本文選題：實(shí)證主義法學(xué)　切入點(diǎn)：惡法亦法　出處：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 本文主要研究實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的“法的概念”的相關(guān)問題。本文首先闡明了實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的理論基礎(chǔ)、基本立場(chǎng)、新舊實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的區(qū)別、實(shí)證主義法學(xué)對(duì)其它法學(xué)研究方法的影響等。其次闡述了奧斯丁的法律命令說(shuō)、哈特的新分析法學(xué)和法律規(guī)則理論、拉茲的新分析法學(xué)等。再次,在實(shí)證主義法律概念觀的核心問題——惡法亦法的問題上,本文首先介紹了該觀點(diǎn)的形成和發(fā)展,隨后從辨證分析的角度,既肯定了該觀點(diǎn)的合理性,又指出了該觀點(diǎn)的局限性。最后,本文在指出實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的唯心主義本質(zhì)的同時(shí)又充分肯定了它對(duì)我國(guó)法律理論和實(shí)踐的重大借鑒意義。
[Abstract]:This paper mainly studies the concept of law in positivist jurisprudence.This paper first expounds the theoretical basis of positivism law, its basic position, the difference between the new and old positivism jurisprudence, and the influence of positivism law on other legal research methods.Secondly, the author expounds Austen's law order, Hart's new analytical law and law rule theory, Raz's new analytical law and so on.Thirdly, on the core problem of the concept of positivism, that is, draconian law and law, this paper first introduces the formation and development of this viewpoint, and then confirms the rationality of the viewpoint from the angle of dialectical analysis.The limitations of this viewpoint are also pointed out.Finally, this paper points out the idealism essence of positivism law and fully affirms its great significance for reference to our country's legal theory and practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 朱峰;;法律實(shí)證主義的命題研究[J];法學(xué)論壇;2006年06期

2 喻中;;七旬圣賢的境遇:自由的孔子與不自由的蘇格拉底[J];政法論壇;2006年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1689546