本文選題：勞教改革 + 保安矯治　； 參考：《湘潭大學(xué)》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度已經(jīng)運(yùn)行了五十多年,發(fā)揮了重大歷史作用,但在創(chuàng)立之初,由于國家經(jīng)濟(jì)落后、財(cái)政收入嚴(yán)重不足、法律制度不健全,在發(fā)展過程中相關(guān)立法未能及時(shí)跟進(jìn),在一定程度上蛻變?yōu)樗^的“二勞改”。隨著我國法治化進(jìn)程的加快,其缺陷、弊端日益突顯,嚴(yán)重違背正當(dāng)程序原則,無法有效保障人權(quán),不能適應(yīng)新形勢發(fā)展的需要,亟待進(jìn)行改善,真正實(shí)現(xiàn)其挽救、感化、教育、再社會(huì)化、預(yù)防犯罪、防衛(wèi)社會(huì)和安置就業(yè)的價(jià)值功能,有利于我國政府在國際人權(quán)斗爭中爭取主動(dòng)。同時(shí),與其類似的法律措施如收容教養(yǎng)、收容教育、強(qiáng)制隔離戒毒(強(qiáng)制戒毒)、強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療、工讀學(xué)校都與保安處分制度在價(jià)值功能上大同小異,但也都存在同樣的缺陷和問題。這些問題逐漸引起了廣大法學(xué)研究者的關(guān)注,筆者希望通過自己的一些學(xué)習(xí)和探索找到一些有效的途徑解決這一長期困擾立法者和執(zhí)法者的問題,為進(jìn)一步豐富我國的法學(xué)理論、切實(shí)保護(hù)廣大民眾的權(quán)利、維護(hù)國家法制統(tǒng)一、建設(shè)中國特色的法治體系貢獻(xiàn)一份力量。 本文首先就我國相關(guān)制度的歷史、現(xiàn)狀、問題與域外相關(guān)的成功經(jīng)驗(yàn)和先進(jìn)制度進(jìn)行分析比較,認(rèn)為我國應(yīng)該借鑒保安處分制度整合相關(guān)制度和資源,利用《違法行為矯治法》討論、制定之良好契機(jī),構(gòu)建起具有中國特色的保安矯治制度。其次,本文在國內(nèi)眾多學(xué)者研究成果的基礎(chǔ)上就該制度的框架進(jìn)行了大膽設(shè)想:將《違法行為矯治法》更名為《保安矯治法》;明確了該制度的價(jià)值功能;對(duì)《保安矯治法》的內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了初步設(shè)想,包括司法決定模式和程序構(gòu)建、各種矯治措施的種類、期限,從而為我國相關(guān)制度的改善和進(jìn)一步發(fā)展提供法律支撐。最后,本文就矯治措施的執(zhí)行管理模式進(jìn)行了初步設(shè)計(jì),結(jié)合勞教場所執(zhí)行方式改革取得的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和成果,順應(yīng)世界潮流,凸顯執(zhí)行方式的社會(huì)化、靈活性,從而體現(xiàn)出新型矯治措施與刑罰、勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)、收容教養(yǎng)、強(qiáng)制戒毒等措施的區(qū)別。
[Abstract]:The system of re-education through labour has been in operation for more than 50 years and has played an important historical role. However, at the beginning of its establishment, due to the backward economy of the country, the serious shortage of financial revenue, and the unsound legal system, the relevant legislation failed to follow up in time during the development process. To some extent, the transformation into the so-called "two-labor reform." With the speeding up of the process of rule of law in our country, its defects and drawbacks are becoming more and more prominent, which seriously violate the principle of due process, cannot effectively protect human rights, and cannot adapt to the needs of the development of the new situation. The value functions of education, re-socialization, crime prevention, social defense and employment placement are helpful for our government to take the initiative in the international human rights struggle. At the same time, the similar legal measures, such as rehousing, receiving education, compulsory isolation detoxification (compulsory detoxification, compulsory medical treatment, work-study schools) all have the same value function as the system of security measures, but they all have the same defects and problems. These problems have gradually aroused the attention of the majority of legal researchers. The author hopes to find some effective ways to solve this long-standing problem of legislators and law enforcers through his own study and exploration. In order to further enrich the legal theory of our country, protect the rights of the masses, safeguard the unity of the national legal system, and build the legal system with Chinese characteristics. Firstly, this paper analyzes and compares the history, current situation, problems and successful experiences and advanced systems of the relevant systems in China, and concludes that our country should draw lessons from the system of security measures to integrate relevant systems and resources. Using the discussion of the Law of Correction of illegal acts and the good opportunity to establish the system of security correction with Chinese characteristics. Secondly, on the basis of the research results of many domestic scholars, this paper makes a bold assumption on the framework of the system: renaming the illegal behavior Correction Law to "Security Correction Law", clarifying the value function of the system; The content of "Security Correction Law" is preliminarily conceived, including the construction of judicial decision mode and procedure, the types and duration of various corrective measures, which provides legal support for the improvement and further development of the relevant system in China. Finally, this article has carried on the preliminary design to the correctional measure execution management pattern, unifies the experience and the achievement of the reform of the implementation mode of the place of re-education through labor, conforms to the world tide, highlights the execution way socialization, the flexibility, The difference between new treatment measures and punishment, reeducation through labor, institutionalization, compulsory detoxification and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D926.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭志鋒;論我國強(qiáng)制醫(yī)療制度之完善[J];安陽工學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年01期

2 魯嘉微;;邵名正教授談《違法行為矯治法》[J];中國司法;2007年05期

3 劉治安;;關(guān)于我國勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)工作發(fā)展趨勢的思考與展望[J];中國司法;2007年10期

4 李愛民;吳多智;;對(duì)勞教機(jī)關(guān)制度保障體系建設(shè)的思考[J];中國司法;2008年02期

5 許兵;;勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度與行政法治[J];中國司法;2008年02期

6 王京放;;從權(quán)力本位向權(quán)利本位轉(zhuǎn)變——略論樹立新的勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)執(zhí)法理念[J];中國司法;2008年06期

7 北京市新河勞教所課題組;;開放式管理模式下勞教人員執(zhí)行方式研究[J];中國司法;2008年08期

8 李祿廷;胡懷德;張凱;;試論科學(xué)發(fā)展觀統(tǒng)領(lǐng)下的精細(xì)化勞教管理[J];中國司法;2008年12期

9 李如林;;改革開放30年來勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)工作回顧[J];中國司法;2009年01期

10 魯嘉微;;“勞教執(zhí)法規(guī)范化建設(shè)”論壇綜述[J];中國司法;2009年02期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條

1 毛青;論保安處分[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

2 朱芹;國外保安處分制度對(duì)我國保安措施刑事立法化的借鑒[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2005年

3 劉海亮;關(guān)于《違法行為矯治法》立法之思考[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

4 鄒冬平;違法行為矯治制度研究[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

5 戶鳳英;保安處分及其在我國的構(gòu)建[D];西南政法大學(xué);2008年

6 陳莉穎;勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度的立法探討[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

7 王延衛(wèi);試論勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度改革[D];中國政法大學(xué);2009年

8 林淑蓉;保安處分研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

9 熊立;勞動(dòng)教養(yǎng)制度困境與出路的法律探討[D];湖南師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1969323