H死亡原因鑒定結(jié)論的證據(jù)法學(xué)分析
[Abstract]:The conclusion of the appraisal of the cause of death is of great importance to the treatment of common and multiple cases, such as intentional injury (causing death), intentional homicide and so on, that is, to find out the facts of the case, to determine the nature of the case, to apply the law correctly, to convict the crime and the non-crime, This crime and that crime are of great significance to accurate sentencing and the handling of incidental civil proceedings. This paper first introduces a case of death identification in criminal proceedings in China. After giving an account of the approach to the analysis, starting with the evidentiary ability and the power of proof of the appraisal conclusion, The main problems in the identification of the cause of death in criminal proceedings in China are analyzed in six parts as follows: the first part: the analysis of the initiation of identification. This paper points out the problems existing in the initiation of identification in our country's criminal procedure practice and the causes of the problems, and analyzes the influence of the initiation of identification on the ability of evidence and the power of proof. This paper summarizes the characteristics and shortcomings of the initiation system of criminal procedure identification in our country. The second part: the analysis of the qualification of experts. This paper probes into how the qualification of expert affects the ability of evidence and the power of proof, and points out the problems and harm of the qualification system of forensic medicine in our country. Put forward the good practice and experience of studying the forensic expert qualification system of the countries concerned. The third part: the analysis of the neutral aspect of the appraisal institution. This paper points out how the appraisal institution affects the evidential ability or the power of proof of the appraisal conclusion, probes into the relationship between the neutrality of the appraisal institution and the neutrality of the expert, and points out the present situation that the medical appraisal institution and the expert are not neutral in our country's criminal procedure law. Combined with the facts of the case, the negative impact of this non-neutrality on the forensic experts' identification activities in the public security system, and the negative influence on the proving power of the conclusion of the death appraisal are discussed. Combined with the case, the paper discusses the influence of the appraising institution attached to the court system on the evaluation of the power of proof of the appraisal conclusion, and finally introduces the good practice of the neutrality of the death appraisal institution in the criminal proceedings in the major developed countries. The fourth part: the analysis of the implementation of inspection and appraisal. In this paper, the influence of the implementation of test identification on the power of proof of death identification was discussed from the aspects of object, material and forensic examination. The fifth part: the appraisal basis, the principle follow and the demonstration aspect analysis. First of all, the paper discusses the basis of identification in the case, and the negative influence of the principle on the proof of the conclusion of the death appraisal; Then it discusses the negative influence of the analysis and argument in the appraisal book on the power of proof of the conclusion of the death appraisal and the negative influence on the result of the first instance judgment. The sixth part: the analysis of representation. This paper discusses the influence of unclear expression on the evaluation of the probative power of the conclusion of death identification. This paper focuses on how the above six problems have a negative impact on the evidential ability or probative power of the conclusion of death identification. Taking the conclusion of the Supreme Law and the result of the first instance judgment as examples, this paper deeply analyzes the profound negative effect of the conclusion of the coroner's cause of death, which has the ability of evidence but the less power of proof, on the result of substantive judgment. This paper not only reveals some problems existing in the selected cases and their causes, but also enables readers to grasp the essence of the question of the cause of death in criminal proceedings in our country, and to understand the harmfulness of the problem more clearly. In order to arouse people, especially the judicial practice and academic colleagues, to our criminal proceedings involved in the issue of death identification. With a view to promoting the solution of existing problems through the joint efforts of all parties.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2009
【分類號】:D918.9
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 張常明;;從產(chǎn)婦死亡案看司法鑒定與醫(yī)學(xué)會鑒定證明力[J];臨床誤診誤治;2006年02期
2 姜琳瑋;江濤;馮斌;;淺議鑒定結(jié)論的運(yùn)用[J];中國司法鑒定;2005年06期
3 張玉鑲;;再論刑事偵查中同一鑒定的幾個(gè)問題——兼與高進(jìn)同志商榷[J];中外法學(xué);1991年04期
4 ;司法會計(jì)鑒定結(jié)論是否需回答法律性問題?[J];人民檢察;1996年12期
5 錢磊;;醫(yī)療事故技術(shù)鑒定所涉若干法律問題的思考[J];中國衛(wèi)生法制;1997年06期
6 楊大富;刑事證據(jù)鑒定人出庭作證若干問題談[J];湖北公安高等?茖W(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);1998年01期
7 張漢昌;論我國司法鑒定人制度的改革與完善[J];江西社會科學(xué);2001年12期
8 張玉鑲;司法鑒定學(xué)基本概念研究[J];中國司法鑒定;2001年01期
9 蘇曉龍,黎峰;鑒定結(jié)論與專家證言之初步比較[J];行政與法;2003年07期
10 李文成;;對醫(yī)療事故的鑒定結(jié)論不服能否提起行政訴訟[J];健康生活;2006年04期
相關(guān)會議論文 前10條
1 楊曉娜;;傷害案件中鑒定結(jié)論存在的問題及對策[A];中國犯罪學(xué)研究會第十三屆學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2004年
2 李祖富;;淺談刑事訴訟活動中法醫(yī)鑒定應(yīng)遵循的幾條原則[A];全國第六次法醫(yī)學(xué)術(shù)交流會論文摘要集[C];2000年
3 黃穎宏;夏明天;;淺談刑事案件中法醫(yī)學(xué)鑒定體制[A];中國法醫(yī)學(xué)會全國第十次法醫(yī)臨床學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)研討會論文集[C];2007年
4 趙麗華;;醫(yī)療鑒定結(jié)論在訴訟中的效力[A];2009年浙江省醫(yī)學(xué)倫理學(xué)與衛(wèi)生法學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)年會論文匯編[C];2009年
5 李,
本文編號:2392800
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2392800.html