本文選題：調(diào)解 + 強(qiáng)制調(diào)解�。� 參考：《上海交通大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 在當(dāng)代,隨著社會(huì)主體在價(jià)值觀和文化傳統(tǒng)及利益沖突上的多元化,多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制的建立已經(jīng)成為一個(gè)世界性的課題。各國(guó)通常把法院以外的各種非訴訟糾紛解決方式統(tǒng)稱為替代性糾紛解決方式(ADR)。調(diào)解作為ADR的一種主要形式,與審判一起構(gòu)成中國(guó)的兩種主要糾紛解決機(jī)制。然而近年來,隨著市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)的活躍與發(fā)展,調(diào)解制度也暴露出諸多弊端。而西方國(guó)家如英國(guó)、加拿大、澳大利亞的調(diào)解制度發(fā)展比較成熟,對(duì)于我國(guó)有極其重要的借鑒意義。結(jié)合我國(guó)的法律文化傳統(tǒng)和調(diào)解發(fā)展趨勢(shì),科學(xué)的吸收其他國(guó)家調(diào)解制度的合理因素,并在此基礎(chǔ)上形成具有中國(guó)特色的調(diào)解制度。 全文共分為三章: 第一章簡(jiǎn)述英聯(lián)邦國(guó)家中的英國(guó)、加拿大和澳大利亞這三國(guó)的調(diào)解制度。 第二章從三個(gè)方面對(duì)這三個(gè)國(guó)家的調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行比較。 第三章對(duì)我國(guó)調(diào)解制度的發(fā)展歷史作了簡(jiǎn)要的概述,以及當(dāng)今存在的問題,著重闡述了英聯(lián)邦國(guó)家調(diào)解制度對(duì)我國(guó)的啟示。
[Abstract]:Nowadays, with the diversity of social subjects in values, cultural traditions and conflicts of interest, the establishment of pluralistic dispute resolution mechanism has become a worldwide issue. Countries usually refer to all kinds of non-litigation dispute settlement outside the court as alternative dispute resolution. Mediation, as a main form of ADR, together with trial, constitutes two major dispute resolution mechanisms in China. However, in recent years, with the active and development of market economy, mediation system also exposed many drawbacks. Western countries, such as Britain, Canada, Australia, the development of mediation system is relatively mature, for our country has an extremely important reference. Combined with the tradition of legal culture and the development trend of mediation in our country, the reasonable factors of mediation system in other countries are absorbed scientifically, and on this basis, the mediation system with Chinese characteristics is formed. The full text is divided into three chapters: The first chapter briefly describes the British, Canadian and Australian mediation systems in the Commonwealth countries. Chapter two compares the mediation system of these three countries from three aspects. The third chapter gives a brief overview of the history of China's mediation system, as well as the existing problems, focusing on the Commonwealth countries mediation system for China's inspiration.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D956.1;D915.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前7條

1 王福華;;現(xiàn)代調(diào)解制度若干問題研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2009年06期

2 周永坤;;論強(qiáng)制性調(diào)解對(duì)法治和公平的沖擊[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年03期

3 章武生;司法ADR之研究[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年02期

4 張軍奎,蔡從燕;英美ADR實(shí)踐及其對(duì)我國(guó)解決企業(yè)糾紛的啟示[J];寧夏大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

5 范愉;調(diào)解的重構(gòu)(上)——以法院調(diào)解的改革為重點(diǎn)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2004年02期

6 范愉;當(dāng)代中國(guó)非訴訟糾紛解決機(jī)制的完善與發(fā)展[J];學(xué)海;2003年01期

7 張敏,趙元勤;對(duì)英美ADR實(shí)踐的法哲學(xué)思考[J];法治論叢;2003年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1940365