本文關(guān)鍵詞：無侵權(quán)人見義勇為補(bǔ)償糾紛案評(píng)析　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 見義勇為 無因管理 法律適用 補(bǔ)償責(zé)任

【摘要】：隨著網(wǎng)絡(luò)和媒體的發(fā)展，越來越多的關(guān)于見義勇為者因見義勇為導(dǎo)致身體、精神和財(cái)產(chǎn)損失卻得不到救助的案件引發(fā)社會(huì)的討論和關(guān)注。在民事法律實(shí)務(wù)中，與之相關(guān)的見義勇為者權(quán)益保護(hù)以及受益人補(bǔ)償責(zé)任的法律適用問題亦特別值得研究。 吳某因幫助同村居民支某救火而遭受人身損害，向人民法院起訴。在案件審理過程中，原、被告雙方在原告的行為是否構(gòu)成見義勇為行為、受益人是否應(yīng)該承擔(dān)補(bǔ)償責(zé)任以及受益人是否應(yīng)該承擔(dān)精神損害賠償?shù)囊幌盗袉栴}產(chǎn)生了很大的分歧，成為案件的爭議焦點(diǎn)。對(duì)于這一系列問題的解決，首先應(yīng)該明確見義勇為的民法定義和構(gòu)成要件，見義勇為行為是指沒有法定或約定的義務(wù),為了使國家、社會(huì)、集體的公共利益或他人的人身、財(cái)產(chǎn)等合法權(quán)益免受侵害,在緊急情況下實(shí)施的與違法犯罪行為作斗爭或救人、搶險(xiǎn)、救災(zāi)的合法行為。對(duì)于見義勇為的民法認(rèn)定不宜過嚴(yán)，符合見義勇為的構(gòu)成要件即可成立。對(duì)于受益人承擔(dān)補(bǔ)償責(zé)任的問題主要是我國民法中關(guān)于見義勇為的相關(guān)規(guī)定的法律適用問題，，我國的相關(guān)法律規(guī)定不統(tǒng)一，造成了實(shí)務(wù)中同類案件法律適用不同的問題，對(duì)于這個(gè)問題的解決，建議以無因管理為理論基礎(chǔ)，豐富《民法通則》第93條的內(nèi)容，刪除《民法通則》第109條，解決了法律適用的問題，關(guān)于受益人是否承擔(dān)精神損害賠償?shù)膯栴}也就迎刃而解了。明確見義勇為的認(rèn)定，解決無侵權(quán)人見義勇為的法律適用問題，有利于見義勇為者權(quán)益的保護(hù)，以維護(hù)社會(huì)的公平正義，倡導(dǎo)社會(huì)的道德風(fēng)尚。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the network and the media, more and more about the courageous because of the courageous cause physical, mental and property loss but not rescue cases caused social concern and discuss. In the civil law practice, the related rights protection and courageous beneficiaries compensation liability legal problems are particularly worthy of study.
Wu for help villagers the support of a fire and suffered personal injury, to the people's court. In the case of the trial, the original defendant, whether in the plaintiff's behavior constitutes a courageous behavior, a series of problems if the beneficiary should bear the compensation liability and the beneficiary should bear the compensation for mental damage caused great differences become the controversial focus of the case. To solve a series of problems, first of all should be clearly defined and courageous civil elements, courageous behavior does not refer to legal or contractual obligations, in order to make the state, society, collective public interests or the legitimate rights and interests of others, such as the implementation of property from infringement, in case of emergency fight or rescue, and criminal acts of rescue, relief the legal behavior. The courageous civil law that should not be too strict, meet the courageous. Elements can be established. The beneficiaries bear the compensation liability is the main problem of the applicable law on the relevant provisions for civil law of our country, the relevant laws and regulations in China are not unified, caused by different problems of similar cases in the practical application of the law, to solve this problem, suggestions on causelessness management theory rich, "general principles of civil law > ninety-third content, delete < > 109th of the general principles of the civil law, to solve the problem of the applicable law, the beneficiary on whether to take the mental damage compensation issues have clearly identified courageous smoothly done or easily solved. In order to solve the problem of application of law, no infringement people courageous, is conducive to the protection of the rights and interests of courageous, to safeguard social fairness and justice, promote social morality.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D923;D920.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王毓瑩,向國慧;論公平責(zé)任原則的限制適用 公平責(zé)任原則的公平危機(jī)及其防范[J];法律適用;2004年09期

2 李玉敏;見義勇為的性質(zhì)及救濟(jì)機(jī)制[J];法律適用;2005年10期

3 姜明安;行政補(bǔ)償制度研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2001年05期

4 尹飛;;論義務(wù)幫工責(zé)任的獨(dú)立地位[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

5 張素鳳;趙琰琳;;見義勇為的認(rèn)定與保障機(jī)制[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年03期

6 曾博;;見義勇為的法律界定之我見[J];法治論壇;2008年03期

7 王雷;;見義勇為行為中的民法學(xué)問題研究[J];法學(xué)家;2012年05期

8 賈邦俊;見義勇為行為的民法透視[J];河北法學(xué);2003年01期

9 徐國棟;;見義勇為立法比較研究[J];河北法學(xué);2006年07期

10 張海峽,白云飛,黃曉扣;緊急救助論——見義勇為立法的民法法理依據(jù)[J];河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2000年06期

本文編號(hào)：1410649