【摘要】：震驚全國的福建南平鄭民生“3·23”特大兇殺案已經(jīng)以鄭民生被執(zhí)行死刑而告結束,但圍繞著此案,又一次引發(fā)了人們對我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度的討論。人們認為一些轟動全國的有關“精神病”犯罪的重大命案中,精神病鑒定并未成為通例,而是由司法機關“酌情考慮”選擇性執(zhí)行,從中不難看出目前我國精神病司法鑒定制度還存在著諸如啟動程序不合理,鑒定人制度不合理,質證制度不完善等一系列的不科學的問題,這將直接導致刑事訴訟中控辯雙方權利失衡,影響到程序公正和實體公正,難以保障犯罪嫌疑人、被告人的合法權利。因此,本文結合鄭民生“3·23”特大兇殺案,通過對我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度現(xiàn)狀的深入考察,針對我國司法鑒定制度中存在的突出問題,在比較兩大法系國家司法鑒定制度的基礎上,吸收國外立法的有益經(jīng)驗,提出重新構建我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度的框架和思路。
[Abstract]:The "323" murder case in Nanping, Fujian Province, which shocked the whole country, has ended with the execution of the death penalty. But around this case, people have once again aroused the discussion on the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system of our country. It is believed that in some of the major deaths involving "psychotic" crimes that have caused a stir throughout the country, psychiatric identification has not become a general rule, but has been selectively carried out "as appropriate" by the judiciary. It is not difficult to see that there are still a series of unscientific problems in the current system of forensic appraisal of mental illness in our country, such as unreasonable starting procedure, unreasonable system of authenticators, imperfect system of cross-examination and so on. This will directly lead to the imbalance of the rights of the prosecution and the defense in criminal proceedings, which will affect the procedural justice and substantive justice, and it will be difficult to protect the legal rights of criminal suspects and defendants. Therefore, this article, combined with Zheng Minsheng's "323" murder case, through the in-depth investigation of the present situation of the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in China, aims at the outstanding problems existing in the judicial expertise system of our country. On the basis of comparing the judicial identification systems in the two legal system countries and absorbing the beneficial experience of foreign legislation, this paper puts forward the framework and train of thought for reconstructing the criminal judicial psychiatric appraisal system in our country.
【學位授予單位】：蘭州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D925.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前8條

1 劉方啟,陳起江,趙彩霞;中美司法精神病鑒定現(xiàn)狀比較[J];法律與醫(yī)學雜志;1999年02期

2 林美卿;;論我國司法精神病鑒定制度之完善[J];法制與社會;2007年10期

3 宋麗華;;《勞動合同法》功能分析[J];法制與社會;2007年11期

4 鄒豫莨;高野;;完善我國精神病司法鑒定制度的思考[J];法制與社會;2008年22期

5 羅小年;;司法精神病鑒定中無病推論的幾個問題[J];臨床精神醫(yī)學雜志;2005年06期

6 黃永宏;;對司法精神病鑒定工作的幾點思考[J];臨床心身疾病雜志;2008年01期

7 宮萬路;論鑒定人制度的完善[J];中國司法鑒定;2001年01期

8 劉小林,劉杰;司法精神病鑒定中不同結論的原因及對策探討[J];中華精神科雜志;2005年01期

相關重要報紙文章 前1條

1 實習生 趙天水;[N];南方周末;2010年

相關碩士學位論文 前2條

1 楊文菁;刑事司法精神病學鑒定啟動制度比較研究[D];北京大學;2008年

2 張妍霞;論我國刑事司法精神病鑒定制度的完善[D];煙臺大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2361038