本文選題：自我控制 + 社會聯(lián)系��； 參考：《中國政法大學》2009年碩士論文

【摘要】： 財產型犯罪是主要的犯罪類型之一,但是關于財產型犯罪的影響因素的探討比較缺乏。鑒于低階層男性財產型犯罪的研究不足的的現(xiàn)狀,本研究在自我控制理論、社會控制理論和社會支持理論的理論研究框架下,從個體微觀的角度考察個體的人口學變量、自我控制、社會聯(lián)系、社會支持及相對剝奪感等不同因素對財產型犯罪類型的影響,同時分析了不同因素對于犯罪行為刑期的影響。本研究的被試來自于山東省、廣東省、山西省、上海市等五個省市的監(jiān)獄系統(tǒng),問卷發(fā)放1000份,有效問卷909份。 研究者對調查問卷采用相關分析及路徑分析的方法探究影響財產型犯罪和刑期的影響因素,并采用方差分析的方法檢驗財產型犯罪與非財產型犯罪在不同社會階層等人口學變量、自我控制、社會聯(lián)系、社會支持和相對剝奪感方面的差異。研究結果發(fā)現(xiàn): 1、在男性服刑人員中,財產型犯罪占有66.3%,且不同階層、不同年齡、不同家庭收入其犯罪類型存在顯著差異;具體犯罪類型以盜竊和搶劫兩類犯罪為主,占到男性犯罪類型中的58.6%。 2、在自我控制能力上,不同社會階層的自我控制能力、沖動冒險性呈現(xiàn)顯著差異,社會下層均呈現(xiàn)最高的自我控制能力得分和沖動冒險性得分;財產型犯罪與非財產型犯罪的自我控制沒有呈現(xiàn)顯著差異。 3、在社會聯(lián)系變量上,不同社會階層的社會聯(lián)系及各個維度均呈現(xiàn)顯著差異,社會下層的社會聯(lián)系及各維度明顯低于社會中上層。不同犯罪類型的社會聯(lián)系沒有呈現(xiàn)顯著差異。 4、在社會支持程度上,不同犯罪類型的社會支持及各維度沒有呈現(xiàn)顯著差異,得分顯示財產型犯罪社會支持得分低于非財產性犯罪得分;不同社會階層的社會支持及各維度均呈現(xiàn)顯著差異,社會下層的社會支持及各維度得分顯著低于中高階層。 5、在相對剝奪感的得分上,不同受教育程度個體的相對剝奪感呈現(xiàn)顯著差異,受教育程度高的被試其相對剝奪感較低;不同收入水平和不同犯罪類型的被試其相對剝奪感沒有呈現(xiàn)顯著差異;不同社會階層的相對剝奪感呈現(xiàn)顯著差異,社會下層的相對剝奪感得分顯著高于社會上層的得分。 6、關于財產型犯罪影響因素的探討,結果表明年齡、家庭年收入、受教育程度、社會階層與財產型犯罪行為具有密切的關系,結果顯示社會下層比其他階層更容易發(fā)生財產型犯罪;自我控制及各維度,社會聯(lián)系中的參與、承諾和信念、社會支持和主觀支持以及相對剝奪感是影響財產型犯罪的因素。 7、對犯罪行為刑期的影響因素的探討顯示,年齡和受教育程度對于犯罪刑期具有正向的預測作用;社會聯(lián)系對于犯罪刑期具有顯著的影響作用;自我控制社會支持和相對剝奪感沒有顯著的預測作用,中介變量效應不顯著。 綜合本研究研究結果,男性服刑人員財產型犯罪的影響因素是復雜的,半數(shù)以上自我報告顯示其犯罪的原因是為了獲取錢財,另一個在數(shù)量上占優(yōu)勢的自我報告的犯罪原因是情緒失控,這在一定程度上說明,個體的微觀因素,即自我控制能力、社會聯(lián)系的質量、社會支持的程度以及感受相對剝奪感的強弱都是影響犯罪行為的重要因素。
[Abstract]:Property type crime is one of the main types of crime, but there is a lack of discussion on the influencing factors of property type crime. In view of the present situation of the low class male property crime, this study is based on the theoretical research framework of self-control theory, social control theory and social support theory, from the individual microcosmic perspective. The influence of individual demographic variables, self control, social contact, social support and relative deprivation on the type of property type crime, and the influence of different factors on the criminal period of criminal behavior. The subjects of this study came from the prison system in five provinces, such as Shandong, Guangdong, Shanxi, Shanghai and other provinces and cities. 1000 copies, 909 valid questionnaires.
The researchers used the method of correlation analysis and path analysis to explore the influence factors of property type crime and the term of sentence, and use the method of variance analysis to test the difference of demography variables such as property type crime and non property crime in different social strata, self-control, social connection, social support and relative deprivation. The results of the study found that:
1, among the male prisoners, property type crime occupies 66.3%, and there are significant differences in the types of crime between different classes, different ages, and family income. The specific types of crime are mainly the theft and robbery of two types of crime, which account for 58.6%. in the male crime type.
2, in the self-control ability, the self control ability of different social strata, impulse and adventure show significant difference, the lower level of society has the highest self-control score and impulse adventure score, and the self control of property type crime and non property crime has no significant difference.
3, on social contact variables, the social connections and various dimensions of different social strata show significant differences, and the social connections and dimensions of the lower social strata are obviously lower than the upper levels of the society. There is no significant difference in social relations between different types of crime.
4, in social support, there are no significant differences in social support and dimensions of different types of crime. The score shows that the score of social support for property type crime is lower than that of non property crime; the social support and various dimensions of different social strata show significant differences, and the social support and the scores of various dimensions in the lower level are significantly lower than those of the social strata. Middle and high class.
5, on the score of relative deprivation, the relative deprivation sense of the individuals with different degree of education is significantly different, and the relative deprivation sense of the subjects with higher education level is lower; the relative deprivation sense of the subjects with different income levels and different types of crime is not significantly different, and the relative deprivation sense of the social class is significantly different. The relative deprivation score of the lower class was significantly higher than that of the upper class.
6, on the influence factors of property type crime, the results show that age, family income, education, social stratum and property type crime have a close relationship. The result shows that the lower level of society is more likely to have property type crime than other strata; self control and various dimensions, social connections, commitment and belief, social support. Holding and subjective support and relative deprivation are the factors that affect property crime.
7, the study of the influencing factors of the criminal term shows that age and educational level have a positive predictive effect on the criminal sentence; social connection has a significant impact on the criminal sentence; self controlled social support and relative deprivation have no significant predictive effect, and the effect of intermediary variables is not significant.
According to the results of this study, the factors affecting the crime of male prisoners are complex. More than half of the self reports show that the cause of the crime is to obtain money. The other is the reason for the self reporting of the crime is out of control, to a certain extent, the microcosmic factor of the individual, that is, self control. The ability to make social connections, the degree of social support and the relative deprivation of feelings are important factors affecting criminal behavior.
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D917.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 黃淑瑤;;從社會支持網角度看流動人口犯罪[J];北京社會科學;2007年02期

2 楊麗珠,宋輝;幼兒自我控制能力發(fā)展的研究[J];心理與行為研究;2003年01期

3 張靈聰,黃希庭;初中學生學習自我控制量表的編制[J];湖南師范大學教育科學學報;2002年03期

4 林敬平;;在生存與失范之間——青年農民工越軌心理的二維路徑分析[J];青少年犯罪問題;2007年03期

5 魏翠妮,王善坤;青年農民工越軌行為的社會心理學分析[J];廣西青年干部學院學報;2005年05期

6 錢再見;中國社會弱勢群體及其社會支持政策[J];江海學刊;2002年03期

7 程素萍;張潮;賈建榮;;社會支持對大學生心理健康的影響[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2009年01期

8 肖雪蓮;;運用“相對剝奪感”理論對我國轉型時期弱勢群體的心理進行探析與調適[J];吉林廣播電視大學學報;2006年04期

9 歐陽丹;社會支持對大學生心理健康的影響[J];青年研究;2003年03期

10 屈智勇;鄒泓;段曉英;;自我控制、價值觀與青少年犯罪的關系[J];青年研究;2006年05期

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 楊慧芳;女性犯罪者的人格、應付方式、情境因素與犯罪行為的研究[D];華東師范大學;2003年

，

本文編號：2011825