本文關(guān)鍵詞：危難救助者法律救濟(jì)制度研究　出處：《西北大學(xué)》2009年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 見義勇為 危難救助行為 無因管理 行政協(xié)助行為 法律救濟(jì)

【摘要】： 筆者擬用規(guī)范的法律用語——“危難救助行為”來替代目前法學(xué)界廣泛討論的“見義勇為行為”,以區(qū)分于道德規(guī)范中的“見義勇為行為”,避免僅對“見義勇為行為”做道德評價(jià)和精神褒揚(yáng),而物質(zhì)救濟(jì)不足,實(shí)現(xiàn)法律對“危難救助行為”的規(guī)范、調(diào)整和保護(hù),從而為危難救助者提供有效的救濟(jì)途徑,更好地保障其合法權(quán)益。除引言外,全文共分為三部分: 第一部分,討論了道德層面上的見義勇為行為和法律層面上的危難救助行為,并在理論上對兩者進(jìn)行區(qū)分。同時(shí),具體分析了危難救助行為的四個(gè)構(gòu)成要件,即危險(xiǎn)正在發(fā)生,具有緊急性;無法定或約定的義務(wù);行為人具有利他性意圖;行為人須為具有一定意思能力的自然人;存在合法救助行為。 第二部分,分私法、公法和社會(huì)法三個(gè)層次介紹了危難救助者法律救濟(jì)制度的現(xiàn)狀,并相應(yīng)地分析了它們在彌補(bǔ)救助者損失方面的不足。 第三部分是關(guān)于危難救助者法律救濟(jì)制度的重構(gòu),包括私法救濟(jì)、公法救濟(jì)和社會(huì)法救濟(jì)三個(gè)方面�；谖ｋy救助行為的防止侵害性和無因管理性,危難救助者可以依據(jù)相關(guān)民法制度獲得損害賠償或補(bǔ)償;基于危難救助行為的行政協(xié)助性,危難救助者可以依據(jù)行政法上的相關(guān)規(guī)定獲得國家補(bǔ)償和國家獎(jiǎng)勵(lì);此外,基于社會(huì)法原理,危難救助者還可依據(jù)相關(guān)社會(huì)法規(guī)定獲得醫(yī)療救助和社會(huì)優(yōu)撫。其中,私法救濟(jì)是第一位的,當(dāng)危難救助者的損失通過私法途徑不能獲得全部賠償或補(bǔ)償時(shí),先由醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)對救助者進(jìn)行醫(yī)療救助,再由國家對救助者進(jìn)行補(bǔ)償和獎(jiǎng)勵(lì)。國家補(bǔ)償是危難救助者法律救濟(jì)的最后保障。
[Abstract]:The author intends to replace the "act of righteous courage", which is widely discussed in the field of law at present, with the normative legal term "the act of rescue in distress", in order to distinguish it from the "act of courage of righteousness" in moral norms. Avoid only doing moral evaluation and spiritual praise to "act of righteous courage", but the material relief is insufficient, realize the regulation, adjustment and protection of the law to "the behavior of rescue in distress". In order to provide an effective remedy for the rescue victims, better protect their legitimate rights and interests. In addition to the introduction, the full text is divided into three parts: The first part discusses the moral level of the act of righteous action and the legal level of rescue behavior, and in theory to distinguish the two. At the same time, the specific analysis of the four constitutive elements of the act of rescue in distress. That is, the danger is happening, and it is urgent; An obligation that cannot be established or agreed upon; The actor has altruistic intention; The perpetrator must be a natural person with a certain capacity of interest; There is a lawful act of rescue. In the second part, the author introduces the current situation of the legal relief system for rescuers in three levels: private law, public law and social law, and analyzes their deficiencies in making up for the loss of rescuers. The third part is about the reconstruction of the legal relief system, including private law relief, public law relief and social law relief. A person who is in distress may receive compensation or compensation for damages in accordance with the relevant civil law system; Based on the nature of administrative assistance in the rescue of distress, the rescuer may be compensated and rewarded by the state according to the relevant provisions of the administrative law. In addition, based on the principle of social law, people in distress can also obtain medical assistance and social benefits according to the relevant social law. Among them, private law relief is the first. When the loss of the rescuer can not get all the compensation or compensation through private law, the medical institution first carries on the medical aid to the rescuer. The state compensates and rewards the rescuers.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D90-053

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 湯艷;;救助者權(quán)益保護(hù)的研究現(xiàn)狀評析[J];四川理工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2013年02期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳清;侵權(quán)法上救助義務(wù)研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 郭娟;關(guān)于設(shè)立“見危不救罪”的探討[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

2 林洋;見義勇為者權(quán)益保障研究[D];廣西師范大學(xué);2010年

3 胡亞;論我國對己無害危難救助義務(wù)的法律化[D];華僑大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1429629