發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-07-31 07:32

【摘要】：數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)是云時(shí)代大數(shù)據(jù)環(huán)境下,網(wǎng)權(quán)和主權(quán)層面的鏈接,數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)在一定程度上塑造了新的地緣政治,國(guó)家之間的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)有了新的高地,“斯諾登”事件催生了全球關(guān)注自身的網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全以及數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)。云時(shí)代一國(guó)的數(shù)據(jù)能力作為結(jié)構(gòu)性權(quán)力的維度之一,在國(guó)際競(jìng)爭(zhēng)中起著越來(lái)越凸出的作用,而數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)亦是云時(shí)代國(guó)家主權(quán)理論的新發(fā)展,和相互依賴邏輯一樣,網(wǎng)絡(luò)空間中數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)也存在著敏感性以及脆弱性。推動(dòng)中國(guó)的數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)建設(shè)有利于維護(hù)國(guó)家主權(quán)權(quán)威和合法性,有利于我國(guó)的數(shù)據(jù)自主性安全建設(shè),彌補(bǔ)安全短板推動(dòng)我國(guó)的總體安全建設(shè)。云數(shù)據(jù)技術(shù)作為一種新興的技術(shù),其本身存在著技術(shù)上的漏洞,各國(guó)關(guān)于數(shù)據(jù)法律的差異加劇了主權(quán)的風(fēng)險(xiǎn),而現(xiàn)實(shí)中的霸權(quán)國(guó)在數(shù)據(jù)領(lǐng)域的進(jìn)攻性凸顯,這點(diǎn)從“斯諾登”事件中是很明顯的體現(xiàn)出來(lái),賽博戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)已經(jīng)成為西方遏華的新手段,而我國(guó)對(duì)于自身網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全的憂患意識(shí)則有待提高。中國(guó)是一個(gè)網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)大國(guó),但是遠(yuǎn)非網(wǎng)絡(luò)強(qiáng)國(guó),中國(guó)在發(fā)展大數(shù)據(jù)技術(shù)上面臨著諸多的制約,中國(guó)作為未來(lái)世界秩序變革的領(lǐng)導(dǎo)者,在網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)上也應(yīng)當(dāng)奉行一種“增量改進(jìn)”的策略,由于數(shù)據(jù)主權(quán)和安全維護(hù)是一個(gè)涉及內(nèi)政和外交的系統(tǒng)工程,中國(guó)亦應(yīng)當(dāng)依托科技創(chuàng)新,加強(qiáng)國(guó)內(nèi)改革,鞏固自身的網(wǎng)絡(luò)數(shù)據(jù)邊防,在區(qū)域的安全合作框架內(nèi)開(kāi)展跨國(guó)性的“網(wǎng)絡(luò)安全演習(xí)”,倡導(dǎo)網(wǎng)絡(luò)裁軍,推動(dòng)全球網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理回歸到聯(lián)合國(guó)的權(quán)威上,倡導(dǎo)多邊、民主、透明的全球網(wǎng)絡(luò)治理。
[Abstract]:Data sovereignty is the link between network power and sovereignty level under the environment of big data in the cloud era. To a certain extent, data sovereignty has shaped new geopolitics, and the competition among countries has a new high ground. Snowden has spawned a global focus on its own cyber security and data sovereignty. As one of the dimensions of structural power, the data capability of a country in the cloud era plays a more and more prominent role in the international competition, and the data sovereignty is also a new development of the theory of state sovereignty in the cloud era, just like the logic of interdependence. There is also sensitivity and vulnerability to data sovereignty in cyberspace. Promoting the construction of China's data sovereignty is conducive to safeguarding the authority and legitimacy of national sovereignty, to the construction of data autonomy and security in China, and to making up for the short board of security to promote the overall security construction of our country. Cloud data technology, as a new technology, has its own technical loopholes. The differences of data laws between countries have aggravated the risk of sovereignty, while the hegemonic countries in reality are striking in the field of data. This is evident from the Snowden incident. The cyberwar has become a new means of suppressing China in the West, while our country's awareness of its own network security needs to be improved. China is a large country of network data, but far from a network power. China faces many constraints in developing big data technology. China is the leader of the future world order reform. In terms of the sovereignty over network data, we should also pursue a strategy of "incremental improvement". Since data sovereignty and security maintenance are a systematic project involving domestic and foreign affairs, China should also rely on scientific and technological innovations to strengthen domestic reform. Consolidating their own cyber-data borders, conducting transnational "cybersecurity exercises" within the framework of regional security cooperation, advocating cyberdisarmament, promoting global cybergovernance back to the authority of the United Nations, advocating multilateralism and democracy, Transparent global network governance.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：TP309;D631

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何花;;淺議貨幣主權(quán)的法律問(wèn)題[J];商;2012年13期

2 王逸舟;樹(shù)立世紀(jì)之交的新主權(quán)觀[J];w攣胖蕓，

本文編號(hào)：2154869