本文選題：海珠橋事件 + 故意傷害　； 參考：《蘭州大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 2009年上半年,廣州市的海珠橋幾乎成了跳橋“勝地”。從4月1日到5月21日50天內(nèi),同一座橋上竟上演了12起“跳橋秀”。2009年5月21日早上陳富超爬上海珠橋,開始為自己討薪。消防,交警迅速趕往現(xiàn)場。交警對海珠橋?qū)嵤┝穗p向的交通封閉。消防的談判人員開始與陳富超對話,商討解決的方式。由于沒有滿足陳富超的要求,交通被迫堵塞了5個小時。這時61歲的賴健生老人爬上大橋,將陳富超推下,造成跳橋者摔倒在消防氣墊上,沒有生命危險,但腰椎骨折和右肱骨髁上粉碎性骨折。作為一個極為特殊的個案,老伯的果斷出手,引發(fā)了兩極反應,有人贊老伯“做得好”,也有人認為老伯簡直是謀殺。跳橋者原本無意輕生,卻搞到受傷,并且廣州警方以涉嫌聚眾擾亂公共秩序罪對跳橋者陳富超刑事拘留。而賴健生為與自己毫不相干的事情出手,雖然解決了暫時的交通問題,但可能負上法律責任。此事件引來了社會的廣泛關注,報紙、網(wǎng)絡和電視節(jié)目紛紛報道此事,并且進行深入分析和探討,有關專家學者以及法律界人事也提出自己的觀點。 本文共分個三部分。第一部分是問題的提出,即廣州海珠橋推人事件的過程及對此事件的主要爭論。第二部分是對推人事件相關問題的法理分析。這一部分又分為三個部分：對賴某推人行為的法律定性。賴某的行為是否涉嫌犯罪,是否構成見義勇為；陳富超跳橋討薪的行為是否涉嫌聚眾擾亂公共場所秩序罪,以及如何對陳富超處罰的問題；關于跳橋秀維權及其原因的深層思考。第三部分,問題的解決。通過法理的分析,對推人事件中的賴某和陳富超行為進行法律定性。要遏制跳橋秀需要完善相應的信訪制度。從這次事件中,我們發(fā)現(xiàn)需要完善見義勇為的法律制度。通過對見義勇為立法的分析與研究,筆者認為社會需要的不是專門立法,而是采取其他的方式來保護見義勇為。第一,加強與完善見義勇為相關的獎勵與保障制度。第二,呼吁社會各界支持見義勇為基金會,完善見義勇為的民事救濟制度。第三,地方政府加快對見義勇為的立法與編纂。第四,政府加強自身能力建設,加強對見義勇為者的保護。
[Abstract]:In the first half of 2009, Guangzhou's Haizhu Bridge almost became a bridge jumping "resort." From April 1 to May 21, there were 12 "bridge jumping shows" on the same bridge. On the morning of May 21, 2009, Chen Fuchao climbed onto the Haizhu Bridge and began to ask for pay for himself. Fire, traffic police rushed to the scene. Traffic police imposed a two-way traffic closure on Haizhu Bridge. Fire-fighting negotiators began a dialogue with Chen Fuchao to discuss a solution. Without meeting Chen Fuchao's requirements, traffic was forced to jam for five hours. Lai Jiansheng, 61, climbed onto the bridge and pushed Chen Fuchao down, causing the jumper to fall on a fire cushion without life threatening, but a lumbar fracture and a comminuted right humeral supracondylar fracture. As a very special case, the old man's decisive action triggered a bipolar reaction, some people praised the old man "well done", others thought the old man was murder. The hopper had no intention of killing himself, but was injured, and Guangzhou police detained Chen Fuchao on suspicion of gathering a crowd to disrupt public order. Lai Jiansheng for his own nothing to do, although the solution to the temporary traffic problems, but may bear legal responsibility. This incident attracted wide attention of the society. Newspapers, networks and television programs reported the matter one after another, and carried out in-depth analysis and discussion. Relevant experts and scholars as well as personnel in the legal profession also put forward their own views. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the raising of the question, that is, the process of pushing people in Guangzhou Haizhu Bridge and the main controversy about it. The second part is the legal analysis of the problems related to the push event. This part is divided into three parts: the legal characterization of Lai's human behavior. Whether Lai's behavior is suspected of crime, whether it constitutes a brave act, whether Chen Fuchao's behavior of jumping over a bridge and asking for pay is suspected of the crime of gathering a crowd to disturb the public order, and how to punish Chen Fuchao; Deep thinking about the rights of jumping bridge and its causes. The third part, the solution of the problem. Through the analysis of legal theory, the legal characterization of the behavior of Lai and Chen Fuchao is carried out. In order to curb the jump bridge show, we need to improve the corresponding letter and visit system. From this incident, we found that we need to improve the legal system of righteous courage. Through the analysis and research on the legislation of righteous courage, the author thinks that what society needs is not special legislation, but other ways to protect it. First, strengthen and perfect the reward and safeguard system related to brave act of justice. Second, call on all sectors of the community to support the foundation and improve the civil relief system. Third, local governments speed up the legislation and compilation of heroic acts of justice. Fourth, the government should strengthen its own capacity building and strengthen the protection of the righteous.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D920.5

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇如飛;;關于完善我國見義勇為立法的思考[J];成都大學學報(社會科學版);2007年05期

2 陳航;;刑法思維的屬性研究[J];法商研究;2007年06期

3 陳興良;論犯罪構成要件的位階關系[J];法學;2005年04期

4 張晨悅;;“見義勇為”也需理性思考[J];法治論壇;2008年03期

5 關建華;;從典型個案看聚眾擾亂公共秩序犯罪的司法處置原則[J];法治論壇;2009年04期

6 徐斌;韓光;李閣;;見義勇為的行為保障思考[J];法制與社會;2008年01期

7 盧士強;;刑事責任能力與犯罪主體[J];法制與社會;2009年05期

8 邢捷;見義勇為立法問題探討[J];公安研究;1999年03期

9 蘇哲;過失致人重傷罪[J];江蘇公安�？茖W校學報;1999年03期

10 謝雄偉;周偉;;避險過當若干問題探討[J];廣州大學學報(社會科學版);2007年05期

，

本文編號：1815384