本文選題：跨境破產(chǎn) + 管轄權(quán)沖突��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 目前國(guó)際上尚無處理跨境破產(chǎn)的法律框架,而跨境破產(chǎn)又通常涉及一國(guó)的基本法律原則和重大經(jīng)濟(jì)利益,因此,在這一領(lǐng)域,法律沖突特別突出。隨著我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)日益融入世界經(jīng)濟(jì),不可避免地面臨越來越多的跨境破產(chǎn)案件,受到的影響也不斷增大。但是,我國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)法學(xué)界對(duì)跨境破產(chǎn)法律制度的研究起步較晚,研究成果大多集中于跨境破產(chǎn)的域外效力和法律適用,較少觸及管轄權(quán)方面,現(xiàn)行立法對(duì)此規(guī)定也不盡完善,司法實(shí)踐面臨許多困難。然而,管轄權(quán)在跨境破產(chǎn)中處于十分特殊的地位,管轄權(quán)的確定往往決定了準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的適用,將對(duì)案件當(dāng)事人的實(shí)體權(quán)利產(chǎn)生直接影響,并且關(guān)系到判決的承認(rèn)和執(zhí)行。為此,各國(guó)對(duì)跨境破產(chǎn)案件管轄權(quán)的爭(zhēng)奪格外激烈,并試圖適用不同的管轄權(quán)確定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)來擴(kuò)張本國(guó)的管轄權(quán)。所以,本文擬對(duì)跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突問題進(jìn)行深入分析,并積極尋求合理的協(xié)調(diào)方式。 正文共分為三章: 第一章對(duì)跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的基本問題進(jìn)行概述。首先,從跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)的概念和特點(diǎn)入手,說明其在跨境破產(chǎn)中的重要性。其次,詳細(xì)評(píng)析了各種跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)確定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的實(shí)際適用情況,并在此基礎(chǔ)上,揭示了跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的現(xiàn)實(shí)性和形成原因。 第二章重點(diǎn)研究跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的協(xié)調(diào)問題。首先,闡述了協(xié)調(diào)跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的兩個(gè)原則:利益平衡和國(guó)際合作。其次,探討了協(xié)調(diào)與緩解跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的三種主要途徑。最后,對(duì)以美國(guó)《破產(chǎn)法》、《歐盟破產(chǎn)程序規(guī)則》和聯(lián)合國(guó)《跨境破產(chǎn)示范法》為代表的跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的協(xié)調(diào)模式進(jìn)行了具體分析。 第三章是關(guān)于我國(guó)協(xié)調(diào)跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的思考。在分析我國(guó)協(xié)調(diào)跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)沖突的立法現(xiàn)狀和司法實(shí)踐的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合其他國(guó)家或國(guó)際組織的有益經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出相關(guān)的立法建議。
[Abstract]:At present, there is no legal framework to deal with cross-border bankruptcy in the world, and cross-border bankruptcy usually involves the basic legal principles and major economic interests of a country. Therefore, conflicts of laws are particularly prominent in this field. As China's economy is increasingly integrated into the world economy, it inevitably faces more and more cross-border bankruptcy cases, and the impact is increasing. However, the research on cross-border bankruptcy legal system in domestic legal circles started relatively late. Most of the research results focused on the extraterritorial effects and legal application of cross-border bankruptcy, less touched on jurisdiction, and the current legislation is not perfect. Judicial practice faces many difficulties. However, jurisdiction is in a very special position in cross-border bankruptcy. The determination of jurisdiction often determines the application of applicable law, which will have a direct impact on the substantive rights of the parties to the case, and it is also related to the recognition and enforcement of judgments. Therefore, the competition for jurisdiction over cross-border bankruptcy cases is particularly fierce, and attempts to apply different jurisdiction determination criteria to expand their jurisdiction. Therefore, this paper intends to analyze the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction, and actively seek a reasonable way of coordination. The text is divided into three chapters: The first chapter summarizes the basic problems of the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction. First of all, from the concept and characteristics of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction, explains its importance in cross-border bankruptcy. Secondly, the paper makes a detailed analysis of the practical application of various cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction determination criteria, and on this basis, reveals the reality of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction conflict and the reasons for its formation. The second chapter focuses on the coordination of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction conflicts. Firstly, two principles to coordinate the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction are expounded: balance of interests and international cooperation. Secondly, three main ways to coordinate and mitigate the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction are discussed. Finally, the coordination model of the conflict of jurisdiction in cross-border insolvency, represented by the bankruptcy Law of the United States, the rules of bankruptcy procedure of the European Union and the United Nations Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, is analyzed in detail. The third chapter is about the coordination of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction conflicts in China. On the basis of analyzing the current situation of legislation and judicial practice of coordinating the conflict of cross-border bankruptcy jurisdiction in our country, and combining the beneficial experience of other countries or international organizations, this paper puts forward some relevant legislative suggestions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D99;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前6條

1 王淑敏,王秀芬;論國(guó)際民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)的消極沖突[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2004年06期

2 丁偉;我國(guó)對(duì)涉外民商事案件實(shí)行集中管轄的利弊分析——評(píng)《最高人民法院關(guān)于涉外民商事訴訟管轄權(quán)若干問題的規(guī)定》[J];法學(xué);2003年08期

3 孫輝;;芻議跨境破產(chǎn)管轄權(quán)的適用問題[J];法制與社會(huì);2007年12期

4 樊茂勇,楊彩霞;試析美國(guó)國(guó)際私法管轄權(quán)中的法經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)問題[J];山西師大學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年04期

5 石靜遐;中國(guó)的跨界破產(chǎn)法:現(xiàn)狀、問題及發(fā)展[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2002年01期

6 張莉;我國(guó)涉外民事訴訟管轄權(quán)若干問題評(píng)析[J];漳州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2001年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 王佐發(fā);跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)的法律沖突與法律適用[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2004年

2 賈申;跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)國(guó)際私法問題探究[D];清華大學(xué);2005年

3 陳亦聰;跨界破產(chǎn)之主從程序模式評(píng)議[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

4 羅驍;論跨國(guó)破產(chǎn)法律問題研究視角之轉(zhuǎn)變[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號(hào)：1916339