J];四川大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);1981年01期

8 公丕祥;試論青年馬克思對(duì)于法哲學(xué)的探索[J];社會(huì)科學(xué);1983年10期

9 劉日明;;當(dāng)代境域中的馬克思法哲學(xué)理論[J];同濟(jì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年02期

10 穆美瓊,張思明;試論《共產(chǎn)黨宣言》中馬克思主義的法哲學(xué)觀[J];云南師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年03期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 胡錦濤;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1969348