司法鑒定統(tǒng)一立法要論
[Abstract]:The decision on the Administration of Forensic expertise, adopted by the standing Committee of the National people's Congress in 2005, aims to eliminate the confusion and disorder in the field of judicial expertise for a long time, and to establish a unified and standardized management system of judicial expertise. Due to the lack of close connection between the rules of evidence and the current litigation system, there are no clear provisions on the allocation of the right to appraisal, the procedure for the implementation of the appraisal, the standards of various types of identification, etc. As a result, in practice, all kinds of expert agencies still go their own way and fail to achieve the purpose of the "decision". Therefore, as soon as possible, the "Forensic expertise Law" has been formulated and a whole set of scientific and reasonable judicial expertise systems have been established. It is an urgent task in the process of legalization of litigation system and judicial system in our country.
【作者單位】: 西南政法大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】:D918.9
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 郭華;;論司法鑒定統(tǒng)一管理的困境癥結(jié)及破解路向——以全國人大常委會《關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》為中心[J];中國司法;2007年03期
2 何家弘;;我國司法鑒定制度改革的基本思路[J];人民檢察;2007年05期
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 申惠文;;駁民法憲法新同位論[J];安徽大學(xué)法律評論;2008年02期
2 何承斌;;試論人權(quán)的刑法保障的若干問題[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2007年01期
3 鄭德新;“法的起源”不等于“法意識的起源”——兼論關(guān)于“法的起源”爭論的誤區(qū)[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年01期
4 周方倫;芻議法官獨(dú)立[J];安徽教育學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年02期
5 陳克軍;;合同債權(quán)性質(zhì)研究[J];安徽電子信息職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院學(xué)報;2008年03期
6 曹曉東;張清;;淺議偵查階段的司法審查制度[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2010年06期
7 郭莉;崔強(qiáng);;烏江流域農(nóng)業(yè)水權(quán)的法律保障制度研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2010年01期
8 張,
本文編號:2364969
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fanzuizhian/2364969.html