本文選題：刑事速裁 + 政策執(zhí)行�。� 參考：《西南交通大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：2014年6月27日,十二屆全國人大常委會第九次會議通過了《關(guān)于授權(quán)最高人民法院、最高人民檢察院在部分地區(qū)開展刑事案件速裁程序的試點(diǎn)工作的決定》(以下簡稱《決定》),在北京、天津、上海、廣州和深圳等18個(gè)案件基數(shù)大、類型多且具有典型性、代表性的地區(qū)開展刑事案件速裁程序試點(diǎn)工作。該《決定》被看作是開創(chuàng)了刑事訴訟試驗(yàn)性立法的先河。廣州市公安局發(fā)布《廣州市公安局刑事案件速裁程序試點(diǎn)工作實(shí)施方案》,意味著刑事案件速裁程序試點(diǎn)工作從2014年8月正式拉開帷幕。刑事案件速裁程序旨在解決司法資源緊缺與刑事案件數(shù)量驟增之間的矛盾,對刑事案件建立一套繁簡有別的訴訟程序,依法從快從簡辦理輕微刑事案件。公安機(jī)關(guān)偵查工作作為刑事訴訟的首要環(huán)節(jié),啟動該程序能夠有效提高訴訟效率、優(yōu)化司法資源配置,該程序執(zhí)行工作的成效事關(guān)重大,對促進(jìn)我國司法改革有著重要的意義。本文對增城區(qū)公安分局試點(diǎn)“刑事速裁”政策執(zhí)行情況開展研究,筆者作為公安機(jī)關(guān)人員,能夠迅速掌握試點(diǎn)工作的第一手資料,充分認(rèn)識該政策執(zhí)行的現(xiàn)狀,采用問卷調(diào)查法、訪談法和文獻(xiàn)研究法三種方法,以史密斯政策執(zhí)行模型為理論導(dǎo)向,從理想化的政策、執(zhí)行主體、目標(biāo)群體和環(huán)境因素四個(gè)方面,對增城區(qū)公安分局試點(diǎn)“刑事速裁”政策執(zhí)行狀況進(jìn)行了探討,發(fā)現(xiàn)執(zhí)行中遇到的困難,深度挖掘原因,并得出有利于該政策執(zhí)行的對策與建議,從全新的理論角度出發(fā),為下一步全面推廣“刑事速裁”政策執(zhí)行扎實(shí)了理論基礎(chǔ)與實(shí)踐參考。
[Abstract]:On June 27, 2014, the Ninth meeting of the standing Committee of the Twelfth National people's Congress adopted the draft on authorizing the Supreme people's Court, The decision of the Supreme people's Procuratorate to launch the pilot work of the criminal case adjudication procedure in some regions. "(hereinafter referred to as" the decision "), 18 cases in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanghai, Guangzhou and Shenzhen have a large base number, many types and are typical. The representative regions will carry out the trial work of the criminal case adjudication procedure. The decision is seen as a pioneer in the experimental legislation of criminal procedure. Guangzhou Public Security Bureau issued the "trial program of criminal cases quick adjudication procedure of Guangzhou Public Security Bureau", which meant that the trial work of criminal cases quick adjudication procedure began formally in August 2014. The criminal case adjudication procedure aims to solve the contradiction between the shortage of judicial resources and the sudden increase in the number of criminal cases, and sets up a set of complex criminal cases with other procedural procedures to deal with minor criminal cases as soon as possible according to law. The investigation of public security organs is the most important link in criminal procedure. Starting this procedure can effectively improve the efficiency of litigation and optimize the allocation of judicial resources. The effectiveness of the implementation of this procedure is of great importance, and it is of great significance to promote the judicial reform in our country. This article carries on the research to the Zengcheng District Public Security Bureau pilot "criminal quick adjudication" policy implementation situation, the author, as the public security organ personnel, can quickly grasp the pilot work first-hand information, fully understands this policy implementation present situation, Using three methods: questionnaire survey, interview and literature research, taking Smith's policy execution model as the theoretical guidance, from four aspects of idealized policy, executive subject, target group and environmental factors, This paper probes into the implementation of the policy of "criminal quick adjudication" in Zengcheng District Public Security Substation, finds out the difficulties encountered in the implementation of the policy, deeply excavates the reasons, and draws the countermeasures and suggestions conducive to the implementation of the policy, starting from a completely new theoretical point of view. It provides a solid theoretical basis and practical reference for the implementation of the "criminal quick adjudication" policy.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南交通大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D631.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 熊秋紅;;刑事簡易速裁程序之權(quán)利保障與體系化建構(gòu)[J];人民檢察;2014年17期

2 潘榮;;輕微刑事案件快速處理機(jī)制存在的問題及其對策[J];湖北警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年10期

3 李天忠;徐瓊;;構(gòu)建我國法律援助律師值班制度[J];中國司法;2011年11期

4 石時(shí)態(tài);張坤世;;刑事被害人權(quán)利保護(hù)機(jī)制之反思與完善[J];中國刑事法雜志;2010年12期

5 王銘;薛客;;論公共政策執(zhí)行不力的問題與對策[J];求實(shí);2010年S2期

6 陳丹;;論公共政策執(zhí)行的現(xiàn)狀[J];經(jīng)營管理者;2010年14期

7 周柏春;;影響公共政策失效的因素及其矯正[J];理論導(dǎo)刊;2009年12期

8 馬娜;;關(guān)于公共政策執(zhí)行問題的研究綜述[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2009年07期

9 浙江省瑞安市人民檢察院課題組;;輕微刑事案件快速處理機(jī)制研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年03期

10 孟慶瑞;公共政策實(shí)施過程中的若干問題探析[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2005年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 鄭赫南;;司法領(lǐng)域“試驗(yàn)性立法”開先河[N];檢察日報(bào);2014年

，

本文編號：2116730