本文關(guān)鍵詞： 替代性糾紛解決方式 ADR 環(huán)境行政糾紛 合意理念　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 替代性糾紛解決方式(Alternative Dispute Resolution,以下簡稱ADR)在行政法領(lǐng)域的應(yīng)用是近年來美國行政法領(lǐng)域的重要變革,其間涉及到很多重要的行政法問題。但目前國內(nèi)學(xué)者對這個(gè)問題的研究并不多。本文選擇對這一重要過程中的一個(gè)側(cè)面——環(huán)境行政糾紛解決領(lǐng)域ADR的應(yīng)用進(jìn)行論述,并不奢望能夠窺一斑而知全豹,而是期望能夠借此對一些相關(guān)的問題進(jìn)行探討,并為我國相關(guān)領(lǐng)域的立法和實(shí)踐提供一些可供參考的資料。 本文的結(jié)構(gòu)如下: 引言部分主要介紹文章的選題并對主要參考資料進(jìn)行綜述。在這一部分,本文首先介紹了ADR在世界范圍內(nèi)的影響和德國學(xué)者對這一制度的探討,從而引出我國大陸學(xué)者對這一問題的研究現(xiàn)狀。之后,本文對美國的相關(guān)探討進(jìn)行了綜述。 第一章主要論述美國環(huán)境行政糾紛的傳統(tǒng)解決方式及其弊端和環(huán)境ADR的興起。在這一部分,本文首先對美國的環(huán)境行政體系進(jìn)行了介紹,闡明了美國承擔(dān)環(huán)境管制職能的行政機(jī)關(guān)及其具體權(quán)限;接下來本文介紹1986年以前美國環(huán)境行政糾紛傳統(tǒng)解決方式的諸多弊端。最后,對ADR被引入環(huán)境行政糾紛解決領(lǐng)域的背景和過程作了一番梳理。 第二章主要論述了美國聯(lián)邦環(huán)保局在環(huán)境行政糾紛解決領(lǐng)域適用ADR的制度與實(shí)踐。在這一部分,首先介紹了美國聯(lián)邦環(huán)保局適用ADR的內(nèi)部機(jī)構(gòu)、范圍和具體程序,接著又對美國聯(lián)邦環(huán)保局適用ADR的五種具體技術(shù):調(diào)解、仲裁、事實(shí)認(rèn)定、小型審判及和解進(jìn)行了較為全面的介紹。 第三章對美國環(huán)境行政糾紛解決領(lǐng)域適用ADR的經(jīng)驗(yàn)進(jìn)行了總結(jié)并予以反思。在這一部分,本文首先探討了最初作為民事糾紛解決方法的ADR適用于行政糾紛解決領(lǐng)域的妥當(dāng)性,并探討美國聯(lián)邦環(huán)保局是通過何種手段保證ADR有效實(shí)施的。接下來本文對我國環(huán)境行政糾紛解決方式進(jìn)行了反思。 在余論中,本文對合意理念在我國行政法領(lǐng)域展開的背景及邊界進(jìn)行了初步的探討。 接下來的結(jié)論部分對全文的觀點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了總結(jié)。
[Abstract]:The application of alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in the field of administrative law is an important change in the field of American administrative law in recent years. There are a lot of important administrative law problems involved, but at present, there are not many researches on this issue by domestic scholars. This paper chooses to discuss the application of ADR in the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution, which is one of the important aspects of this important process. It is not extravagant to be able to peek at the whole leopard, but expect to discuss some related problems, and provide some reference materials for the legislation and practice of related fields in our country. The structure of this paper is as follows:. In this part, we first introduce the influence of ADR in the world and the discussion of this system by German scholars. The present situation of the research on this problem is brought forward. Then, the related research of the United States is summarized in this paper. The first chapter mainly discusses the traditional methods and disadvantages of environmental administrative disputes in the United States and the rise of environmental ADR. In this part, this paper first introduces the environmental administrative system of the United States. This paper expounds the administrative organs and their specific competence of environmental regulation in the United States. Then, this paper introduces the disadvantages of traditional solutions to environmental administrative disputes in the United States before 1986. Finally, The background and process of ADR being introduced into the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution are combed. The second chapter mainly discusses the system and practice of applying ADR in the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution. In this part, the author first introduces the internal organization, scope and specific procedure of ADR application by USEPA. Then it gives a comprehensive introduction to the five specific techniques that the Federal Environmental Protection Agency applies to ADR: mediation, arbitration, fact finding, small trial and settlement. The third chapter summarizes and reflects on the experience of applying ADR in the field of environmental administrative dispute resolution in the United States. In this part, this paper first discusses the appropriateness of ADR, which was originally used as a civil dispute resolution method, in the field of administrative dispute resolution. This paper also discusses the means by which the Federal Environmental Protection Agency ensures the effective implementation of ADR. Next, this paper reflects on the ways to resolve environmental administrative disputes in China. In the conclusion, this paper discusses the background and boundary of the idea of agreement in the field of administrative law in China. The following part of the conclusion of the full text of the point of view is summarized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：DD915.4;D971.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙勇,周柯利;私法理念與行政法的契合[J];太原師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

2 田紅星;試論契約在環(huán)境行政中的引入[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2005年06期

3 溫輝;;論行政訴訟和解的法理基礎(chǔ)[J];法律適用;2009年02期

4 王錫鋅;規(guī)則、合意與治理——行政過程中ADR適用的可能性與妥當(dāng)性研究[J];法商研究;2003年05期

5 胡建淼,蔣紅珍;論合意理念在行政領(lǐng)域中的滲透——基礎(chǔ)、表現(xiàn)及其支撐系統(tǒng)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2004年04期

6 余凌云;;論行政法領(lǐng)域中存在契約關(guān)系的可能性[J];法學(xué)家;1998年02期

7 楊解君;論行政法理念的塑造——契約理念與權(quán)力理念的整合[J];法學(xué)評論;2003年01期

8 張梓太;中國環(huán)境行政訴訟之困境與對策分析[J];法學(xué)評論;2003年05期

9 楊解君;契約文化的變遷及其啟示(上)——契約理念在公法中的確立[J];法學(xué)評論;2004年06期

10 楊解君;契約文化的變遷及其啟示(下)——契約理念在公法中的確立[J];法學(xué)評論;2005年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 李廣宇;[N];人民法院報(bào);2008年

，

本文編號：1497735