本文選題：青少年犯罪 + 危險因素��； 參考：《中南大學》2010年碩士論文

【摘要】： 目的探討男性青少年犯罪的主要影響因素,為開展青少年犯罪的預(yù)防提供理論依據(jù)和應(yīng)對策略。 方法采用病例對照研究方法,以湖南省少管所137例男性少年犯為病例組,以同一地區(qū)的145例在校男性青少年為對照組,采用一般情況問卷及青少年生活事件量表、應(yīng)付方式量表、家庭環(huán)境量表中文版、社會支持量表、人格診斷問卷進行問卷調(diào)查,采用非參數(shù)檢驗、兩獨立樣本t檢驗和逐步判別分析對資料進行單因素及多因素分析,篩選影響青少年犯罪的主要危險因素。 結(jié)果 1.單因素分析結(jié)果表明：犯罪青少年在負性生活事件總量及部分因子(人際關(guān)系、健康適應(yīng)、其它負性事件)、不成熟應(yīng)付方式(自責、幻想、退避)、合理化的應(yīng)付方式、家庭的矛盾性、各型人格缺陷(偏執(zhí)型、分裂性、分裂型、癔病型、自戀型、邊緣型、反社會型、回避型、依賴型、強迫型、被動攻擊型、抑郁型)上得分及家庭破裂的比例均高于對照組,而在受教育程度、負性生活事件中學習壓力因子、成熟的應(yīng)付方式(解決問題、求助)、家庭環(huán)境的部分因子(親密性、文化性、組織性)、社會支持(主觀支持、客觀支持、對支持的利用度)上得分均低于對照組,兩組間差異有統(tǒng)計學意義(p0.05)。 2.多因素分析結(jié)果表明：以有無犯罪為分類變量,進行逐步判別分析,最終發(fā)現(xiàn)人際關(guān)系及健康適應(yīng)方面的負性生活事件、自責的應(yīng)付方式、家庭環(huán)境的矛盾性、客觀支持、主觀支持、對支持的利用度、反社會人格、強迫人格、被動攻擊人格最終進入判別方程式,所得的判別方程式總正確率為92.2%。 結(jié)論 1.犯罪青少年家庭內(nèi)部的矛盾性較高。 2.犯罪青少年遭遇更多的負性生活事件,遭遇不良應(yīng)激時更易采取不成熟應(yīng)付方式去處理問題,可尋獲的有效社會支持網(wǎng)絡(luò)薄弱。 3.人際關(guān)系及健康適應(yīng)方面的負性生活事件,自責型的應(yīng)付方式,家庭環(huán)境的矛盾沖突及社會支持系統(tǒng)薄弱,反社會、強迫、被動攻擊型的人格缺陷,是識別青少年犯罪的主要危險因素。
[Abstract]:Objective to explore the main influencing factors of male juvenile delinquency and to provide theoretical basis and countermeasures for the prevention of juvenile delinquency. Methods A case-control study was conducted with 137 male juvenile delinquents in Hunan Provincial Juvenile Penitentiary Institute as the case group and 145 male adolescents in the same area as the control group. The general situation questionnaire and the Youth Life event scale were used. Coping style scale, Chinese version of Family Environment scale, Social support scale, Personality Diagnostic questionnaire, non-parametric test, two independent samples t test and stepwise discriminant analysis were used to analyze the data. Screening the main risk factors affecting juvenile delinquency. Result 1. The results of univariate analysis showed that the total number of negative life events and some factors (interpersonal relationships, health adaptation, other negative events, immature coping styles (self-reproach, fantasy, retreat, rationalization of coping style) of juvenile delinquents), Family contradictions, personality defects (paranoid, split, hysteria, narcissistic, marginal, antisocial, evasive, dependent, compulsive, passive, aggressive), The scores of depression type and the proportion of family breakup were higher than those of the control group, while the factors of education, negative life events, learning stress, mature coping style (problem solving, help seeking help, family environment) were higher than those of the control group. The scores of cultural, organizational and social support (subjective support, objective support, utilization of support) were lower than those of the control group, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p 0.05). 2. The results of multivariate analysis showed that: using crime or not as the classification variable, a stepwise discriminant analysis was carried out, and the negative life events in interpersonal relationships and health adaptation, the coping style of self-accusation, the contradiction of family environment, and objective support were finally found. Subjective support, utilization of support, antisocial personality, forced personality, passive attack personality finally enter the discriminant equation, the total correct rate of the discriminant equation is 92.22. Conclusion 1. The contradiction within the family of juvenile delinquents is relatively high. 2. Juvenile delinquents encounter more negative life events and are more likely to adopt immature coping styles to deal with problems when they encounter adverse stress. The effective social support network can be found to be weak. 3. Negative life events in interpersonal relationships and health adaptation, self-blame coping styles, contradictions and conflicts in the family environment and weak social support systems, antisocial, compulsive and passive personality defects, It is the main risk factor to identify juvenile delinquency.
【學位授予單位】：中南大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：C913.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 賀寨平;國外社會支持網(wǎng)研究綜述[J];國外社會科學;2001年01期

2 丁宇,肖凌 ,郭文斌 ,黃敏兒;社會支持在生活事件—心理健康關(guān)系中的作用模型研究[J];中國健康心理學雜志;2005年03期

3 李燕平;青少年研究的新趨勢——恢復(fù)力研究述評[J];青年研究;2005年05期

4 陳陳;家庭教養(yǎng)方式研究進程透視[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2002年06期

5 盛永慧,袁家璐,翟靜,賈杰芳;違法犯罪少年與正常少年個性特征差異及其家庭社會因素[J];中國臨床康復(fù);2005年20期

6 徐銀芳,盧寧,張海斌;未成年罪犯人格障礙與述情障礙相關(guān)分析[J];預(yù)防醫(yī)學情報雜志;2005年05期

7 于肖楠,張建新;韌性(resilience)——在壓力下復(fù)原和成長的心理機制[J];心理科學進展;2005年05期

8 吳念陽,張東昀;青少年親子關(guān)系與心理健康的相關(guān)研究[J];心理科學;2004年04期

9 方曉義,林丹華,孫莉,房超;親子溝通類型與青少年社會適應(yīng)的關(guān)系[J];心理發(fā)展與教育;2004年01期

10 黃希庭,余華,鄭涌,楊家忠,王衛(wèi)紅;中學生應(yīng)對方式的初步研究[J];心理科學;2000年01期

，

本文編號：1955319